View clinical trials related to Essential Hypertension.
Filter by:The main objective of the study will be to assess the efficacy and safety of Allisartan Isoproxil/Amlodipine (240 mg /5 mg) in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension uncontrolled after 4-week treatment with Amlodipine besylate（5 mg) or Allisartan Isoproxil (240 mg) .
The investigators are piloting a 3 month community-based lifestyle medicine program that incorporates experiences and education in urban agriculture, nutrition, culinary arts, and physical fitness to test the hypothesis whether this improves clinical and socio-behavioral outcomes of participants with Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic (CKM) syndrome (high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, heart disease, and obesity) in comparison to the current medical care model (usual care) or providing healthy produce (medically tailored groceries).
The purpose of this study is to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Co-administrated AD-2021 and AD-2022
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of co-administration of AD-227A and AD-227B in patients with essential hypertension
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study to evaluate efficacy and safety of HCP1803 compared to RLD2001-1 in patients with essential hypertension
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded crossover design. Nineteen patients with essential hypertension will be randomized to receive either ketone bodies (KE4) or placebo delivered by KetoneAid. After a period of 5-days treatment, effect variables will be measured (experiment day 1). After a washout period of 14 days, the subjects are crossed over to a similar treatment period with the other treatment. The study is terminated by measuring effect variables after the second treatment period (experiment day 2).
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center, Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the AJU-C52 compared with the combination of C52R1M in patients with essential Hypertension Patients who have inappropriately controlled on C52R1L treament
To compare between the effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and TENS on blood pressure and quality of life in patients with primary hypertension BACKGROUND: The current American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2017 guidelines define hypertension as systolic BP (SBP) of ≥130 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) of ≥80 mmHg. In adults, an increase of 20 mmHg in SBP or 10 mmHg in DBP is associated with more than a two-fold increase in mortality owing to stroke and other cardiovascular diseases. Hypertension accounts for 13% of premature deaths worldwide and is the third leading cause of disability-adjusted life years (Shah et al., 2022). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of the Neiguan (P6) point with acupressure is possibly affecting the blood pressure by protecting the myocardial tissues and influencing the nervous system through regulating the autonomic nervous system function and reduction in sympathetic activity. (Hassanein et al., 2021). HYPOTHESES There will be no a significant difference between the effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and TENS on blood pressure and quality of life in patients with primary hypertension RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there a significant difference between the effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and TENS on blood pressure and quality of life in patients with primary hypertension? Evaluating equipment, pre-post intervension outcomes: 1. BP by Digital Sphygmomanometer 2. quality of life by The SF-12 health status questionnaire 3. nitric oxide level in blood by nitric Oxide analysis. 4. sleep quality. by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) 5. exercise capacity and endurance by Thirty-Second Sit-To-Stand Test (30 STST)
The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial tested the hypothesis that for the same blood-pressure control, valsartan would reduce cardiac morbidity and mortality more than amlodipine in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk. The present study investigates effects of valsartan and amlodipine on pre-specified secondary kidney outcomes.
Based on the data of inpatients with hypertension and a cross-sectional study with a large sample size, this study aims to find the early warning value of the left anteroposterior atrial diameter for the possible occurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension, and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the above two methods for the early warning of the risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension, so as to achieve the purpose of early identification of high-risk groups that may develop atrial fibrillation.