Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Criteria for Liver Transplantation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular cancer is the 6th most common seen disease in the world and the 3rd in cancer-related deaths. Liver transplantation is the primary curative treatment of HCC, as it eliminates liver cancer and underlying cirrhosis. However, liver transplantation is not offered to every HCC patient, since advanced stage HCC patients are lost with tumor recurrence early after liver transplantation. The Milan criteria, which are accepted worldwide, are the patient selection criteria that we have to follow in cadaver-to-liver transplantation for HCC in our country. However, as the Milan criteria are very strict criteria, it pushes patients out of liver transplantation who exceed the Milan criteria but who can benefit from liver transplantation. Liver transplantation centers all over the world have declared their own criteria under the expanded Milan criteria. In our country, Malatya Criteria have been defined by İnönü University on this subject, and our studies on this subject still continue. When we scan the original articles of all these defined criteria, incomplete data are formed and therefore the strength of the criteria cannot be clearly revealed. For this reason, we aimed to analyze the results of our center and present information about the power of the criteria to the literature.
Aim: To investigate the criteria with the longest overall and disease-free survival and
lowest recurrence rates in liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer (HCC).
Introduction: When the liver transplant criteria for HCC were examined, we saw that many
criteria defined in their original articles did not include the rates of extending the Milan
criteria, survival and recurrence rates of non-milan patients who were within the newly
defined criteria. Therefore, information on which of the criteria defined for liver
transplantation in HCC extends the Milan criteria more, which has a longer survival rate and
which has a lower recurrence rate is lacking. In order to eliminate this deficiency or at
least to have a rough idea, we aimed to compare the results of liver transplantation,
performed for HCC in our institute which is a high-volume liver transplant center, by
analyzing it according to the existing defined criteria. Thus, we were able to compare the
criteria in a homogeneous patient group that was formed as a result of the same inclusion and
exclusion criteria in the same period of time. The highest overall and disease-free survival,
the lowest recurrence rate, and the criterion that extends the Milan criteria will be
introduced. In addition, this study is the first comprehensive comparison of liver transplant
criteria for HCC.
Methods: Between March 2002 and July 2020, the data of 424 patients who underwent liver
transplantation due to HCC at the Liver Transplantation Institute of İnönü University will be
retrospectively analyzed from the prospectively recorded data bank and automation system.
Tumor size, tumor number, differentiation and microscopic venous invasion data will all be
recorded from the data in the explant pathology report. Since the primary aim of our study is
cancer-related survival in patients who can be transplanted, 31 patients with tumor invasion
outside the liver (extrahepatic portal vein tumor thrombosis, perihilar lymph node
metastasis, diaphragmatic invasion etx) and 70 patients with follow-up period after liver
transplantation below 90 days will be excluded from the study. The remaining 323 patients
will be included in the study and their data will be analyzed. First, demographic data, tumor
characteristics, overall and disease-free survival and recurrence rate of 323 HCC patients
who were the study group, will be calculated, and then these patients will be divide groups
according to be within or beyond the criteria, than survival and recurrence rates will be
calculated. It was then examined whether these expanded criteria actually extended the Milan
criteria. It was checked whether a defined Expanded criterion allowed liver transplantation
for patients outside of Milan while excluding patients within Milan from liver
transplantation. How far the expanded criteria expand the Milan and survival of the patients
who beyond Milan but within the criteria were analyzed separately. Thus, the most useful
criterion for liver transplantation in HCC treatment will be revealed.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04209491 -
Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
|
||
Completed |
NCT03963206 -
Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03268499 -
TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05263830 -
Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05044676 -
Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05095519 -
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05497531 -
Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05068193 -
A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03781934 -
A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03655613 -
APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04242199 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04401800 -
Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05418387 -
A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04039607 -
A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03970616 -
A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03642561 -
Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06239155 -
A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03222076 -
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer
|
Phase 2 |