Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Rilpivarine-based Antiretroviral Tratment Regimen in HIV- Infected Patients With Liver Metabolic Disease Who Maintain Udetectable HIV Viral Load

HIV Infections Clinical Trial

— MAFALDA-R  

Official title:

An Open Label, Comparative, Randomized , Phase IV Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Rilpivarine-based Antiretroviral Tratment Regimen in HIV- Infected Patients With Liver Metabolic Disease Who Maintain Udetectable HIV Viral Load

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05898841
• Other study ID #: GESIDA 12422
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: May 26, 2023
• Est. completion date: April 1, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: June 2023
• Source: Fundacion SEIMC-GESIDA
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In HIV-infected people with metabolic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis of any degree, as measured by non-invasive testing, antiretroviral treatment that includes rilpivinire for 18 months results in a slowing of progression and/or reduction of fatty metabolic liver disease, attenuating inflammation and liver fibrosis.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 75
• Est. completion date: April 1, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: November 1, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients over 18 years of age with HIV infection who have never received antiretroviral treatment with Rilpivirine.
• Have a stable ART pattern for at least the last 6 month

Exclusion Criteria:

• Not having received more than three previous lines of antiretroviral treatment
• No resistance mutations that compromise the efficacy of Rilpivirine, Dolutegravir, Tenofovir (TDF and/or TAF) or Emtricitabine.
• Have an HIV viral load < 50 copies/ml for at least the last 6 months, 1 blip below 500 copies/ml is allowed during this period.
• Have an ultrasound-diagnosed fatty liver metabolic disease or a CAP (Controlled Attenuation Parameter®) measurement > 238 dB/m with an IQR < 30 dB/m.
• Have an fatty liver metabolic disease with some degree of fibrosis diagnosed by ET (Fibroscan®) > 5.2 kPa. In patients in whom ET is not possible, have a FIB-4 >1.3.
• Be able to understand and comply with the requirements and instructions of the protocol.
• Understanding long-term commitment to study
• Acceptance of their participation in the study by signing an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Have chronic HBV infection (presence of HBsAg+) or HCV (detectable HCV viral load). Patients with past treated HCV are also not allowed to be included (does not include patients with spontaneously resolved HCV infection).
• Have diabetes mellitus on treatment with SGLT2, GLP1 or plioglitazone of less than 6 months duration.
• Have a history of alcohol abuse
• Harmful alcohol consumption, defined as >30 grams of alcohol per day in men and >20 grams of alcohol per day in women.
• Have chronic decompensated liver disease, defined as any of the following: presence of encephalopathy, ascites, coagulopathy, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice.
• Any previous physical or mental condition (such as habitual drug use) that the investigator believes may interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the study protocol.
• Pregnancy or breastfeeding at the screening visit or at any time during the study or intention to become pregnant during the study period.
• Prior history of Rilpivirine use of any duration.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Fatty Liver
• Fatty Liver Disease
• HIV Infections
• Liver Diseases
• Metabolic Diseases

Intervention

Drug:
• Dolutegravir (DTG) 50 mg/day + Rilpivirine (RPV) 25mg per day
DTG/RPV will be administered in combination as 50/25 mg/day tablets or separately as DTG 50 mg/d tablets together with RPV 25 mg/d tablets. There will be no problem if during the course of the study the patient is switched from the combined form to the separate form and vice versa as long as the HAART (Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy) components are respected.
• Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 245 mg per day or Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 25 mg per day + Emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg per day + Rilpivirine 25 mg per day
TDF 245 mg/d or TAF 25mg/d together with FTC 200 mg/d and RPV 25 mg/d. They may be administered as single tablets or in combination forms where one tablet contains TDF/TAF and FTC and another RPV tablet. There will be no problem if during the course of the study the patient is switched from the combined form to the separate form and vice versa as long as the HAART components are respected.
• Continue with their previous treatment. Any previous HAART that does not contain Rilpivirine.
Patients who are randomised to this treatment arm will continue with the HAART they were receiving prior to signing the informed consent. As in arms 1 and 2, a change in the form of HAART administration (from a combined to a separate form and vice versa) will be allowed as long as the HAART components are respected.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon	Madrid
Spain	Hospital universitario Infanta Leonor	Madrid
Spain	Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía	Madrid
Spain	Hospital Universitario La Paz	Madrid

