View clinical trials related to Hernia.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical treatment for sportsman's hernia in our department to the current literature. Our hypothesis is that combined solution for the two major problems that cause pain in this syndrome - repair the weakness in the posterior wall of the inguinal canal with "tension free" technique (mesh repair) and reducing the muscle strain on the abdominal wall by cutting, partially, the tendon of the external oblique muscle, will shorten the time to return to full physical activity in soccer players.
There are only little data on the risk of chronic complaints (pain and discomfort) following open non-mesh sutured repairs of small umbilical or epigastric hernias. Our primary and secondary endpoints were long-term pain and discomfort at rest, respectively and thirdly recurrence. The setup was a retrospective two-centre study including patients ≥18 years undergoing primary elective open non-mesh sutured umbilical or epigastric hernia repairs. The survey included questions on suspicion of recurrence, reoperation for recurrence (if yes patients were examined by a consultant in patients home), pain, discomfort, work, and leisure activities. We analysed 295 consecutive patients through a non-validated structured questionnaire.
Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a very common procedure. Postoperative pain, especially around the umbilical port is dominating the first postoperative week. Single Incision Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has been proposed to diminish postoperative incisional pain and improve cosmetic results, but results are not convincing and the risk of formation of an umbilical trocar-site hernia is not properly investigated. This study aimed to investigate the risk of umbilical trocar-site hernia formation after SILC vs. conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholesystectomy. Methods This is a cohort registry study with prospective questionnaire and clinical follow-up on 239 patients having a SILC from 1/1 2009 to 1/6 2011 vs. 478 mathed patients having a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (consecutively from one month before and after SILC. They are matched for age, gender, date of operation, and surgeons skills (database from intraoperatively registered data). Primary endpoint is umbilical trocar-site hernia formation (operation for a umbilical hernia or clinical hernia). The H0 hypothesis is that there is not difference between SILC and conventional. Exclusion criteria are: death, operation for acute cholecystitis. The included patients will be sent a questionnaire asking for operation for a hernia in the area, suspicion of a hernia, and perioperative data that we do not have in the database. Futhermore those patients who suspect a hernia will be invited to aclinical exam by a medic to state the diagnosis. Furthermore we patients are asked to report if they have chronic pain and/or discomfort.
Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair a variety of fixation methods has been proposed to ensure the correct and stable intra-abdominal placement of the mesh, in order to prevent recurrence, but on the other hand avoiding long-term pain and discomfort. The optimal method is unclear. In Denmark the investigators have a nationwide database that records 80% of all ventral hernia repairs. The investigators combine data from the Danish Hernia Database, the National Patient Registry, and prospective questionnaire and clinical follow-up in order to get the true recurrence rate (clinical and reoperation rate) and the degree of long-term discomfort. Purpose The purpose of this national prospective kohort study is to compare the risk of developing recurrence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with either absorbable or non-absorbable tacks, and to investigate possible. late complaints in terms of pain and discomfort after the two mesh fixation devices. The investigators include 355 laparoscopic incisional hernia repairs with absorbable tacks and 726 with non-absorbable tacks. It is expected that about 300 patients will be offered physical examination. Material and Method Register-based cohort study of perioperative entry of patient data and prospective questionnaire follow-up and depending on the answer to any. clinical trial. Follow-up is done by searching the Danish Hernia Database and the National Patient Register (to ensure data completeness) and distribution of patient questionnaire as reoperation for hernia recurrence is an underestimate of the true recurrence risk. Statistics There will be performed frequency analyzes and Kaplan Meyer statistics on the 2 groups supplemented with multivariate Cox regression analysis. Using non-parametric statistics. P <0.05 considered statistically significant.
The purpose of this research study is to find the best way to decrease pain in children right after surgery whom have had their hernia fixed. Right now, there are two different ways surgeons and anesthesia providers try to decrease pain. It is not clear if one way is better than the other. The method used is often chosen by which one the doctor has more experience using. The Investigator plans to find out if one of the methods is more effective and/or safer than the other method. The results of this study will help learn how to best control pain in children having surgery for hernia repair.
The primary objective of the present trial is to investigate, the mean operative time and to study the frequency and intensity of postoperative shoulder tip pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, i.e. cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery, hernia repair with AirSeal® compared with standard pressure CO2 insufflation systems. The primary hypothesis is that patients operated with AirSeal® have a shorter mean operative time and decreased frequency and intensity of postoperative shoulder tip pain compared with patients undergoing surgery with standard pressure CO2 insufflation systems. It is the secondary objective of the trial to evaluate immunologic and anaesthesiological aspects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery and laparoscopic hernia repair by observing the immune responses and volume of mechanical ventilation of the two groups through measuring various immunologic factors and ventilation volume/CO2 elimination volume. Surgical side effects will also be measured as secondary objective.
Digital rectal examination is an act clinically performed daily by physicians and surgeons. It remains the key diagnostic test and directs the therapeutic management of cancer of the lower and middle rectum. It can be done in two main positions: lateral decubitus, and supine. However, no randomized study in colorectal surgery is not interested in evaluating the best position to perform a full rectal exam.
Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP) is one of the treatment options for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Previous studies showed that patients underwent TEP have less post-operative pain and earlier return to normal activities. However, chronic pain is still a major issue affecting quality of life after TEP with a reported incidence of 9.2-22.5%. Mechanical stapling is the most commonly used method of mesh fixation to prevent mesh migration but nerve entrapment by staples causing intractable pain had been reported. Recently several clinical trials showed that mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (FS) in TEP resulted in less chronic pain but increased incidence of seroma. A spraying device for application of FS laparoscopically is now available which can achieve mesh fixation by using fewer amounts of FS. In this study, the investigators aim to compare the effectiveness of using fibrin spray for mesh fixation in reducing chronic pain after TEP. The investigators performed a randomized controlled trial by allocating patients in two study arm in random manner. The treatment group will have the mesh fixed by fibrin sealant spray, whereas the control group will have conventional mechanical staples for fixation. Operative procedures and post-operative management for the 2 groups will be identical. They will be follow-up at 1-month and 6-month after operation to evaluate the operative results and the incidence of chronic pain. Any complications related to the mesh and operation will also be recorded.
Introduction: parastomal hernia (PH) is a frequent complication after an ostomy, despite the many prevention and treatment techniques that have been described. Since the introduction of laparoscopy, the frequency of PH is even higher than in open surgery. This type of hernia remains a surgical problem of considerable importance, requiring significant consumption of public health and economic resources, and representing a major alteration of the quality of life of these patients. Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of the insertion of a prosthesis to prevent PH in elective surgery for laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Methodology: prospective, multidisciplinary, multi-center randomized controlled study. Control group: Rectal neoplasms undergoing elective surgery for laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Study group: Rectal neoplasms undergoing elective surgery for laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with a lightweight mesh (polypropylene and poliglecaprone 25). Sample size was calculated based on a proportion of parastomal hernia of 65% in the control group and 15% in the study group. With an α risk =0.05 and 1- β= 0.8, 28 patients are required, 14 per group. Estimating a drop-out rate of 10%, the final number will be 32 patients. The efficacy will be evaluated clinically at six months and abdominal CT will be performed at 12 months along with another clinical evaluation.
A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial comparing closure versus non-closure of the hernia defect between 2 and 5 cm in width using a tissue separating mesh (Physiomesh™) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.