Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02511522
Other study ID # HE1
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 11, 2015
Est. completion date December 31, 2024

Study information

Verified date April 2023
Source Canadian Cancer Trials Group
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to see whether one dose of palliative radiation therapy directed to the liver in combination with standard BSC might help to reduce liver pain/discomfort due to cancer when compared to getting standard BSC alone.


Description:

The standard treatment for liver cancer pain or discomfort like yours is known as best supportive care (BSC) and includes pain-relieving medicines called analgesics. This type of treatment can help in some cases; however, some analgesics require a healthy liver to work properly. This means that there are many patients who have a hard time managing their liver cancer pain/discomfort with BSC alone. Sometimes radiation therapy is given in the "palliative" setting meaning it is designed to treat the pain/discomfort and not necessarily to shrink or eliminate the tumour. Palliative radiation therapy is often given when patients have painful bone tumours, but is not yet widely used to treat liver pain/discomfort. Palliative radiation therapy is usually given in smaller amounts and less frequently than other kinds of radiation therapy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 66
Est. completion date December 31, 2024
Est. primary completion date October 26, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - A diagnosis of cancer by at least one criterion listed below: - Pathologically or cytologically proven carcinoma from primary site or site of metastases; - Pathologically or cytologically proven HCC; - HCC diagnosed by standard imaging criteria: arterial enhancement and delayed washout on multiphasic computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B or C without cirrhosis. - Largest burden of cancer in the liver is confirmed with CT scan or MRI corresponding to the clinically painful area done within 120 days prior to randomization. - Diffuse (infiltrative involving > 50% of the liver), multifocal (> 10 lesions) or locally advanced cancer (at least one lesion > 10cm, vascular invasion, or multiple lesions with at least one > 6cm) involving the liver. - In the investigator's opinion, patient is unsuitable for or refractory to standard local and regional therapies. For example: - HCC unsuitable for resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemo embolization (TACE) or radical intent, ablative dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT); - Colorectal carcinoma metastases unsuitable for resection, RFA or radical intent, ablative dose SBRT (e.g. SBRT, > 30 Gy in 5 fractions, may be an option for up to 3 metastases < 5cm each, or up to 5 metastases < 3 cm each). - Unsuitable for, high risk for, or refractory to, standard systemic chemotherapy or targeted therapy (e.g. sorafenib). - Patient reports moderate or severe pain/discomfort prior to the baseline evaluation and this pain is considered "stable" over a period of up to 7 days prior to randomization. Definition of moderate pain: Patient reports level of 4-6 (on a BPI scale from 0 to 10) pain or discomfort "at its worst in the past 24 hours", occurring in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen, the upper abdomen and/or referred to the right shoulder, attributable to liver cancer. Definition of severe pain: Patient reports level of 7-10 (on a BPI scale from 0 to 10) pain or discomfort "at its worst in the past 24 hours", occurring in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen, the upper abdomen and/or referred to the right shoulder, attributable to liver cancer. Definition of "stable" pain: Patient must show moderate or severe "stable" pain by reporting a score of 4 or greater (on 2 separate days within the 7 day period prior to randomization) with the difference of these scores being 0, 1, 2 or 3. - Patient reports moderate or severe pain (i.e. pain score is 4 or higher). This baseline score must also be stable compared to the most recent pre-baseline pain score with the difference between these scores being 0, 1, 2, or 3. - Blood work obtained within 14 days prior to randomization as follows: - Hemoglobin > 70 g/L; - Platelets > 25 x 10^9/L - Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1.0 x 10^9/L - INR < 3; - Bilirubin < 2.5 UNL (except for subjects with Gilbert's Disease who are eligible despite elevated serum bilirubin level) - AST or ALT < 10 x ULN. - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-3 within 14 days of Randomization (see Appendix II). - Life expectancy of > 3 months. - 18 years of age or older at the time of randomization. - Patient is willing to complete the Pre-Baseline Pain/Discomfort Questionnaire and the Pain/Discomfort and Medication Questionnaire in English, French or other validated language (please contact the HE.1 Study Coordinator). The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines prior to randomization. Unwillingness to complete the Pre-Baseline Pain/Discomfort Questionnaire and Pain/Discomfort and Medication Questionnaire will make the patient ineligible for the study. - Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the QoL questionnaires in English, French or other languages in which the FACT-Hep is available. The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines prior to randomization. Inability (illiteracy in languages listed above, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the QoL questionnaires will make the patient ineligible for QoL assessment. - Patient is not pregnant, planning on becoming pregnant or planning on fathering a child in the next 90 days. Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. A woman is considered to be of "childbearing potential" if she has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, "effective contraception" also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive measures. Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the Pre-Study Evaluation; this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some cancers. Patient will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy - Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each patient must sign a consent form prior to enrolment in the trial to document their willingness to participate; - Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must ensure the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up. - In accordance with NCIC CTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 5 working days of patient randomization (earlier is preferred). Exclusion Criteria: - Prior radiotherapy to the upper abdomen that would result in substantial overlap of the irradiated volume (e.g. > 50% of liver receiving > 24 Gy in 2 Gy equivalent dose); - Prior selective internal radiotherapy directed to the liver or hepatic arterial yttrium therapy, at any time. - Cholangitis or acute bacterial infection requiring intravenous antibiotics within 28 days prior to study entry. - Radiographic evidence of intrabiliary cancer within the common or main branches of the biliary system, < 4 months prior to randomization. - Child-Pugh score greater than C10 (a score of C10 is allowed). - Chemotherapy or TACE administered within the past 4 weeks. - Targeted therapy (e.g. Sorafenib) received within the past 2 weeks. - Plans for chemotherapy, targeted therapy or TACE in the next 4 weeks.

