View clinical trials related to Epilepsy.
Filter by:This is a prospective, unblinded sub-study to the E-30 to gather physiological data.
The studies described in this protocol are all performed within the framework of PROTECT (Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium) Workpackage 2 and Workgroup 1. Primary aim of these studies is to develop, test and disseminate methodological standards for the design, conduct and analysis of Pharmacoepidemiological (PE) studies applicable to different safety issues and using different data sources. To achieve this, results from PE studies on five key adverse events (AEs) performed in different databases will be evaluated. Therefore, emphasis will be on the methodological aspects of the studies in this protocol and not on the clinical consequences of the association under investigation. In the present project, investigators use Columbia Classification Algorithm of suicide assessment (C-CASA) definitions as a basis to specify the operational definitions of the different aspects of suicidality. The focus of the main analyses is on attempted suicide including completed suicide. This is due to statistical power issues. However, investigators will apply two additional outcome definitions in sensitivity analyses: 1) completed suicide only and 2) completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation plus indeterminate or potentially suicidal events. Investigators will not include terms which clearly indicate an accidental event, or self-injurious behavior without a suicidal intent. These definitions are listed in the statistical analysis plan together with lists of terms from the dictionaries used in the different databases. The objectives of this study are to 1) Compare the study results which are based on two data sources (he UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) and Danish registries) and different designs and evaluate the impact of design and population differences on the outcome of the study results (the UK database 'The Health Improvement Network' (THIN) may be included in these analyses as well); 2) Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the two data sources to study a possible association of antiepileptic drug (AED) use and suicidality, in particular the specific outcomes of death from suicide, hospitalization due to suicide attempt, and reports of the aspects of suicidality by the patients; 3) Estimate risks of completed suicide, completed suicide and attempted suicide, and completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation plus indeterminate or potentially suicidal events overall for all AEDs and by individual AEDs prescribed in UK and Denmark; and 4) Describe the patterns of AED prescribing in six European databases (GPRD and THIN, UK; Danish registries; Mondriaan, Netherlands; Bavaria, Germany; Base de Datos para la Investigación Farmacoepidemiologica en Atencion Primaria (BIFAP), Spain).
There are a number of anti-epileptic drugs available for the treatment of partial onset seizures in patients with epilepsy. This study is a systematic review of the published literature on anti-epileptic drugs and is designed to compare the relative effectiveness and tolerability of a selection of them with retigabine. The drugs chosen for this comparison were lacosamide, pregabalin, tiagabine, zonisamide and eslicarbazepine. They were chosen because they belong to the newer generation of drugs for epilepsy (as does retigabine) and they have a similar license as well as having published data from studies that were conducted in similar patient populations with similar methods. GSK commissioned YHEC (York Health Economic Consortium) to carry out this review and analysis. YHEC identified relevant studies from international databases. These studies had compared one of the chosen anti-epileptic drugs with placebo. The results were pooled and combined in order to summarize the data for individual drugs as well to compare the results for different drugs with each other and with retigabine. Since none of the individual clinical studies compared one active drug with another, this systematic review is an indirect comparison of these drugs, using an established and recognised methodology which has well understood limitations.
An interaction study to assess the effect of the ezogabine/retigabine and the main metabolite NAMR on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy volunteers
The purpose of this prospective, clinical observational trial is to assess the incidence of pain (and analgesia), methods of pain assessment (and by whom), prescribed analgesics, methods of analgesic delivery, and patient/parent satisfaction in patients undergoing craniotomy surgery at three major children's hospitals (Boston Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The Children's Center Johns Hopkins Hospital) in the United States.
