Clinical Trials Logo

Emergencies clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Emergencies.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02408692 Completed - Contraception Clinical Trials

Emergency Contraception and Body Weight: Pilot Study

Start date: February 2015
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this research study is to determine how body weight changes the drug level of an emergency contraceptive pill containing a hormone called levonorgestrel (LNG). This emergency contraceptive is available to women without a prescription, but has recently been found to not work as well to prevent pregnancies in women of higher body weight. The overall goal of this research is to improve the effectiveness of contraception for women, no matter their weight.

NCT ID: NCT02404610 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Moderate Versus Deep Procedural Sedation With Propofol in the Emergency Department

Start date: July 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study is a clinical trial of moderate sedation versus deep sedation with propofol for procedural sedation in the Emergency Department. The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of amnesia and respiratory depression rate in patients who receive moderate sedation to those that receive deep sedation.

NCT ID: NCT02386657 Completed - Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Trials

Single-center Prospective Evaluation of Sickle Cell Patient Care in the CHU Brugmann Emergency Department

Start date: November 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Sickle Cell Disease is a serious disease that is life-threatening for patients being homozygous for the SS form or heterozygous for the SC or bthal forms. The CHU Brugmann hospital currently regularly treats about 70 homozygous adult patients and this number is in constant augmentation. The age average of the patients is below 30. The hospital developed a close collaboration with the Queen Fabiola Kids University Hospital to optimize the transition of young sickle cell patients from the pediatric to the adult network. The emergency care of sickle cell patients remains a source of worry. Even with a correct treatment (Hydroxy-urea or exsanguineous transfusions), patients suffer from frequent sickle cell disease crisis when stress or infection cause hemolysis. The pain level is intolerable and causes emergency hospital admission (2 to 3 crisis per patient per year on average). The crisis are more frequent with poor compliance to the treatments. There are several obstacles to the rapid and optimal management of these patients: - fear of causing addiction to heavy pain releaf products (high dosis of morphine) - lack of biological parameters for the determination of the crisis severity. The prognostic value of the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level in a vaso-occlusive crisis was recently stressed while activation of the coagulation, translated by the elevation of various parameters including the rate of DD dimers, seemed associated with clinical complications. The deleterious role of increased oxidative stress has also been recently demonstrated in patients with sickle cell disease, opening new therapeutic avenues. This study aims to prospectively evaluate the management of sickle cell patients being admitted in the emergency department for a vaso-occlusive crisis. The level of satisfaction of the patients will be measured. The investigators will also evaluate the predictive value of several routine biological parameters regarding the severity of the crisis, including the values of nitrous albumin (PNA) as marker of oxydative stress. This last dosage will be made in collaboration with the team of Dr Wayenberg and Pr Bottari in Grenoble.

NCT ID: NCT02377687 Completed - Surgery Clinical Trials

Is Life Worth Living After Major Emergency GI Surgery? Patient Reported Outcome in Elderly Emergency Surgery Patients

Start date: November 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

To study the impact of emergency high risk GI surgery on HRQOL in elderly patients, seventy-five years or above and to explore the patients' experience with the informed consent process and the status 6 months after surgery.

NCT ID: NCT02375919 Completed - Emergency Patients Clinical Trials

PERC Rule to Exclude Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Deparment

PROPER
Start date: August 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out Criteria (PERC) is an 8-item rule, that was derived and tested to rule out the diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism (PE) in the Emergency Department (ED) amongst low risk patients. Even though meta analyses have confirmed the safety of its utilization, equipoise remains - especially in European country where the prevalence of PE is higher than in the US- on whether this rule could be safely applied to all low risk emergency patients with a suspicion of PE. The PROPER Trial is a non inferiority , cluster randomized trial. All centers will recruit patients with a suspicion of PE and a low pre test probability. To rule out the diagnosis of PE, center will use the usual diagnostic strategies with D-dimeres measurement for 6 months, and PERC based strategy for 6 months. In the control group (usual strategy), patients will be tested for D-dimeres, followed if positive by a Computed Tomography of Pulmonary Artery (CTPA). In the intervention group (PERC Based), patients will be first assessed with PERC score. If PERC=0, then the diagnosis of PE will be exclude with no supplemental investigations. If PERC>0, then patients will undergo the usual strategy, with D-dimeres measurement +/- CTPA. The primary outcome is the failure percentage of the diagnostic strategy, defined as diagnosed deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or PE at 3 month follow up, among patients for whom PE has been initially ruled out.