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Best Supportive Care
Including analgesics, palliative care and/or pain specialist assessment as needed
Radiation:
Palliative Radiation Therapy
8 Gy in 1 fraction in whole liver or near whole liver. Including anti-emetic pre-medications

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre Barrie Ontario
Canada Kingston Health Sciences Centre Kingston Ontario
Canada CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal Montreal Quebec
Canada Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario
Canada Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador
Canada University Health Network Toronto Ontario
Canada Centre hospitalier regional de Trois-Rivieres Trois-Rivieres Quebec

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Canadian Cancer Trials Group

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Proportion of patients achieving improvement of liver cancer pain/discomfort • Proportion of patients achieving improvement of liver cancer pain/discomfort by = 2 points in pain "intensity at worst " on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from baseline to day 30. 30 days
Secondary Proportion of patients experiencing grade = 2 adverse events at day 30 and day 90 Day 30 and 90
Secondary Proportion of patients alive at day 90. 90 days
Secondary Proportion of patients achieving improvement of liver cancer pain/discomfort by = 2 points from baseline to day 30 and day 90 in all BPI pain scores. Day 30 and 90
Secondary Proportion of patients reporting clinically significant improvement in QoL from baseline to day 30 and day 90 as defined by a = 5 point change in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Day 30 and 90
Secondary Proportion of patients achieving a 25% reduction in opioid use at 30 days (employing daily morphine equivalence scale). 30 days
Secondary Proportion of patients achieving improvement of liver cancer pain/discomfort by = 2 points in pain "intensity at worst " AND with no increase in opioid use (employing daily morphine equivalence scale) on BPI from baseline to 30 days. 30 days
Secondary Proportion of patients reporting clinically significant improvement in QoL from baseline to day 30 and day 90 as defined by = 5 point change in the Hepatobiliary Subscale (FACT-HBS)Trial Outcome Index (FACT-TOI). Day 30 and 90
Secondary Proportion of patients reporting clinically significant improvement in QoL from baseline to day 30 and day 90 as defined by = 5 point change in the Trial Outcome Index (FACT-TOI). Day 30 and 90
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04209491 - Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
Completed NCT03963206 - Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE) Phase 4
Completed NCT03268499 - TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05263830 - Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
Recruiting NCT05044676 - Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Recruiting NCT05095519 - Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05497531 - Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers N/A
Completed NCT05068193 - A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT03781934 - A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT03655613 - APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03170960 - Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04242199 - Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT04401800 - Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT05418387 - A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04039607 - A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 3
Terminated NCT03970616 - A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06239155 - A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04118114 - Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03642561 - Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03222076 - Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer Phase 2