There is an urgent need to understand the psychological and situational factors that influence medication adherence in individuals with epilepsy. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC, 2010) about 2.5 million people in the United States have epilepsy and one third of them still have seizures despite receiving treatment. With proper medication, an estimated 60-70% of individuals with new onset epilepsy become, and remain, seizure free (Kwan & Brodie, 2000). Despite the success of medical treatment of epilepsy, many patients do not receive these benefits due to inadequate adherence to medication (Meyer et al., 2010). And, as with other chronic medical conditions, estimates suggest that between 30% and 60% of patients with epilepsy are not adherent with their drug regimens (Green & Simons Morton, 1988; Leppik, 1990; Jones et al., 2006). Poor adherence may be the most important cause of poorly controlled epilepsy (Gomes et al., 1998). Stanaway et al. (1985) found that 31% of seizures were precipitated by nonadherence to medication. Questions regarding adherence are theoretically informed by Fisher et al. (2006)'s Information Motivation Behavioral Skills (IMB) model. While originally developed to describe, predict, and inform interventions for antiretroviral treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), this study applies the model to epilepsy for the first time. In addition, this study intends to produce an accurate description of how individuals with epilepsy manage their medication adherence by identifying current self regulation strategies (immediate adherence behaviors, preparatory behaviors, and barrier management strategies) and their situational determinants. Situational determinants can explain some of the fluctuations in medication adherence. Patients who are motivated to take their medications might still show inconsistent medication adherence. For example, patients might miss good opportunities to take their medication or fail to anticipate unexpected barriers such as a spontaneous dinner with friends or a bout of depression. Therefore, the study will take particular care to investigate situational cues such as good opportunities for adherence (e.g., taking medication with regular meals or before brushing teeth) and expected and unexpected barriers. Preparatory behaviors and their cues are also of interest in this study: Some patients use facilitators (such as physical or electronic reminder systems, electronic pill bottles and pill boxes) to ensure adequate medication adherence. Social support can serve a similar function of reminding patients to take their medication. To address these questions, the investigators plan to explore how individual regulation and social support influence medication adherence in patients with epilepsy. The specific aims of the proposed research are: 1. To test the hypothesis that there will be a main effect of information, motivation and behavioral skills, on adherence behavior, and that a mediation model will show that information and motivation effects are partially mediated through behavioral skills. 2. To identify self regulation strategies and their situational cues (good opportunities, facilitators, and barriers) for medication adherence among individuals with epilepsy to better describe best practices and challenges.
Epilepsy affects 0.7% of the general population and 15-20% of patients develop drug resistance. The temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common symptomatic focal epilepsies with a particularly high rate of drug (about 20 to 30%). In this type of epilepsy, where feasible, surgical removal of the home is the best therapeutic outcome. Mechanisms of epileptogenesis and drug resistance are still mysterious. Of recent clinical and experimental studies have shown that dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) contributes to epileptogenesis and drug resistance. It is now recognized that cytokines exacerbate the excitability and permeability of the BBB, which was recently confirmed by studies showing that treatment of inflammation reduces epileptogenesis. Moreover, we have described an association between pathological angiogenesis and BBB permeability in the tissue of patients with excision of drug-resistant TLE. With experimental models, it was revealed an activation of the VEGF-VEGFR2 by seizures leading to rapid degradation of the BBB. The investigators hypothesis is that the identification of factors involved in BBB permeability may designate potential targets for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.
Epilepsy is common in childhood. Children with epilepsy are at increased risk of impaired health, functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life. There is compelling evidence that physical activity improves the medical and psychosocial aspects of health in adults with epilepsy - but there are no such studies in children. This study is to see if increased levels of physical activity can influence children's functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life.
This is a multicenter, non-interventional, prospective study. The observation period comprises at least 6 months, from the initiation of ESL add-on therapy in adult patients with partial-onset epilepsy not sufficiently controlled with one AED, until the first visit that occurs between 6 and 9 months of follow-up. The observation period will end after 9 months of follow-up even if the final assessment is not performed.
The purpose of this observational registry is to evaluate the long-term effectiveness, safety and performance of market-released Medtronic Neuromodulation products for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. In addition, healthcare resource use and patient reported outcomes, such as health related quality of life will be assessed.