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Fundacion SEIMC-GESIDA

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) as part of the antiretroviral treatment regimen in VIH-infected people, to slow the progression and/or reduce liver fibrosis of any degree	To measure the no progression and/or regression of liver fibrosis: No change in liver stiffness as measured by ET (Transient Elastography) or FIB4 at the 18-month visit with respect to the baseline, the intervention group (branches 1 and 2) compared to the control group.	18 months
Primary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) as part of the antiretroviral treatment regimen in VIH-infected people, to slow the progression and/or reduce liver fibrosis of any degree	Reduction in liver stiffness measured by ET or FIB4 at the 18-month visit from baseline in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group.	18 months
Secondary	Efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade	To evaluate the efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade, as measured by non-invasive tests, in HIV-infected people: as part of a nucleoside analogue-free antiretroviral treatment regimen; as part of an antiretroviral treatment regimen that includes tenofovir; Proportion of subjects with ET measurement < 5.2 kPa in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	Efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade	Proportion of subjects with a FIB4 measurement < 1.3 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	Efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade	The mean reduction in the APRI measure in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	Efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade	Proportion of subjects with an APRI measure < 0.5 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	The mean reduction in the percentage of liver fat, measured by magnetic resonance imaging, which measures the proton density fraction of fat (MRI-PDFF), between the beginning and the end of the study comparing the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) vs control group	18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	Difference in the proportion of responders between the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) at 18 months from the start of treatment, defined as those who achieve >30% reduction in hepatic steatosis measured by MRI-PDFF	18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	Proportion of subjects with hepatic steatosis measured as MRI-PDFF > 5% steatosis in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 18 months from the start of treatment	18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	The mean reduction of the CAP measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	The mean reduction in the FLI measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	The mean reduction in the HSI measure in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	The mean reduction of the TyG measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	Proportion of subjects with hepatic steatosis measured as CAP > 238 dB/m in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	The mean reduction in the FLI measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	Proportion of subjects with hepatic steatosis measured as HSI score > 36 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis	Proportion of subjects with hepatic steatosis measured as TyG score > 8.38 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance	The mean reduction of the HOMA-IR value in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance	Difference in the proportion of subjects with insulin resistance, measured as HOMA-IR >2.5 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance	Mean reduction in TyG (IR) measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance	Difference in the proportion of subjects with insulin resistance measured as TyG > 4.68 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance	The mean reduction in fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance	Difference in the proportion of subjects with fasting glycemia > 100 mg/dL in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance	The reduction in the measurement of abdominal circumference and waist ratio/in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatmen	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism	The mean reduction in fasting triglycerides (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism	Difference in the proportion of subjects with hypertriglyceridemia (value > 150 mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism	Mean reduction in fasting LDL cholesterol quantification (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism	Difference in the proportion of subjects with elevated LDL cholesterol (value > 130 mg/dL and value >100 mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months of start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism	The mean increase in fasting HDL cholesterol quantification (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism	Difference in the proportion of subjects with elevated HDL cholesterol (value > 45 mg/dL in men and value > 50 mg/dL in women) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism	The mean reduction in fasting non-LDL cholesterol quantification (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism	Difference in the proportion of subjects with elevated non-LDL cholesterol (value > 160 mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the liver inflammation	The mean change in ALT value (IU/mL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) vs. the control group at 12 and 18 months from baseline	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the liver inflammation	The mean change in AST value (IU/mL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the baseline visit	12-18 months
Secondary	To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the liver inflammation.	The change of the gene expression value of: IL1-beta, IL6, IL10, MCP1, PAI-1, TGF-alpha, TNF-alpha in PBMCs in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months compared to the baseline visit.	12-18 months
Secondary	Efficacy of RPV to reduce hepatic steatosis/fibrosis.	To assess the efficacy of RPV as part of the antiretroviral treatment regimen in HIV-infected individuals to reduce hepatic steatosis/fibrosis based on the presence of PNPLA3 and MBOAT7-TMC4 genetic polymorphisms.	18 months
Secondary	To characterise the effects of RPV on the expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic markers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells	. Analyse the gene expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic markers in peripheral blood polymorphonuclear cells by RT-PCR: IL1-gamma, IL6, IL10, MCP1, P AI-1, TGF-beta, TNF-alpha.	18 months
Secondary	To characterise the effects of RPV on the expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic markers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells	. Measurement of ALT, AST and GGT in plasma as markers of inflammation.	18 months
Secondary	Efficacy of RPV to reduce the progression to steatohepatitis	In previous studies it has shown that PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and MBOAT7-TMC4 polymorphisms are associated with elevated ALT levels and histologic parameters of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis severity.; On the baseline visit will be collected biological samples for genetuic study. A 3 ml blood sample will be drawn into an EDTA tube at baseline visit for determination of PNPLA3 (C, G alleles) and MBOAT7-TMC4 (G, A alleles) genetic polymorphisms.	18 months