Clinical Trials Logo

Fractures, Bone clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Fractures, Bone.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04095611 Completed - Hip Fracture Clinical Trials

A Modified Muscle Sparing Posterior Technique (SPAIRE) in Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsular Fractures.

HemiSPAIRE
Start date: November 25, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Which technique is best for partial hip replacement?

NCT ID: NCT04093856 Completed - Obesity Clinical Trials

Determinants of Bone and Muscle Quality and Strength in Obesity With and Without Diabetes

BODI2
Start date: January 14, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Background: Osteoporotic fractures are a major public health issue. They cause substantial disability, loss of autonomy, morbidity and excess mortality. Diabetes is also associated with increased risk for falls and fractures through a direct impact of elevated blood glucose on the skeleton and on muscles. Research project overview: The investigators propose a cross-sectional study that will involve 2 research centers in the province of Quebec. The investigators will recruit 20 obese participants, without diabetes, who have not undergone bariatric surgery, for one-time measurements to be compared with baseline measurements (pre-surgery) from participants in the bariatric obese diabetic groups with type II diabetes mellitus from the ongoing study BODI study (NCT03455868). Bone Mineral Density as well as muscle quality, strength and function will be evaluated at a single study visit. Relevance: This data will permit the evaluation of the bone-muscle unit in patients with obesity with and without diabetes, and assess whether the presence and duration of diabetes impacts further on clinical and functional musculoskeletal outcomes (falls, fractures and mobility and strength) in this population. AGEs, if associated with muscle and bone deterioration, might become an easily accessible biomarker of musculoskeletal health in the clinical setting.

NCT ID: NCT04081233 Completed - Clinical trials for Rib Fracture Multiple

Surgical Stabilization for Rib Fractures

SSRF
Start date: February 23, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the usual care alone to usual care plus early surgical stabilization in adult trauma patients who have been admitted with rib fractures, to evaluate for heterogeneity of treatment effect in high risk subgroups and to determine the the impact of multiple rib fractures on post-discharge health status and time to return to work or usual physical activity.

NCT ID: NCT04074876 Completed - Femur Fracture Clinical Trials

Utility of Pulmonary Echography for Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery for Femur Fracture

LUSHIP
Start date: December 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The stratification of perioperative risk is an essential moment in the preoperative evaluation of the patient undergoing surgery especially in the setting of urgency. There is a very broad group of indexes used in the stratification of preoperative risk, like ASA-PS (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status), RCRI (Revised Cardiac Risk Index) and NSQIP MICA (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest). The role of some laboratory markers such as BNP has also been demonstrated. The fundamental point of all these scores is cardiocirculatory compensation. There are concerns about the value of certain preoperative exams, especially in an urgent setting. Of them all, mostly chest X-ray is questioned. Chest X-ray, indeed, needs special costs, not always short execution times and the need for X-ray exposition. Furthermore, its utility is questionable in asymptomatic patients, in which there are often no alterations to be detected. Sensibility, for Thorax x-ray, is 41% for apical flow inversion, 27% for interstitial and 6% for alveolar oedema. In chronic decompensated patients, radiographic signs of congestion have a small diagnostic accuracy, being absent in 53% of patients with capillary pulmonary pressure between 16 and 29 mmHg and in 39% of those with wedge pressure more of 30 mmHg. Pulmonary echography is a known method, that has different possible applications in diagnosis of the lung parenchymal and pleural disease. Lung is made up for 80% of water. Extravascular lung water is physiologically less than 500 ml and it increases in the case of pathology. Augmentation of this water is detected reliably by echography. B-lines are an echographic artefact that allows recognition of interstitial syndrome, having a sensibility of 93,4% and specificity of 93%. Presence of 3 or more of B-lines in 2 out of 4 fields of each hemithorax can identify a cardiac problem like pulmonary sub-oedema or chronic heart failure and it is known as Diffuse Interstitial Syndrome. Thorax X-ray, instead, detects these situations only when extravascular water exceeds 30%. That's why echography has been proposed as a method for evaluation of extravascular pulmonary water. Moreover, when lung air component is lost enough in subpleural area, it is possible to find little consolidations. A method of reporting different grades of loss of aeration of the lung (normal pattern, isolated B lines, coalescent B lines and consolidation) has been proposed as a tool for monitoring the aeration itself. Pleural effusion is another sign that echography could detect. It is perfectly transonic and easy to see. Also, in this case, therefore, ultrasound is superior to X-ray, that has got sensibility, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 67%, 70% and 67% respectively. All this information could provide useful elements for preoperative patient management. Echography, indeed, is a bedside and real-time method, that can give rapid information about the cardiocirculatory situation of patients. Using this method, that is non-invasive and easy, useful elements could be obtained, that could contribute to a better overview of clinical conditions of the patient in the preoperative setting. In the particular field of urgency and, among all, in the setting of orthopaedic urgency for femur fracture, there is a need for a more rapid and comprehensive evaluation, giving that the patient has to be operated within 24-48 hours. This timing is often incompatible with a long and time-consuming evaluation of the patients. Furthermore, a complete cardiologic examination is beyond the requirements of international guidelines for intermediate surgery, since it doesn't change the perioperative management. In this particular setting, hence, pulmonary echography could represent a more reliable and easier tool compared to thorax X-ray, often performed in non-optimal conditions (supine position, only anteroposterior chest X-ray). In recent studies, percentage of major adverse cardiovascular events (atrial fibrillation, flutter, acute heart failure and non-fatal acute myocardial infarction) after hip fracture has settled around 24.8%. This data confirms the importance of a valid preoperative stratification in this setting. From this perspective, this study aims to evaluate the utility of pulmonary echography as a preoperative method of investigation. The principal aim is to evaluate the utility of the pulmonary echography in predicting the risk of patients undergoing urgent surgery for femur fracture. Alternative objectives are: - Evaluate the predictability of LUS (lung ultrasound score) on the occurrence of MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events) - Verify feasibility of echographic evaluation in the estimation of fluid tolerance of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. - Evaluation of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC)