NCT ID: NCT02358655 Completed - Stroke Clinical Trials

Canadian Community Utilization of Stroke Prevention Study - Emergency Department

C-CUSP ED
Start date: June 1, 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart condition, and increases the risk of stroke by six times. There are several medications (blood thinners) that can prevent strokes in AF patients. Many AF patients present to the emergency department, but about half of AF patients leave without prescription of a blood thinner. The study aims to evaluate if adding options like giving a patient education kit, encouraging emergency room physicians to prescribe a blood thinner and providing a specialized AF clinic to patients will increase the number patients receiving blood thinners to prevent strokes.

NCT ID: NCT02356926 Completed - Emergency Patients Clinical Trials

Cross Checking to Reduce Adverse Events in the Emergency Department

Charmed
Start date: February 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Multicenter cluster randomized study to evaluate the reduction of the rate of severe medical errors with implementation of systematic cross checkings between emergency physician.

NCT ID: NCT02353793 Completed - Trauma Clinical Trials

Trauma Patients and Hypothermia in the Emergency Room: ReadyHeat® Versus Cotton Wool Blanket

Start date: April 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hypothermia is a common problem in traumatized patients leading to severe complications such as impaired coagulation, increased rate of wound infections and overall patient discomfort among others. Therefore, the investigators test out the new self warming ReadyHeat® blanket device against the currently used cotton wool blanket in terms of effects on the prevention and treatment of hypothermia.

NCT ID: NCT02342171 Completed - Clinical trials for Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola

Emergency Evaluation of Convalescent Plasma for Ebola Viral Disease (EVD) in Guinea

Ebola-Tx
Start date: February 2015
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This is an emergency, phase 2/3, open-label, non-randomized, clinical trial that will evaluate Convalescent Plasma (CP) added to standardized supportive care (SC) in patients with confirmed Ebola Virus Disease (EVD). No patient will be refused CP when compatible products are available and all efforts will be made to maximize CP availability during the study. EVD patients recruited during the period before CP becomes available or for whom no compatible CP is available will be given SC and will be followed for study outcomes. Data from these SC patients will be the used as comparator in the analysis of the study. The primary objective of the study is to assess if CP + SC improves the 14 day survival of patients, compared to SC alone. The Investigators aim to enroll a total number of 130 - 200 patients who will be treated treated with CP assuming equal numbers of patients treated with SC alone. If there would be insufficient patients treated with SC, patients treated at the research site prior to study start may be included in the comparison group. Patients will be recruited in the Ebola Treatment centre managed by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) in Conakry, Guinea. All patients and/or relatives presenting at the centre will be informed about the study, and will be invited to provide consent at the time of admission inside the treatment centre. Only patients for whom ebola infection is confirmed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) will be enrolled in the study. After inclusion, eligibility to the intervention will be reassessed on regular intervals. If the eligibility criteria are not met by 48 hours after inclusion, only SC will be continued. In line with the guidance of the World Health Organization (WHO), two units of CP will be given. EVD patients will be transfused with ABO-compatible CP using standard procedures. Details on the modalities of transfusion can be found in the WHO guidance document and the MSF guidelines on blood transfusion. All patients will be under close observation for transfusion-related adverse reactions during and up to 4 hours after transfusion. 24 hours after the start of transfusion, a blood sample will be collected for viral load assessment. All other aspects of patient management will be according to MSF clinical guidelines. The decision to discharge a patient should be taken on clinical grounds, but can be supported by the laboratory results. After discharge, the patient will be followed up by the study team until day 30.

NCT ID: NCT02326623 Completed - Clinical trials for Children Requiring IV Placement

Distraction to Reduce Pain and Distress in the Pediatric Emergency Department

Start date: October 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Many medical procedures aimed at helping children can cause them pain and distress. If children have certain levels of pain or distress, it can have long lasting negative effects. The emergency department can be a very stressful place for children and their parents. There are also many procedures that children may have in the emergency department that can cause pain and distress. These include procedures such as needle pokes, stitches, or setting a broken bone. Two common methods of managing a child's pain in the emergency department are drugs and distraction. Drugs are not always practical and may come with unwanted side effects. Distraction is often used by parents or health professionals to help children deal with pain and stress. Distraction can lower the child's pain and distress by moving their attention from the painful experience, for example a needle poke, to a more positive feeling such as watching a movie, playing a game, or listening to music. This study will test if iPads are useful to help lower pain and distress for children (ages 6 to 11 years) who are visiting an emergency department and need an intravenous line put in. The results from this study could be important for many children receiving medical care, as distraction is safe and the use of iPads is enjoyable for many children.