Clinical Trials Logo

Elderly Patient clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Elderly Patient.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05878782 Not yet recruiting - Cancer Clinical Trials

the Impact of Occupational Therapy : a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

OCEAN-OT
Start date: September 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this randomized controlled superiority trial is to evaluate the impact of occupational therapy assessment and intervention on the quality of life of elderly cancer patients. Patients will be randomized into 3 parallel, multicenter arms with patient-reported outcome and blinded evaluator. - Experimental group A will combine the assessment of occupational problems (MCRO) and an occupational therapy intervention. - Experimental group B will have only the MCRO assessment because the occupational problems assessment alone (without intervention) could improve quality of life and occupational performance outcomes, according to the Nielsen, 2019 study - Group C will have the usual cancer management care combining specific treatments and supportive care.

NCT ID: NCT04426136 Not yet recruiting - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Disparity in Surgical Procedure (Wide Local Excision Only vs Any Other Surgery Procedures) Among the Elderly Breast Cancer Patients

Start date: June 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer are still increasing in both developing and developed countries. The number of women ≥70 years who are affected by breast cancer (BC) worldwide is also on the increase. Based on the largest population and increasing aging, BC is also rapidly increasing among the elderly in China. According to the epidemiological profile data regarding BC in China, the second onset age peak of BC morbidity occurred after 70 years old and in 2020, the proportion of patients older than 65 is expected to exceed one-fifth and reach 27.0% by 2030. However, some controversies remain to be resolved due to the lack of high quality evidence. The tumor biological behavior, treatment choice and treatment tolerance among the elderly prominently differ from their young counterparts. Besides, they are rarely enrolled in large-scale randomized clinical trials or prospective cohort studies and the results are obtained mainly from retrospective studies. Also, frequent deviations from the standard guidelines lead to insufficient or excessive treatments, though the so-called standard guidelines are based on the clinicopathological characteristics and research findings among the younger BC patients. Studies focusing on the global population confirmed that the biological behavior of tumors among elderly patients was more favorable compared with younger patients but did not transform into survival benefits eventually. Numerous prospective, randomized trials have demonstrated that breast conserving surgery (BCS), consisting of segmental mastectomy and radiation treatment with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), is equivalent to mastectomy in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) for patients with early stage breast carcinoma. Presentation of the ACOZOG-Z011 study results in 2011 resulted in a downward trend in the use of a completion axillary lymph node dissection in early breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN), treated with wide local excision (WLE) and whole breast irradiation. However, there is little evidence regarding the optimal axillary treatment in elderly breast cancer patients, since these patients are often excluded from clinical trials. We had done a retrospective study of breast cancer in the elderly, which demonstrated that those who with complex comorbidities receiving wide local excision merely were about 1.5 times more than those who without (71.2% vs 46.0%, p<0.001). However, it is paradoxical that, on the one hand, the risk of dying from breast cancer may increase if patients do not receive the standard treatment; on the other hand, they could not live long enough to benefit or even suffer more from the standard treatment. The key is to figure out who they are. Given the high proportion of patients treated only with WLE, we believe that it is important to compare the effects of different surgical procedures on prognosis among the elderly BC patient in a prospective cohort study, to be more specific, comparing the WLE versus any other surgical procedures.