View clinical trials related to Hemiplegia.
Filter by:Objective: The investigators compared the effectiveness of individual and combined application of conventional rehabilitation and robotic hand rehabilitation in post-stroke hemiplegia. The study design is an An assessor-blinded, prospective randomized comparison study. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1 (Robotic Hand Rehabilitation): The patients underwent robotic hand rehabilitation, Group 2 (Conventional Rehabilitation): The patients underwent conventional rehabilitation, Group 3 (Combined Rehabilitation): The patients underwent combined conventional and robotic hand rehabilitation at the same period. Randomization was performed using the closed envelope method randomization sequence by an investigator who was not involved in patient care. The therapist opened the envelope 6 hours before the patient started treatment. The investigators assessed Barthel index for activities of daily living (range, 0 - 100), Brunnstrom's hemiplegia recovery staging (range, stage 1 - stage 7), Fugl-Meyer upper extremity assessment scale (stage, 0 - 66), Abilhand stroke hand ability questionnaire assessment (range, 0 - 46), hand grip strength, and hand pinch strength at baseline and end of the rehabilitation (1-month). Conclusions: There are many studies in the literature on the hand and upper extremity functions of Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation in stroke. They revealed that both therapies had a positive effect on the results. There is no study on the effect of combined application of Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation on hand and upper extremity functions. More successful hand functional results may be achieved by applying both rehabilitations together in stroke. The aim of our study is to compare the effects of early-term individually and concomitant Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation on hand and upper extremity functions and hand strength in stroke. Our hypothesis is that the combined application of Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation together will provide better functional results of the hand and upper extremity.
Patients with post-stroke hemiplegia may develop balance disorder and limitation in ambulation ability due to multiple mechanisms. The effects of core muscles on maintaining normal posture, balance and ambulation ability are known. The positive effects of core stabilisation exercises on balance in hemiplegic patients have been shown in previous studies. In this study, we planned to investigate the effects of bilateral transversus abdominis and bilateral lumbar multifidus muscles on balance in patients with stroke-related hemiplegia.
Multi-center, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, longitudinal, experimental clinical study to investigate functional recovery effects on the upper limb in chronic stroke patients and the accompanying neural plasticity mechanisms after the application of a brain-computer interface (BCI)-driven functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy supported by an assistive device (hand orthosis). All the equipment used during the study will be applied in compliance with the indications and methods of use for which it is authorized. Therefore, the results will not extend the indications for the use of the equipment and will not explicitly target industrial development. The study is non-profit and is aimed at improving clinical practice. The study involves two clinical centers. The promoting center is the Vipiteno Neurorehabilitation Department, Italy. The aggregate experimentation center is the Neurology Department of Hochzirl Hospital, Austria. The University of Essex, United Kingdom is the technology provider and data analysis center.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in describeparticipant population. The main question it aims to answer is:By using intelligent portable isokinetic tester and traditional isokinetic tester, isokinetic knee flexor and extensor muscles of stroke patients with hemiplegia were trained respectively, so as to observe and compare the effects of the two treatment methods. In addition, the therapeutic effect of the above two treatments was compared with that of exercise therapy alone. Participants will be divided into three groups: control group, intelligent isokinetic treatment group, and traditional isokinetic treatment group. Participants of both the control group and the two treatment groups received exercise therapy. On the basis of exercise therapy, participants of the intelligent isokinetic treatment group used the intelligent portable isokinetic tester to train the affected knee flexion and extensor muscle, while the participants of traditional isokinetic treatment group used the intelligent portable isokinetic tester to train the affected knee flexion and extensor muscle.
This RCT aims to investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnatic stimulation (rTMS) in treating children with hemiplegoc cerebral palsy. The study will measure any improvement in spasticity after using contra-lesional inhibitory rTMS follow by intensive limb training. Participants will attend a 10-day rTMS treatment sessions, follow by intensive training of the impaired limb. They will also undergo MRI scans before and after the treatment to investiagte the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms that lead to changes clinically by using TMS as well as MR-DKI. Researchers will compare the intervention group and the sham group to see if rTMS could result in improvement of participants' spasticity.
Background: Hemiplegia is a common complication after a stroke. Studies have shown that traditional medical and rehabilitation treatments are not good for improving patients' motor function, deep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can improve the motor function of patients, but there is no comparative study between them. Objectives: This study compares the efficacy and safety of DBS and VNS in the recovery of motor function in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, determining the best treatment for patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, and providing high-level clinical evidence for patients and clinicians to choose from. Methods/Design: This is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, cross-controlled pilot study. A total of 98 patients with post-stroke hemiplegia are assigned to receive DBS or VNS. After 3 and 6 months of follow-up, all the devices are turned off. After a 2-week washout, the control group is turned on, but the stimulation group is given sham stimulation. After 9 and 12 months of follow-up, all the devices are turned on. Then, at postoperative 15 and 18 months, postoperative neuroimaging and various post-stroke motor-related scores were performed for data collection and analysis. Discussion: We propose a study design and rationale to compare the efficacy and safety of DBS and VNS in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia to provide evidence and reference for implantable neuromodulation in the treatment of post-stroke dysfunction, and to compare the therapeutic effects of DBS and VNS to provide evidence for patient and clinical diagnosis and treatment choices. Study limitations are related to the small sample size and short study period.
