View clinical trials related to Hip Osteoarthritis.
Filter by:This is a randomized control trial that will investigate whether a collared hip replacement implant provides greater stability compared to a collarless option. Stability will be measured by implant migration with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) imaging. Secondary objectives will be to compare function, quality of life and cost between the two implant types. We will also compare between two different surgical approaches, the direct anterior and direct lateral.
Fast-track programs in Orthopaedic Surgery require early motion that can only be achieved by optimal pain management protocols. Multimodal analgesia protocols including local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) have obtained excellent results in fast-track programs involving Total Knee Arthroplasty but further research and data is needed in Total Hip Arthoplasty programs.
The uncemented Symax hip stem is developed through optimization of the uncemented Omnifit hip stem. The Symax stem design combines an anatomical anteverted proximal geometry with a straight distal section. The proximal part is coated with a biomimetic hydroxyapatite (HA) coating for improved osseointegration to enhance load transfer and to minimize proximal bone loss. The distal part is treated with an anodization surface treatment in order to prevent distal bone apposition, which is expected to prevent distal loading and reduce proximal stress shielding. Aim of this study is to report mid-term clinical performance and evaluate whether the radiographic features are in line with the design principles of the Symax hip in an international clinical study with 5 years of follow-up.
This project aims at performing a pilot study to provide data on safety and potential efficacy of Magnetic Resonance guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) in the treatment of pain caused by trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (OA) and/or scaphotrapezial OA, and by hip OA, while exploring the potential application of MRgFUS to two different and central joints burdened by OA.
This study is in response to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) call to all manufacturers with 510(k) clearance for metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) devices to conduct postmarket surveillance studies. MicroPort has various acetabular shells, acetabular liners, fixation screws, femoral heads, femoral stems, modular necks, and proximal bodies currently cleared for MoM indications. Together these components comprise the Wright Medical Technology (WMT) MoM THA System. The primary objective of the study is to determine the incidence of adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) in each THA implanted with the WMT MoM THA System overall and to create cross-sectional epochs of ≤ 8 years and > 8 years, since implantation.
This is a single center, prospective, randomized controlled study. The primary objective of this study is to measure migration over two years with RSA. Patients will be randomized in two arms, receiving a Taperloc Complete Reduced Distal or a Taperloc Complete Microplasty hip stem.
Success of the hip arthroplasty depends on the measures that optimize perioperative conditions.It is planned to evaluate semi-closed loop system in the hip arthroplasty surgery.
The care for patients receiving total hip and knee arthroplasty at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences has followed a structured care pathway since July 2015. This system of perioperative care has focused on preoperative assessment of medical co-morbidities and risks to postoperative functional recovery, anesthetic care focused on postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention and optimizing immediate postoperative functional ability, and aggressive postoperative physical therapy. This is an observational study to look at the outcomes of this program at University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Areas of focus will be hospital length of stay, postoperative narcotic consumption, Visual Analog Scale scores, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and 30-day readmission rates, and health literacy rates.
The study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of a home-based rehabilitation program using a novel digital biofeedback system against conventional home-based rehabilitation after total hip replacement This system allows the patients to perform independent rehabilitation sessions at home, under remote monitoring from the clinical team. The investigators hypothesise that the clinical outcomes of a home-based rehabilitation program will be at least similar to the outcomes of a traditional home-based rehabilitation with face-to-face sessions. This is a single-center, prospective, parallel-group pilot study with active comparator. Patients will be enrolled pre-operatively and then divided into 2 groups: experimental group and conventional rehabilitation group. Both groups will perform an 8-week rehabilitation program starting between day 7 and 10 after surgery. The experimental group will perform daily exercise sessions at home using the system, under remote monitoring from a physical therapist. The conventional rehabilitation group will perform 3 home-based rehabilitation sessions per week, each with 1h duration, given by a physical therapist. Outcomes will be measured at weeks 4 and 8 and then at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome is the change in patient performance measured by the Timed-up-and-Go (TUG) test between in comparison with the pre-operative score. Secondary outcomes will be measured in terms of: a) Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS); b) range of motion of the hip joint (lying flexion/abduction; standing flexion/adbuction/hyperextension)
Barbed suture use has been gaining increased acceptance and has been reported to offer potential advantages in wound closure of hip and knee replacement surgeries. The goal of this study is to compare joint replacement patient outcomes who receive a knotless barbed suture versus a traditional suture (randomized into two arms). The traditional suture used at our joint replacement program is defined as: interrupted sutures to close the retinaculum followed by running monocryl sutures for skin closure. Both knotless barbed suture and the traditional sutures have similar suture size. Patient outcomes examined will be patient range of motion (recorded daily) and complications with wound healing (evaluated periodically in-person at post-operative visits). Secondary outcomes examined will include wound drainage on dressings by surface area and weight, as well as the wound cosmesis and perceived presence of subcutaneous surgical knots.