Heart Failure Clinical Trial
— RFOfficial title:
Compatibility of Radiofrequency Detection Technology With Cardiac Internal Electronic Devices (RF Assure Study)
NCT number | NCT02111980 |
Other study ID # | 131198 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 2014 |
Est. completion date | May 2015 |
Verified date | December 2019 |
Source | University of California, San Diego |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
If a surgical sponge is mistakenly left inside a patient's body after a surgical procedure,
it can cause a serious infection. To prevent this from happening, a new device has been
developed that uses radiofrequency (RF) signals to detect the presence of surgical sponges
inside the body. The device is now being used routinely to make sure that no sponges are left
inside a patient at the end of an operation. However, the RF device has not been implemented
in procedures for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). While the
device is FDA approved for use, there is a theoretical concern that the radiofrequency
signals used to detect the sponges will change the settings on the pacemaker or the
defibrillator. Changing the settings on a pacemaker might make it pace the heart too quickly
or too slowly, while changing the settings on a defibrillator might cause unnecessary shocks
or prevent it from shocking the heart if the patient were to have cardiac arrest.
The purpose of this study is to test whether the radiofrequency device used to detect sponges
can cause a clinically significant change to the settings on pacemakers and defibrillators.
To minimize potential risk, the device will be tested only on patients who are having the
pacemaker or defibrillator removed or replaced as part of their regular medical care, either
because it is infected or because the battery has worn out. Before the pacemaker or
defibrillator is removed, the settings will be carefully and completely recorded and the
radiofrequency device will be used to scan the body for sponges as it would be done during
normal operation.
After the pacemaker or defibrillator is taken out, the settings will again be recorded and
compared to the settings before the scan. In a standard device removal procedure, no
clinically significant change in CIED settings would be expected. If a new pacemaker or
defibrillator is implanted in the patient, it will not be exposed to the detection device at
all. We will also test whether the RF device has any effect on temporary pacemakers that
patients may receive after open heart surgery. We plan to perform testing in a total of 50
patients, 40 with permanent pacemakers or defibrillators and 10 with temporary pacemakers.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | May 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients must be at least 18 years of age - Patients must be willing and able to provide consent - Patients must be eligible for pacemaker/ICD removal or temporary pacemaker Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy - Inability or unwillingness to comply with the protocol - Medical condition that would limit study participation |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | UCSD Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center | La Jolla | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of California, San Diego | RF Surgical Systems, Inc. |
United States,
Cima RR, Kollengode A, Garnatz J, Storsveen A, Weisbrod C, Deschamps C. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jul;207(1):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.047. Epub 2008 May 23. — View Citation
Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A, Weinberg A, Curty J, Rabin-Fastman B, Kaplan H, Cooper M, Fowler D, Emond JC, Greco G. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Ann Surg. 2008 Jan;247(1):13-8. — View Citation
Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 16;348(3):229-35. — View Citation
Steelman VM, Alasagheirin MH. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity. Arch Surg. 2012 Oct;147(10):955-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1556. — View Citation
Steelman VM. Sensitivity of detection of radiofrequency surgical sponges: a prospective, cross-over study. Am J Surg. 2011 Feb;201(2):233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.05.001. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pacing Mode Changes Between Permanent Pacemakers (PPMs)/Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned With RF Assure | The Pacing Mode on the CIED was measured prior to RF scanning (with sponge) and after the scanning (after sponge removal) in order to evaluate if any significant changes in the pacing mode setting resulted. The following CIED modes were evaluated: DDD (dual chamber pacing, sensing, triggered and inhibited mode), VVI (ventricular pacing, sensing, and inhibited mode), DDI (dual pacing, sensing, and inhibited mode), AAI (atrial pacing, sensing, and inhibited mode). The number of patients' device mode switched between these settings was tabulated and is shown in the below table. Multiple post-scan assessments were not made. | Baseline and 15 minutes | |
Primary | Pacing Polarity Changes With Permanent Pacemakers (PPMs)/Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned With RF Assure | The patient's pacing polarity was measured prior to scanning with sponge and after scanning with sponge via device interrogation. The following pacing polarity measurements were evaluated: right atrium/right ventricle (RA/RV) bipolar polarity, left ventricle (LV) bipolar polarity, and left ventricle (LV) unipolar polarity. Note that not all study patients had LV leads implanted. Multiple post-scan assessments were not made. | Baseline and 15 minutes | |
