View clinical trials related to Esophageal Neoplasms.
Filter by:Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is unsatisfactory in distinguishing between T1a and T1b stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Consequently, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend endoscopic resection (ER) as a diagnostic tool for substaging T1 stage ESCC. However, as an invasive approach, diagnostic ER is not an optimal approach especially for T1b cases as most of them might not be fully cured by ER. It is necessary to develop reliable and less invasive methods to distinguish between T1a and T1b stage ESCC. In our previous unicentral trial, we found that submucosal saline injection (SSI) significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of EUS in differentiating between T1a and T1b stage ESCC. It can be used as an alternative to diagnostic ER for preoperative substaging T1 stage ESCC cases in remote regions where few endoscopists are able to perform diagnostic ER. The use of EUS and SSI would help T1b stage patients avoid invasive diagnostic ER. Therefore, we aim to conduct a multi-center clinical trail to examine whether SSI can improve traditional EUS accuracy in distinguishing between T1a and T1b stage ESCC.
This study aims to assess the level of participation of thoracic cancer patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy and chemotherapy ± immunotherapy in their medical processes and the association between the level of participation and patients' side effects, quality of life, and long-term survival. Additionally, this study will rate the level of participation from both the patients' and medical staff's perspectives and will compare the differences in ratings from these two viewpoints, as well as their impact on treatment outcomes.
The study focused on patients with T2-4NxM0 resectable esophageal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant treatment involved administering anlotinib (10 mg orally, once a day, 2 weeks on and 1 week off) for anti-angiogenesis and sintilimab (200 mg) and chemotherapyfor three cycles. Surgical treatment was performed 4-6 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle was completed. The primary endpoints assessed were pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety.
Radical operation of esophageal cancer is complicated and traumatic, and ventilation with one lung in lateral position and ventilation with both lungs after supine position requires long-term tracheal intubation and ventilator-assisted ventilation, and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications is high.
Immunotherapy shows satisfactory effectiveness and safety in patients with esophageal cancer. Immunotherapy-based regimens have a better survival benefit compared to previous chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a reliable assessment of patients' functional status during treatment. However, the spectrum of symptoms in esophageal cancer patients receiving immunotherapy is uncertain, and there are no studies applying the symptom bank based on PRO to the immunotherapy model for esophageal cancer. In this prospective study, the investigators aimed to preliminarily screen for symptoms associated with immunotherapy for esophageal cancer through a systematic literature review and expert evaluation, and build a symptom item bank for esophageal cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. Adverse symptoms in esophageal cancer patients treated with immunotherapy were collected prospectively. The distribution and severity of the symptoms, as well as the trajectory of symptom change were further analyzed to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the symptom item bank. It would refine the spectrum of symptoms for esophageal cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and provide a foundation for assessing the specific symptom burden in patients with esophageal cancer receiving immunotherapy regimens.
This is a phase I clinical study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CAR-T in patients with CEA-positive advanced/metastatic solid tumors, and to obtain the maximum tolerated dose of CAR-T and phase II Recommended dose.
This trial aims to assess efficacy and safety of toripalimab combined with radiotherapy and S-1 followed by adjuvant toripalimab maintenance therapy for older patients with stage II-III esophageal cancer.
Objective: To investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of SI-B003 monotherapy and BL-B01D1+SI-B003 dual agents in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer and other gastrointestinal tumors, and to further explore the optimal dose and mode of combination.
The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of the combination of Anlotinib, Toripalimab, and albumin-bound paclitaxel with cisplatin for neoadjuvant therapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The study aims to improve the pathological complete response rate (pCR), R0 resection rate, and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery. The findings of this study will provide guidance and new options for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer patients.
Treatment of non-operable esophageal cancers is based on radiochemotherapy, or exclusive radiotherapy. The cardiac toxicity of radiotherapy in the treatment of thoracic tumor localizations is well documented, however, more and more studies are calling for the use of dosimetric parameters related to cardiac sub-structures to be integrated into clinical practice, rather than considering the heart as a whole. With this in mind, the aim of this study is to define the parameters, particularly dosimetric ones linked to cardiac sub-structures, influencing survival in patients treated with exclusive radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer.