View clinical trials related to Emergencies.
Filter by:Risk stratification of COVID-19 patients is essential to define their appropriate treatment setting. So far, available studies have focused on morbidity and mortality prediction in patients admitted to hospital. In the Emergency Department (ED), decision on home discharge versus hospital admission for COVID-19 is cumbersome. While facing a dramatic second wave of SARS-CoV-2, shortage of hospital beds has further increased the challenge. The present study will prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients discharged from the ED. Stratification will be based on a composite of demographic, clinical and lung imaging variables. Results will be used to develop standardized decision rules for safe home discharge of patients with COVID-19 evaluated in the ED.
The investigators are evaluating if the use of humanoid robots is an optimal distraction strategy in order to produce positive emotional states and facilitate the diagnosis and to reduce treatment time in pediatric age in emergency situations.
The main objective for investigators is to determine the prevalence of moderate to severe chronic pain in the adult population 6 months after consultation in the emergency department for acute pain (less than 7 days old) and severe pain assessed at admission and defined as greater than or equal to 6/10 by the numerical pain scale.
The purpose of this study is to reduce medical error by omitting management steps in medical crises. The Interventions will be: training in non-technical skills and checklists versus Control: standard training with checklists
With the help of medical progress, life expectancy has increased in our country, resulting in an increase in the number of elderly people and especially so-called complex patients. These complex elderly patients present with a combination of poly pathology, locomotor disorders and loss of autonomy, which leads to increased risks of hospitalization, re-hospitalization or difficulty in remaining at home. These risks could be reduced by early adapted care specific to this type of patient. To do this, it is necessary to identify these complex elderly patients as early as possible in their care pathway. Screening complex elderly patients in the emergency department would require trained and educated staff, or the use of a simple, rapid and reliable diagnostic scale. The purpose of this study is to compare two scales for the screening of complex elderly patients, whose use is adapted to the Hospital Emergency Department environment. This study assess the diagnostic performance of the ISAR and SoCoLoc scales for complex elderly patients.
Patients commonly visit the emergency department (ED) for pain after musculoskeletal injury and need early treatment with analgesic. Prompt and adequate pain relief can reduce suffering and promote early discharge and return to work. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are the major injectable analgesic used for moderate to severe pain in EDs in Hong Kong. They are given via intravenous or intramuscular route for faster onset of action to achieve rapid pain relief in the emergency setting. However, injections are invasive and can be distressing for patients. Methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) is recently introduced to our emergency department as an inhalational analgesic. It has been granted registration approval in Hong Kong since 2018, but it is not widely used in the locality. Methoxyflurane is a volatile fluorinated hydrocarbon self-administrated by inhalation through a portable hand-held whistle-shaped inhaler device (Penthrox®) to relieve pain associated with trauma or minor surgical procedures in stable and conscious patients. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy and safety Penthrox® in the treatment of acute traumatic pain in hospital emergency department setting by comparing it to another conventional analgesic commonly used.
The study objective was to identify predictive criteria of severe non-traumatic secondary headache among the information gathered during telephone interview conducted by the on-call regulating physician at the Centre15.
Introduction: In modern surgery, the prediction of perioperative death gains significant importance due to the availability of treatment options, means of improving the surgical outcome and for proper patient information. However, patient heterogeneity and the existence of multiple risk prediction tools complicate the prediction of perioperative mortality. Thus, prognostic tools are developed based on the analysis of preoperative variables. Most commonly used models are POSSUM, ACS-NSQIP, NELA and POTTER. The models have been assessed in West-European and North-American populations, each with different prognostic value. Aim: Comparative analysis of predictive accuracy of the aforementioned risk prediction tools in Greek population. Materials and Methods: The study is multicenter, non-interventional, prospective and observational and includes patients undergoing emergency laparotomies of general surgery. In cases of multiple operations in one hospitalization, the first operation is included. The clinical-laboratory variables, derived from POSSUM, NELA, ACS-NSQIP and POTTER models are recorded anonymously in a secure online database, REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture).The minimum estimated number of included patients in order to accomplish statistically significant results is 600. Each of the centers submitted in the study, is expected to include approximately 60 patients in a period of 6-12 months. For the statistical analysis of data, Brier Score will be used and ROC with statistical significance lower than 0.05. Conclusions: Upon completion of this study, the most accurate perioperative risk prediction tool in the Greek population is expected to be proposed.
One of the most common presentations to ED is chest pain, with the rapid rule out of heart attacks in the emergency department being common place. This moves a new onus of responsibility to the EDÍž the care of long term heart disease. A study conducted locally demonstrated that patient's with a heart attack ruled out felt the 'what next' question is not answered sufficiently at present. The strength of this opportunity is re-enforced by studies suggesting that chest pain presents a teachable moment where patients are more accepting of advice. The study's overarching goal is to improve heart disease care (cardiovascular disease).The early warning signs for heart disease can be detected and treated enabling patients to live longer and healthier lives. This is where it is believed that the Emergency Department (ED) can improve, EDs already collect the vast majority of data required to detect these early warning signs. In the United Kingdom more than 23.8 million attendances were registered last year, and ED is currently underusing a large amount of patient data of potentially great value to the population. The study aims to explore the best way to use this long term heart disease predictionÍž how to communicate it to patients, who prescribes the necessary medication, who issues lifestyle advice, and who follows it up. The investigators intend to answer these questions with a series of semi-structured interviews. The study will comprise of initial semistructured interviews made up of emergency medicine consultants, general practitioners, nurses, and patients. Then building on the knowledge gained from the initial interviews it is planned to build a prototype care pathway that will be explored in the second set of interviews. Funded by The Royal College of Emergency Medicine Ethical approval by the UK's HRA REC - 19/WA/0312
Since 2000, various emerging infectious diseases have repeatedly caused serious impact on the health of the global population and the healthcare systems. With the growing international transportation and improving accessibility of the healthcare systems, hospitals have been inevitably the first sentinels dealing with emerging infectious diseases. The biological disasters, such as the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak in South Korean in 2015, and the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak this year, challenged our vulnerable healthcare systems and caused great loss of lives. Regarding the ongoing global epidemics and possible community outbreaks of the COVID-19, the management of biological disasters for an overcrowded emergency department should be planned. In the early 2020, the emergency department used a double-triage and telemedicine method to treat non-critical patient with suspected COVID-19. This application reduced the exposure time of the first responders and reserve adequate interview quality. However, for the critical patients treated in the isolated resuscitation rooms, the unique environment limited the teamwork and communication for the resuscitation team. These factors might led to poorer quality of critical care. The investigators designed a telemedicine-teamwork model, which connected the isolation room, prepare room and nursing station by an video-conferencing system in the emergency department. This model try to break the barriers of space between the rooms and facilitate the teamwork communications between each unit. Besides, by providing a more efficient workflow, this model could lower the total exposure time for all workers in the contaminated area. This study was conducted to evaluate the benefits of the telemedicine-teamwork model and provide a practical, safe and effective alternative to critical care of the patients with suspected highly infectious diseases.