NCT ID: NCT04068935 Completed - Fracture Finger Clinical Trials

Buddy Taping Compared to Splint Immobilization for Displaced Paediatric Finger Fractures

Start date: August 20, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Fracture immobilization with Buddy taping is not inferior to Splint immobilization for non-displaced extra-articular paediatric finger fractures. However, whether the same applies for reduced finger fractures is unclear.

NCT ID: NCT04064437 Completed - Clinical trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Prevalence of Vertebral Fractures in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

DenSiFy
Start date: July 29, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Background : Type 1 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of fractures. The mechanisms accounting for this bone fragility are not yet fully understood. The lower bone mineral density (BMD) observed in individuals with type 1 diabetes cannot solely explain the higher fracture incidence. Bone microarchitecture defects significantly contribute to bone fragility. Few studies assessed spine fractures in type 1 diabetes. This cross-sectional multicenter case-control study aims (1) to evaluate the prevalence of asymptomatic vertebral fractures in individuals with type 1 diabetes in comparison to age- and sex-matched healthy controls; (2) to compare individuals with diabetes with vertebral fractures and those without vertebral fracture using clinical, biochemical and radiological parameters.

NCT ID: NCT04062110 Completed - Radius Fractures Clinical Trials

Below-elbow or Above-elbow Cast for Extra-articular Distal Radius Fractures

UNIFE/GC01
Start date: June 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this prospective randomised study was to shed more light on the issue by comparing the capacity of long plaster casts (above-elbow, LC) and short plaster casts (below-elbow, SC) to maintain the reduction of extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal displacement (2R3A2.2, according to the AO/OTA classification). The initial hypothesis was that the short cast would be equally as effective as the long cast in treating this type of fracture. The secondary objective of the study was to determine whether or not there is a direct correlation between radiological parameters and functional outcomes in such patients.

NCT ID: NCT04056351 Completed - Clinical trials for Proximal Humeral Fracture

A Research Study to Understand and Predict the Failure of Shoulder Fracture Fixations Using Computer Simulations

PHILOS-SIM
Start date: August 2, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Fractures of the shoulder, the so-called proximal humeral fractures, can be treated with locking plates that have shown good results in clinical practice, but complications can occur. In order to further improve the treatment of proximal humerus fractures and decrease the rate of fixation failures, further research is necessary. As a first step, the reasons for potential implant failures need to be understood. This study has been initiated by scientists at the AO Research Institute Davos (ARI), Switzerland, which is the research center of the AO Foundation (www.aofoundation.org), an international non-profit organization led by surgeons specialized in fractures such as these. Researchers at the ARI have been developing a computational simulation tool to predict fixation failure and demonstrated its efficiency in laboratory conditions. This clinical study has been organised to validate this tool using patient data, by comparing the risk of mechanical failure predicted by the computer simulated model with the clinically observed fixation failure. In future, this computer simulation tool is expected to help surgeons to select the best fixation for a given patient and to develop improved implants.

NCT ID: NCT04037540 Completed - Clinical trials for Fracture of Fifth Metatarsal Bone

Comparison of Conservative and Operative Treatment of Jones Fracture

Start date: January 1, 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study deals with the topic of treatment of Jones fracture, comparing surgical and conservative approach. The fracture occurs especially in highly active individuals.

NCT ID: NCT04032873 Completed - Clinical trials for Distal Radius Fracture

Distal Radius Buckle Fracture RCT

Start date: May 31, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates the influence of cost information on decision-making for immobilization for treatment of distal radial buckle fractures. Half of the participants will receive cost information from an orthopaedic surgeon prior to making their decision for treatment, while the other half will receive cost information from another member of the study team after they had made their decision treatment.