View clinical trials related to Exposure.
Filter by:The goal of this study is to evaluate one session with exposure with Virtual Reality (VR) in in children and adolescents, aged 8-18 years with an anxiety disorder. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What are the expectations of children and adolescents and therapists with VR exposure? 2. What is the acceptability of the VR session (positive and negative effects)? 3. What are possible working mechanisms of VR exposure? During ongoing treatment, participants will receive a session of exposure with VR.
The Cohort on Plant-based Diets (COPLANT) study is a multi-centre cohort study that starts baseline recruitment from 2024 to 2027 with approximately 6,000 participants in Germany and Austria. The COPLANT study focuses on vegan (no animal products), vegetarian (no meat and fish, but dairy products and eggs), pescetarian (no meat, but fish) and omnivorous (mixed diet including all possible animal products) diets. The aim of the COPLANT study is to gain new insights on health benefits and risks as well as social, ecological and economic effects of different plant-based diets in comparison to a mixed diet. In addition to a detailed dietary survey using an app adapted to the needs of this study, the baseline examination includes measurements of body composition, bone health, cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes risk, contaminants and lifestyle. For the basic laboratory program, fasting blood, 24-hour urine collection and a stool sample are taken from all study participants. Furthermore, specific aspects of dietary behavior, physical activity and other lifestyle factors are collected via questionnaires. Follow-up studies are planned at intervals of 5, 10 and 20 years after the baseline visit.
This study evaluates how synthetic cooling additives like WS-3 and WS-23 impact e-cigarette perceptions, use behavior, and toxicant exposure.
The goal of this research is to test interventions to reduce firefighter cardiovascular, cognitive, and overall disease risks, including but not limited to risks associated with Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAS) exposure. Approximately 1,500 - 2,000 firefighters will be enrolled in the Fire Fighter Cancer Cohort Study (FFCCS). Among these individuals, those that express interest will then be screened for eligibility for the Firefighter Collaborative Research Project (FCRP) using information they provided for the Fire Fighter Cancer Cohort Study. Firefighters enrolled in the study will provide an initial blood sample and urine sample. The blood sample will be analyzed to determine the participant's PFAS levels. Based upon serum PFAS levels and responses from the screening survey, eligible participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following interventions: 1. Blood Donation, or Plasma Donation or Blood/Plasma Control Group; 2. Zone 2 Training or Zone 2 Control; 3. Intermittent Fasting or Intermittent Fasting Control. Individuals participating in the blood donation, plasma donation or blood/plasma control group would donate blood every 12 weeks, plasma every 6 weeks, or not donate blood or plasma. Participants in this intervention arm would continue this for a 12-month period. Individuals in the zone 2 training, zone 2 training control, intermittent fasting or intermittent fasting control group would participate in their intervention or control for a 4-month period. After 4 to 12 months participating in an intervention or control group, participants will be asked to provide a final urine sample and blood draw to determine if and to what degree their PFAS levels or other cardiovascular disease and other health risks have changed.
The objective of the PATHOME study is to (1) develop statistical and computational methods for examining a complex disease system of interactions between and amongst children, animals, the environment, and enteric pathogens and (2) build a virtual laboratory for predicting which social and environmental developmental improvements best prevents multi-pathogen transmission to infants in urbanizing areas of high disease burden countries. Investigators will characterize how social and environmental development of urban neighborhoods in disease endemic settings modifies the "enteric pathome", i.e. the microbial communities of viral, bacterial, and protozoan pathogens transmitted by human and animal feces in the environment to infants. They will measure the impact of societal development on pathogen transmission to infants by applying a One Health ecosystem-based approach to characterizing interactions between enteric pathome agents in the environment and their transmission via interactions between infants, caregivers (CGs), animals, and environmental materials across domestic and public spaces and climate conditions. Data-validated statistical and computational models can quantify pathogen-specific attributable risk of infection through multiple pathways, and the extent that these risks are due to pathogen interactions with each other and the environment. The overall study hypothesis is that joint modeling of enteric pathome agents across urban households and neighborhoods representing transitional improvements in societal development will show that development leads to lower pathogen-specific detection frequencies, and thus evolution of the pathome from complex to simple microbial community structures. By studying spatial scale, developed and underdeveloped neighborhoods, specific transmission pathways, and seasonality in this process, the conditions that lead to the greatest declines in enteric disease incidence can be identified. This virtual laboratory will be built upon extensive data collection in two different Kenyan cities, including household and neighborhood economic indicators, clinical, zoonotic, and environmental microbiology, behavioral observation, geotracking of humans and domestic animals, climate conditions, population density, and infant anthropometry. This initial virtual lab will provide an evidence-based tool for predicting effective urban interventions to control fecally-transmitted disease in cities globally undergoing epidemiological transitions in infectious disease.
ATHLETE will set up a prospective Europe-wide exposome cohort covering the first 2 decades of the life course, which will integrate data on the external, chemical, physical,behavioral, and social domains of the exposome, as well as on health outcomes and biological omics responses, from preconception until adolescence. As part of ATHLETE, the investigators will follow up a unique existing exposome cohort into adolescence (the HELIX Subcohort).
Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the leading cause s of health loss globally, representing a large proportion of general disability. Anxiety and depression occur in 20-30 percent of patients following MI and have been identified as risk factors for recurrent adverse cardiac event. The purpose of our this study is to develop and evaluate a disease specific cognitive behavioral therapy (C BT) protocol to reduce cardia anxiety, depression, increase physical inactivity and quality of life (Q oL) in patients following MI
This project proposes to systematically develop and evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a digitally delivered, graded exposure treatment for youth with chronic musculoskeletal pain, utilizing a sequential replicated and randomized single-case experimental design (SCED). SCED provides the opportunity to rigorously evaluate treatment effectiveness at the individual level. Development of iGET Living will be based on a series of short iterations, with alpha testing (Aim 1) on a small sample of adolescents with chronic pain (N = 15) and their parents (N = 15). For Aim 1, participants will participate in three, two hour focus groups (one per week over the course of three weeks), resulting in 6 total hours of participation per participant for Aim 1. Aim 2 will involve a sample (N = 20 youth, N = 20 parents) of naïve end-users. Participants will be enrolled in a baseline period ranging from 7-25 days (done to support SCED methodology) after which they will be enrolled in the online intervention program, lasting 6-weeks. Patients will be contacted 3-months post-discharge from treatment (week 22 of enrollment) and will complete self-report outcome measures at this time.
Main objective The intervention study IRECO aims to (1) modify habits of personal care product use for the participants and (2) evaluate the impact of those modification on urinary concentration for the following compounds: phthalates, phenols and glycol ether. Secondary objectives: The secondary objectives of this study aim to evaluate: 1. impact of modification of personal care product on the levels of biomarkers linked to exposure to environmental pollutant other than phthalates phenol and glycol ether (untargeted analysis) and biomarkers related to health (such as inflammatory biomarkers and oxidative stress). 2. hazard perception linked to the exposure to chemical product present in personal care product 3. barriers to change habits allowing to decrease exposure to environmental pollutant on short and long term as well as levers allowing to remove those barriers.
Although the vaccination is the preferred method of influenza prevention, there are some occasions on which a postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is required. Two neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) may be used in chemoprophylaxis in children: oral oseltamivir, and inhaled zanamivir. Both, oseltamivir and zanamivir, are effective in treatment and in prophylaxis of influenza, and the efficacy is calculated to reach 70-90%. Oseltamivir is used more frequently, since zanamivir is licensed in older children (5 years of age and above), and children under the age of 5 years are at higher risk of influenza complications. Oseltamivir use correlated in children with higher risk of vomiting, with no increased risk of other adverse events, including those observed in adult patients (nausea, renal events, and psychiatric effects). The PEP may be indicated by individual patient's characteristics (e.g. patients in high-risk group) or epidemiological reasons, i.e. prevention of institutional outbreaks.The one research that analyzed efficacy of 3-days PEP versus 7 or 10-days and showed overall efficacy of shorter oseltamivir prophylaxis to be high and comparable to that of longer regimens. The study included several pediatric patients and made the investigators perform such an analysis in pediatric population. In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators aimed to compare efficacy, safety, and costs of 3 versus 7-days prophylaxis with oral oseltamivir in children hospitalized. The hypothesis is that 3-days duration of PEP is not less effective than 7-days PEP, and patients might gain from lower number of adverse reactions related to drug administration.