Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05541068 |
Other study ID # |
PIC172-19_FJD |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 26, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
March 29, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2022 |
Source |
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Patients with heart failure (HF) have poor prognosis with high mortality and readmission
rates. Diuretic therapy is the usual way of managing congestion, but sometimes is difficult
to determine when we have reached euvolemia. Even in overweight and obese patients in which
physical examination and usual diagnostic techniques have strong limitations. The aim of this
study is to investigate the usefulness of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in
management and treatment of HF in overweight and obese patients.
The study included overweight and obese patients who were admitted with acute decompensated
HF. The study population was randomized into two arms: BIA-guided therapy or standard care.
Serum electrolytes, kidney functions and natriuretic peptides were followed up during their
hospital stay and at 90 days after discharge.
The primary endpoint was development of acute kidney injury (AKI) stage III (AKIN-III) during
hospitalization and the main secondary endpoint was the reduction of NT-proBNP (N-terminal
pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels during hospitalization and within 90 days after
discharge.
Description:
Design: This study was designed as a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial
conducted at Hospital Fundación Jimenez Diaz (Madrid, Spain) from February 2020 to December
2021. It is a pilot study which has the objective of obtaining significant results in order
to conduct a major research in the future with the purpose of including broadly the use of
BIA in HF management. This study was approved by an institutional review committee and
performed under Helsinki Declaration Guidelines. All patients provided written informed
consent to participate.
Study Procedures All patients included in the study were measured weight and height at
admission, and blood tests with hemogram and serum biochemistry including cardiac biomarkers
such as NT-proBNP and troponin I were also ordered.
In the first 24 hours after admission an echocardiogram, a lung ultrasound (LUS) and a BIA
were done in all patients. BIA was always performed by nephrologists from our hospital not
involved in the patient's clinical care. BIA analysis to achieve assessments of fluid status,
especially dry-weight, was performed with the portable Biomasc touch i8 (MaltronInternationl,
Essex, UK). During the hospitalization period, blood parameters were measured according to
standard clinical practice in all patients, with the condition of taking a blood chemistry
including NT-proBNP on the day of discharge.
All patients were followed up for 90 days with a new complete blood test including NT-proBNP.
Eligible patients were randomized into two groups:
- Group I (study arm): included 24 patients who received a diuretic treatment guided by
BIA. These patients were discharged when dry-weight was achieved according to BIA
measurements if there was none clinical condition which justified the hospitalization.
- Group II (control arm): included 24 patients who received the standard clinical
practice. In those patients, BIA parameters were not known by the physician responsible.
These patients were discharged when they achieved the euvolemic state based in the
criteria of their physician.
Outcomes Given the pilot nature of the study the investigators looked for a feasible,
clinically meaningful, in-hospital outcome. Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) during
hospitalization, defined as an increase in serum creatinine by >0.5 mg/dL (AKIN
classification stage III), was the primary outcome. Patients were followed for at least 3
months after discharge. The first secondary outcome was the percentage of patients who
achieved levels of NT-proBNP levels <1.000 pg/mL within 90 days after discharge.
Additional secondary outcomes included length of stay in hospital, NT-proBNP reduction >30%
during hospitalization, and the combined endpoint of all-cause death, rehospitalization for
HF or visit to the ED (emergency department) because of congestion symptoms measured at 90
days after discharge. Patients were contacted by telephone or returned for hospital or
outpatient visits.
Statistical analysis Discrete variables were summarized as counts and percentages. Continuous
variables were described using median and interquartile range (IQR)and were tested for
normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Shapiro-Wilk test.Baseline characteristics were
compared among standard treatment vs BIA-guided treatment with the chi-square test or
Fisher´s test for discrete variables, and with Student´s t test and non-parametric
Mann-Whitney test for normally and non-normally distributed quantitative variables
respectively. Primary and secondary outcomes were also compared between both treatment groups
using a chi-square test for independence.Results of these analyses were considered
exploratory to study future differences between the groups in terms of time to first adverse
outcome or event-free survival. A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be
statistically significant for all analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using
SPSS for Windows Version 19.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk NY).