Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to investigate whether the investigators can improve heart function in patients with heart failure who have undergone cardiac resynchronization therapy, but have not had an improvement in their heart function at least one year after the procedure. The investigators will evaluate whether placing a new pacing lead (electrode) in a different part of the heart may increase heart function and decrease heart failure symptoms.


Clinical Trial Description

Heart failure is one of the leading causes of death, hospitalization and poor quality of life among Veterans. For many Veterans despite receiving maximal medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), their cardiac function and functional capacity markedly decreases and they develop delays and blocks in their intrinsic conduction system (i.e. left bundle branch block). These patients then meet criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), which has been shown to improve cardiac function. However, up to 40% of patients who undergo CRT do not experience the expected improvement in cardiac function or clinical improvement, and this is termed "non-response". A critical limitation of traditional CRT is that the leads do not directly utilize the heart's intrinsic conduction tissue, called the His-Purkinje system. An extensive web of conduction tissue capable of transmitting the electrical signals all over the ventricles within milliseconds, the His-Purkinje system conducts electrical stimuli much faster than conduction through a usual myocardial cell. The left bundle branch is a component of the His-Purkinje system. As such, electrophysiologic therapies that directly activate the left bundle branch area (LBBAP) have emerged as possible solutions to the problem of non-response to CRT. Although data suggests that in patients with complete LBBB, LBBAP can better optimize electrical synchrony and improve cardiac function compared to traditional bi-ventricular CRT, the efficacy has not been studied in CRT non-responders. Currently, the most frequently used technique for assessment of the left ventricle is echocardiography because it is widely available. However, several studies have demonstrated that cardiac MRI (CMR) is superior to echocardiography in measuring left ventricle ejection fraction, particularly in terms of interstudy reproducibility. Recent studies have also demonstrated CMR imaging to be safe even in patients with non-MRI-conditional pacemakers and defibrillators. Studies have also observed that patients undergoing MRI with non-MRI-conditional pacemakers or ICDs neither experienced device/lead failure nor were they at increased risk by undergoing MRI. Despite established safety of CMR in patients with cardiac devices, it is not being routinely performed because there are concerns that the devices will cause field inhomogeneity resulting in magnetic susceptibility artifacts and non-diagnostic image quality. However, these concerns are overcome by utilizing contemporary imaging protocols with gradient echo sequences as opposed to standard steady-state free precession. By using these new protocols for CMR in this study, the investigators aim to establish the feasibility of CMR to prospectively assess cardiac function at baseline and during follow-up in patients with cardiac devices (i.e. that the image quality in subjects with implantable devices is adequate and not undermined by image artifact). ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05884411
Study type Interventional
Source VA Office of Research and Development
Contact Selma D Carlson, MD
Phone (612) 467-3662
Email selma.carlson@va.gov
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date April 30, 2023
Completion date March 31, 2028

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05077293 - Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations - Heart Failure
Completed NCT03614169 - Direct HIS-pacing as an Alternative to BiV-pacing in Symptomatic HFrEF Patients With True LBBB N/A
Recruiting NCT05278962 - HF Patients With LVADs Being Treated With SGLT2i Phase 4
Completed NCT04210375 - Study of JK07 in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) Phase 1
Completed NCT05001165 - Dashboard Activated Services and Tele-Health for Heart Failure N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03701880 - Early Use of Ivabradine in Heart Failure N/A
Recruiting NCT05650658 - Left vs Left Randomized Clinical Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05992116 - Iron Deficiency in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
Recruiting NCT05365568 - Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Randomized Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05204238 - Follow Up of acuTe Heart failUre: a pRospective Echocardiographic and Clinical Study (FUTURE)
Not yet recruiting NCT04420065 - Effects of Preferential Left Ventricular Pacing on Ventriculoarterial Coupling and Clinical Course of Heart Failure N/A
Terminated NCT03479424 - Home Outpatient Monitoring and Engagement to Predict HF Exacerbation
Completed NCT02113033 - VAgal Nerve Stimulation: safeGUARDing Heart Failure Patients Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03209180 - Immediate Release Versus Slow Release Carvedilol in Heart Failure Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05299879 - Screening for Advanced Heart Failure IN Stable ouTpatientS - The SAINTS Study
Recruiting NCT05637853 - Telemonitored Fast Track Medical Sequencing for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Completed NCT03870074 - CPET Predicts Long-term Survival and Positive Response to CRT
Recruiting NCT04590001 - Effect of the MobiusHD® in Patients With Heart Failure N/A
Recruiting NCT05072054 - Comparison of Effects of Atorvastatin Versus Rosuvastatin on Cardiac Function in Heart Failure Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT06233695 - Gender-based Differences in the Outcome of Treatment With Aldosterone Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure