View clinical trials related to Hip Osteoarthritis.
Filter by:Osteoarthritis leads to reduced independence and quality of life. Total hip replacement is a successful and cost-effective surgical intervention to relieve pain and improve functioning in patients with osteoarthritis. Research has shown that preoperative health status strongly predicts outcomes including physical function and hospitalization length after hip replacement surgery. Frail patients, in particular, are at greater risk of poor postoperative outcomes and could potentially benefit from interventions targeting an improvement in their health status prior to undergoing a hip or knee replacement surgery. Partnering with the YMCA and a multi-disciplinary team of healthcare providers, this pilot trial will examine the feasibility of a multi-modal intervention for frail patients that includes a supervised exercise program, vitamin D and protein supplementation, and a medication review. The results of this feasibility study will guide the design of a future multi-centre study, which if successful, could be developed into a routine model of care that is implemented in joint replacement programs across Ontario and ultimately improving the lives of frail seniors undergoing hip or knee replacement.
The incidence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is rising in western countries due to an ageing population and the epidemic of obesity. Patients with hip OA tend to complain of hip pain and stiffness which affect alignment and mobility of the whole body and typically result in general musculoskeletal pain and disability. Clinical guidelines recommend a combination of exercise therapy, weight loss and education, adjusted to the individuals needs, to be tried out before arthroplasty eventually is offered. However, to obtain a satisfactory long-term outcome is a challenge as patients may not be motivated to comply with a training program including functional strength and mobility training, if not guided by a therapist. Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) may be an alternative training modality with a better potential for lasting effects. It is a low-impact movement therapy focusing on alignment of the body and quality of movements, implemented in daily life activities. In the BBAT learning process by doing, reflecting on and transferring body awareness into daily life movements, the investigators hypothesize that the patients will obtain self-efficacy and mastering, of importance for continued training on their own. This hypothesis will be examined in the present randomized controlled trial, comparing Patient Education combined with BBAT and Patient Education alone. The investigators will, accordingly, examine the supplementary effects of BBAT for patients with hip OA. They will also explore the importance of movement quality as observed by physiotherapist using Body Awareness Rating Scale, and how it relates to how patients perceive their movement performance. In the study the investigators will particularly address long-term effects of the intervention by comparing survival of the native hip in the two groups included in the study. Data from the study will be included in a national database of patients with non-surgical treatment of hip and knee OA (NOAR), giving rise to comparison of different movement therapies.
The START study will implement osteoarthritis (OA) treatment recommendations to increase the use of recommended treatment modalities and reduce non-desired events (e.g. unnecessary referrals to secondary care, unnecessary use of costly imaging modalities and use of treatment modalities supported by low quality of evidence). The purpose of the STavanger osteoARThritis (START) study is to improve the quality of OA care and increase the collaboration between health care professionals in primary health care and across health care levels.
The current management of osteoarthritis is based on non-pharmacological and pharmacological means which include intra-articular injections. The recommendations on the management of hip osteoarthritis stipulate that intra-articular injections of corticosteroid may be considered in patients with an exacerbation not responding to oral treatments. Several recent studies show the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroids compared with anesthetics. The intra-articular injection of viscosupplementation alone has never been validated in this indication since controlled studies did not show efficacy over placebo. At present, viscosupplementation is considered an anti-osteoarthritic symptomatic slow-acting and its interest is not yet established in hip osteoarthritis.
Several authors explain as the kinesiophobia plays an important role for the recovery after orthopaedic surgery. The aim of the investigators study is to investigate if the kinesiophobia is able to influence the early recovery after total hip arthroplasty. The early recovery will be measured by the ILOA Score. The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia will measure the fear level of movement. All the other variable that could influence the ILOA Score are identified and collected: age, sex, body max index, ability of patient pre-surgery, type of anesthesia, length of stay, pain, haemoglobin, possible complications.
This study is a 2X2 factorial randomized trial that will the examine the comparative effectiveness of two patient decision aids for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) as well as the impact of a surgeon-focused intervention.
This pilot RCT study is to examine the comparative effectiveness of two decision aids for hip and knee osteoarthritis.
In total hip arthroplasty, cup anteversion is an important factor in stability. Lewinnek's safe zone and functional anteversion are often used to assess appropriate orientation. However, these approaches do not consider the effect of the spinopelvic chain and lumbar mobility when in the seated position. This study will measure functional anteversion when standing and sitting with patient-specific computer models and define a quantitative relationship between the change in functional anteversion and spinopelvic parameters. This will challenge the historical paradigm of the safe zone and provide a tool to define anteversion based on a patient's mechanics and reduce risk of dislocation.
In orthopaedic manual therapy translatoric grades of movement are used to determine the intensity of force applied during the mobilization. Different clinical effects are described for each translatoric grade of movement but there are not published studies evaluating these clinical effects. The objective of this trial is to determine if force magnitude during hip traction in resting position affects immediate and short-term outcomes (pain, physical function, hip muscle length and hip range of motion) in patients with hip osteoarthritis. For this purpose, investigators conduct a randomized clinical trial, double-blind (patient and physical therapist examiner). Participants entering the study were randomized into 1 of 3 treatment groups: grade I- grade IISZ mobilization, grade IITZ mobilization or grade III mobilization. Participants attend three sessions on alternate days (monday, wednesday, friday) and at the same hour. Measurements are taken prior to treatment, immediately after each session treatment. The participants are recruited from physiotherapy groups or referred by general practitioners and orthopedic surgeons. Participants were assigned to 1 of the 3 study groups through concealed allocation (sealed envelopes) and independent blocked randomization, using a random number generator. One physical therapist enroll patients in the study, while an independent research assistant performed the randomization and prepared the sealed envelopes, which are opened after baseline data collection by the physiotherapist performing the treatments. Participants are treated in a private treatment area and have no knowledge of treatments received by other participants. A second experienced orthopaedic manual therapist applies the standardized hip traction mobilization in resting position at either level of force, during 10 minutes. This amount of mobilization is consistent with clinical practice and previous studies in osteoarthritis patients. Two physiotherapists (third and fourth) with 5 years of experience, who were blinded to participant group, performed all measurements.The outcome measures are pain, physical function, hip muscle length and hip passive range of motion. Pain is registered with visual analogic scale (VAS), Pressure Pain Threshold ( PPT) and WOMAC pain subscale. Physical function is registered using Timed Up & Go test (TUG), the 20-Meter Walking Test (20MWT) and the physical function subscale of WOMAC index. The hip muscle length is measured using Ely´s test, Active Knee Extension test and modified Ober´s test. The passive hip range of motion is measured using inclinometer or goniometer.
To date, detailed analysis of movement patterns in orthopaedic conditions are mainly performed in research projects. Because these tests are time consuming, they are not feasible in clinical routine or in standard examinations. Novel technologies allow capturing detailed movement patters within a few minutes. The aim of this regional study is to compare aspects of movement tasks measured using a mobile gait analysis system to those measured using laboratory based systems and to determine aspects of gait patterns relevant for different orthopaedic conditions. Moreover, the researchers will investigate if these relevant aspects can be altered using surgical treatment or manual therapy.