View clinical trials related to Fractures, Bone.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is compare the rates of post-operative delirium between a group of people receiving intravenous (IV) pain control after hip fracture surgery and a group of people receiving a femoral nerve catheter for pain control. Post-operative delirium is confusion that can happen after the deep sleep of anesthesia. AThe hypothesis is that the group receiving the femoral nerve catheter for pain may have a lower incidence of delirium than the group receiveing IV pain medication.
This research study is a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo controlled trial evaluating the benefit of IV acetaminophen (Ofirmev™) as adjuvant analgesia in geriatric hip fracture patients. IV acetaminophen has received FDA approval. IV acetaminophen does not have the liver toxicity as oral acetaminophen. No oral acetaminophen will be administered. All patients diagnosed with a hip fracture aged at least 65 years and expected to undergo surgical intervention are eligible to participate. Hip fractures affect greater than 300,000 geriatric patients annually, representing the second leading cause of hospitalization for this patient population. Pain control in these patients is often problematic due to co-morbidities and changes in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Subjects may receive the normal DVT prophylactic treatments post-op.
The purpose of the research is to perform a quality assurance evaluation using randomized prospective analysis the rate of orbital cellulitis as a complication of nonsurgical orbital blowout fracture in patients treated versus not treated with prophylactic antibiotics. The investigators goal is to show the use of prophylactic antibiotics in orbital blowout fractures does not significantly decrease the rate of orbital cellulitis and is thus not indicated.
Bone fractures heal most of the time particularly well and without complications. The solidification takes rarely more than two to three months. The wound healing depends greatly on a good blood supply and needs several steps. These processes culminate in a new mass of heterogeneous tissue which is known as the fracture callus. Unfortunately, 2%-5% bone fractures cannot achieve a proper solidification and between the ununited fragments a scar tissue appears. This incorrect healing induces pain and even infections. When this situation persists more than 6 months, it is referred to as nonunion fracture, which will require some form of intervention to stimulate the natural healing process of the body. First of all, good surgical techniques with stable immobilization should be applied and local infection should be excluded. Then stimulation of the callus is required. Cell therapy with bone marrow cells has emerged as a promising new approach for bone regeneration. Animal studies as well as preliminary human studies have shown that Mesenchymal Stem Cells, a particular kind of stem cells isolated from the bone marrow, could induce callus formation when injected in the nonunion site of a broken bone. In this study the investigators aim at determining whether Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) isolated from the patient's bone marrow and injected in the nonunion site could be a safe and effective treatment for nonunion fractures. Patients will be randomized in two groups; one injected with Mesenchymal Stem Cell and the other injected with placebo. The investigators seek also to know how long it takes to develop the callus formation and whether there is a partial or a complete callus formation.
The objective of this post market clinical study is to collect prospective clinical data to confirm the efficacy of RF Kyphoplasty for the treatment of pathological fractures of the spine caused by multiple myeloma.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the volume of injected ciment (polymethyl methacrylate) between a group of patients treated with vertebroplasty and a group of patients treated via kyphoplasty. Secondary evaluation will compare the restoration of vertebral height, volume and cyphotic angle between the two techniques, as well as extravation of ciment and functional and quality of life aspects related to these techniques.
Patients with acute, displaced fractures of the middle third of the clavicle will be randomly assigned into either the non-operative treatment group or the operative treatment group. The operative treatment group will be randomly assigned to repair with either an intramedullary device or a plate and screws.
Until recently, clavicle fractures have been treated mainly with a sling or brace and felt to have favorable outcomes. Recently, however, data has been published suggesting that these injuries are not as harmless as once thought and, if treated without surgery, may result in lasting functional deficits. As a result, surgery for clavicle fractures is becoming increasingly more accepted as a better treatment option. There are two basic methods of operative treatment. The first involves placement of a metal rod within the middle of the clavicle through a small incision in the skin. Proponents of this technique believe that it has improved cosmetic outcome because of a smaller incision, less post operative pain, and possibly a faster return to activity when compared to other surgical treatments. The second method involves making a larger incision over the clavicle, exposing a large portion of the bone, and fixing the fracture with a plate and screws. Proponents of this method cite better stablity and a decreased risk of the hardware migrating from its intended position among other advantages. This study would propose to determine if these two methods of fracture fixation are necessary and if so, which would provide better outcomes following their use in selected patients.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Toremifene Citrate is effective in reducing the risk of bone fractures in men with prostate cancer who are on Androgen Deprivation Therapy.
About 90% of chest injuries in America are due to blunt forces, mostly as a result of motor vehicle collisions and falls. Severity varies from minor bruising to severe chest injuries. For several years, clavicle ("collarbone") fractures have been treated without surgery (non-operatively), even when the fracture is out of place (displaced). Over the last few years, however, treatment has changed more towards surgical fixation (operative), because of the sometimes difficult healing in clavicle fractures that are displaced. Several research studies have shown that cases in which the clavicle fracture never heals completely (non-union) are more frequent after nonoperative treatment, compared to operative fixation. In those cases, surgery is still required, only later (secondary surgery). Further, clavicle malunion, in which the fracture heals but is still out of place) has been shown to be high after nonoperative treatment. Recent published research studies have shown better function, higher patient satisfaction, earlier return to activity (use of the arm) and decreased nonunion and malunion following surgery, also called open reduction/internal fixation. Despite recent published research, there is still a lack of agreement on when surgical fixation should be performed for clavicle fractures. Patients with chest injuries often have clavicle fractures. Chest injuries can restrict patients' ability to breathe, cough, stand, walk and leave the hospital. Although it is unusual that chest injuries can be improved with surgery, patients with clavicle fractures and chest injuries might recover faster if the clavicle fractures were repaired. Patients are being asked to take part in the study they have sustained a clavicle fracture associated with a chest injury with or without any other injury to the abdomen, or arms or legs. The aim of this study is to determine the difference in the hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, respiratory rehabilitation (recovery of good respiratory function), functional outcome, ability to become mobile again, complications and risk of dying in trauma patients with chest injury and clavicle fracture treated operatively versus non-operatively.