Primary | Base Rate Measurement Changes With Permanent Pacemakers (PPMs)/Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned w/ RF Assure | The base rate on patients' devices was measured before scanning with sponge and after RF scanning with sponge. The median was determined and is presented below with standard deviation for both times. Multiple post-scan assessments were not made. | Baseline and 15 minutes | |
Primary | Max Tracking Rate Changes With Permanent Pacemakers (PPMs)/Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned With RF Assure | The max tracking rate on the CIEDs was measured prior to scanning with the sponge and post scanning with sponge. The max tracking rate is the maximum atrial rate at which a pacemaker will deliver a ventricular pacing stimulus following each sensed atrial beat. Below, the median and standard deviation are presented. Please note that multiple post-scan assessments were not made for any patient. | Baseline and 15 minutes | |
Primary | Atrio-ventricular (AV) Delay Changes With Permanent Pacemakers (PPMs)/Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned With RF Assure | The atrio-ventricular delay was measured prior to scanning with sponge and post RF scanning with sponge. Please note that multiple post-scan assessments were not made for any of the patients presented here. | Baseline and 15 minutes | |
Primary | Battery Capacity Changes With Permanent Pacemakers (PPMs)/Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned With RF Assure | Of the patients enrolled, battery capacity changes were measured prior to and post RF scanning with sponge. Multiple post-scan assessments were not made for any of the patients presented here. | Baseline and 15 minutes | |
Primary | Pacing Impedance Changes With Permanent Pacemakers (PPMs)/Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned With RF Assure | The impedance values of right ventricle (RV), right atrium (RA), and left ventricle (LV) leads was measured prior to RF scanning with sponge and post RF scanning with sponge. Multiple post-scan assessments were not made for any patient represented here. | Baseline and 15 minutes | |
Primary | Shock Impedance Changes With Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned With RF Assure | The shock impedance changes were measured (right ventricle (RV) coil and superior vena cava (SVC) coil) prior to and post RF scanning with sponge. This was measured by performing a device interrogation in the electrophysiology (EP) lab. Multiple post-scan measurements were not taken for any of the patients presented here. | Baseline and 15 minutes | |
Primary | Changes in P & R Wave Measurements in Permanent Pacemakers (PPMs)/Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned With RF Assure | The P and R waves were measured via device interrogation prior to and post RF scanning with sponge. Multiple post-scan measurements were not made for any of the participants represented here. | Baseline and 15 minutes | |
Primary | Capture Threshold Changes With Permanent Pacemakers (PPMs)/Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) Scanned With RF Assure | Via device interrogation, capture threshold changes (the minimum amount of electricity that the box has to emit to pace the heart) were measured prior to and post RF Scanning with sponge. Multiple post-scan measurements were not taken for any participants presented here. | Baseline and 15 minutes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05650307 -
CV Imaging of Metabolic Interventions
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05196659 -
Collaborative Quality Improvement (C-QIP) Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05654272 -
Development of CIRC Technologies
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05896904 -
Clinical Comparison of Patients With Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05077293 -
Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations - Heart Failure
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05631275 -
The Role of Bioimpedance Analysis in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Systolic Ventricular Dysfunction
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05564572 -
Randomized Implementation of Routine Patient-Reported Health Status Assessment Among Heart Failure Patients in Stanford Cardiology
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05009706 -
Self-care in Older Frail Persons With Heart Failure Intervention
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04177199 -
What is the Workload Burden Associated With Using the Triage HF+ Care Pathway?
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03615469 -
Building Strength Through Rehabilitation for Heart Failure Patients (BISTRO-STUDY)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06340048 -
Epicardial Injection of hiPSC-CMs to Treat Severe Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05679713 -
Next-generation, Integrative, and Personalized Risk Assessment to Prevent Recurrent Heart Failure Events: the ORACLE Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT04254328 -
The Effectiveness of Nintendo Wii Fit and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Older Patients With Heart Failure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03549169 -
Decision Making for the Management the Symptoms in Adults of Heart Failure
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05572814 -
Transform: Teaching, Technology, and Teams
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05538611 -
Effect Evaluation of Chain Quality Control Management on Patients With Heart Failure
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04262830 -
Cancer Therapy Effects on the Heart
|
||
Completed |
NCT06026683 -
Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03091998 -
Subcu Administration of CD-NP in Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05564689 -
Absolute Coronary Flow in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Block With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
|