View clinical trials related to Endoscopy.
Filter by:The aim of the study is retrospectively evaluating all features of endoscopic and pathological diagnoses of cases who underwent upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.
The purpose of this study is to compare an Enhanced Recovery Pathway to the current pre-operative/recovery practices of the endoscopy department on patient post-procedure outcomes.
In this study, the investigators proposed an artificial intelligence-based biliary stricture navigation system in MRCP-based ERCP, which can instruct the direction of guide wire and the position of stent placement in real time.
This study aims to test the hypothesis that the diagnosis for histological type, histological grade, LAUREN type, HER-2 expression, MSI/dMMR status, and EBV status in gastric cancer is at least as reliable when performed on endoscopic biopsy specimens as on surgical resection specimens.
This is a noninferiority study designed to examine whether conscious sedation with midazolam alone results in efficacy and safety that is not inferior to the combination of midazolam and fentanyl. English-speaking patients ≥18 years old and ≤75 years old presenting for GI endoscopy planned with conscious sedation using midazolam and fentanyl, will be randomized 1:1 to single agent sedation with midazolam or combination sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Participants will be blinded to the choice of sedation. Sedation quality and adverse events will be measured with a validated patient-centered measure of procedural sedation quality, the PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) [Leffler, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):194-203]. Endoscopic quality measures in the 2 study groups will be collected by retrospective chart review, as an additional metric to ensure the quality of the procedure is not compromised by the choice of sedation.
Patients who received the indication for endoscopic diagnostics using gastroscopy in transnasal technique will be included into the study. The examination is carried out in standard technique and is not influenced by the study. Following the examination, patient data is collected pseudonymously and a questionnaire is submitted to the patient.
In this study, the investigators proposed a prospective study about the effectiveness of artificial intelligence system for Retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The subjects would be include in an analyses groups. The AI-assisted system helps endoscopic physicians estimate the difficulty of Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis and make recommendations based on guidelines and difficulty scores. The investigators used the stone removal times, success rate of stone extraction and Operating time to reflect the difficulty of the operation, and evaluated whether the results of the AI system were correct.
Team work is highly challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic. Necessary protective equipment as FFP-mask and face shields impair communication significantly.Objective of the study is to evalaute the impact of digital enhanced telecommunication in endoscopic procedures.
The main purpose of this trial is to evaluate two devices used in the treatment of Zenker Diverticulum using flexible endoscopy (LigaSure and SB-knife). Analyze the technical success, clinical success, relapses, complications, and the mean procedure time with each device prospectively in order to transfer objective and uniform results to routine clinical practice.
During the course of an endoscopic procedure, air has historically been used to inflate the lumen to provide adequate visualization and allow for the endoscope to advance as necessary. In many adult centers, carbon dioxide is used for insufflation for all procedures. Many pediatric centers have started using carbon dioxide for insufflation during endoscopy based on the adult studies. Few pediatric studies have been done. This study is designed to test whether carbon dioxide is associated with any negative, post-procedural, outcomes in pediatric patients.