The present clinical investigation - EarlyExo, is an interventional, international, multicentric, prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial. This clinical investigation is designed to test the hypothesis that early and intense introduction of walking sessions assisted by the Atalante exoskeleton, in a sample of hemiparetic patients with still non or poor ambulatory capacities (FAC 0 or 1) between one- and four-months post stroke, would result in a better recovery of functional walking compared to a control group only receiving conventional therapy. Improved recovery will be measured through the proportion of patients reaching a FAC score of 4 or higher at the end of the intervention period. The tested hypothesis is that this proportion will be higher in the Exo group. The duration of the intervention period in both groups is 6 weeks. - For the Exo group: 3 sessions per week (i.e., 18 one-hour sessions) with the Atalante device and 2 sessions per week (i.e., 12 one-hour sessions) of conventional therapy. - For the Control group: 5 sessions per week of conventional therapy (i.e., 30 one-hour sessions). The study will include 66 patients (33 in each arm) and takes place in two French centers, two German centers and one Spanish center.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of upper extremity training, which is expected for 5 seconds on the target during reaching forward, and to compare the effectiveness of neurorehabilitation interventions including reactive upper extremity trainings to be applied with different speeds and methods on body control, balance, gait, fall risk, spasticity, upper extremity fine dexterity, respiratory, and cognitive function in the individuals with stroke. The main questions it aims to answer is: • Is there a difference in the effects of neurorehabilitation interventions that include reactive upper extremity trainings applied at different speeds and methods on trunk control, balance, gait, fall risk, upper extremity spasticity, upper extremity fine dexterity, respiratory function and cognitive function? All participants will participate in the Bobath Approach-based neurorehabilitation program. This program will include scapula mobilization, trunk elongation training in sitting, and training lumbar stabilizers with bridge activity. - In addition to the neurorehabilitation program, the 1st and 2nd groups will be given a reaching exercise with LED light reactive training material (Fitpodz Light Trainer®). The LED light sensors, whose duration is set, will light up in green and red colors at random intervals. - Patients in the 1st group will be asked to reach forward and touch the sensor when the red light sensor is on, and pull back as soon as the sensor goes out. - The patients in the 2nd group will be asked to reach forward and touch the sensor when the green light sensor is lit, and to hold their hand on the sensor for 5 seconds and then withdraw it. With this method, it is aimed to create co-contraction in patients in Group 2. - In addition to the neurorehabilitation program, patients in the 3rd group (control group) will have functional stretches to the anterior, right and left while standing. Researchers will compare three groups to see if there a difference in the effects of neurorehabilitation interventions that include reactive upper extremity trainings applied at different speeds and methods.
Stroke is also known as a brain attack, happens when a blood vessel in the brain breaks or when something stops the flow of blood to a specific area of the brain. Parts of the brain undergo damage or die in either case. Stroke victims may experience permanent brain damage, long-term disability or even death. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of combined auditory and visual rhythmical cueing on lower limb sensorimotor recovery and gait parameters in patients with hemiplegia. It will be a randomized controlled trial. In this study 28 patients will be recruited through non probability convenience sampling technique. The patients fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly divided into experimental group (n=14) and control group (n=14) by using computer engendered in blocks by using a basic number generator. Distribution will be concealed by the sealed envelope method. Baseline treatment will be given to both groups. Baseline treatment includes a range of motion exercises for the lower extremity, passive stretching of tight muscles and conventional march exercises including marching, forward, backward and sideways walking. Conventional training will be given for 15 minutes, 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks. Experimental group (n=14) will be treated with auditory stimulation and visual cues. All participants will undergo the training for 45 minutes per session, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. The control group (n=14) will be treated with auditory stimulation only. All participants will undergo the training for 45 minutes per session, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. Subjective tool for sensory assessment includes Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for the lower extremity (LE) tool. For gait, it includes Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) tool. Objective tools will include cadence, gait velocity/walking speed, stride length, step length, step width, stride length symmetry ratio and step length symmetry ratio. Data will be analyzed by using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 23 version.
A stroke is a significant contributor to functional decline and long-term disability. The reduction of obesity and improvement in quality of life are directly correlated. Many post-stroke patients experience persistent upper extremity dysfunction. The study aims to compare cross-education non-paretic limb training versus mirror therapy on upper limb strength and dexterous movement of hand in stroke survivors This randomized clinical trial will be conducted at DHQ Hospital Sargodha over a duration of six months. The sample size will consist of 26 participants. Participants which meet the inclusion criteria will be selected through Non probability convenience sampling technique, which will further be randomized through computer engendered in blocks by using basic number generator.13 participants will be assigned to Cross education group and 13 participants will be assigned to Mirror Therapy group. Data will be using various assessment tools, including the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) for functional limitation, Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity (FMA-UE), Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) for hand dexterity and function. Hand held dynamometer will be used for Grip Strength Test. Pre intervention assessment will be conducted for both groups. The effects of intervention will be measured at pretreatment ,3rd week and post intervention. Data analysis will be performed by using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 23 version.