View clinical trials related to Efficacy.
Filter by:1. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levosimendan in the treatment of heart failure ; 2. Guide patients to apply levosimendan individually and establish a dose adjustment program.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy expressed in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices, the clinical response and the risk of adverse reactions following the continuous and intermittent administration of linezolid in critical patients in the Intensive Care Unit. Subject inclusion criteria: A minimum of 30 subjects in each group will be included in the study, in accordance with the study inclusion criteria: - patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit, - female or male sex, - age over 18 years, - linezolid is prescribed by the attending physician, in empirical or targeted treatment Exclusion criteria: Patients who have documented severe liver failure (Child-Pugh C score). Patients who refuse to sign the informed consent
A Prospective Registry to assess the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach
The goal of this observational study aims to observe and evaluate the efficacy and safety of a liposomal doxorubicin containing regimen in the postoperative adjuvant treatment of breast cancer patients.
The purpose of this study is to describe safety and efficacy of Dapaglifozin in adults patients with a systemic right ventricle (congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries or transposition of the great arteries following arterial switch procedure) and impaired systolic function of the systemic right ventricle.
This is a multi-center, non-randomized, open label study. Subjects will be enrolled if they are deemed eligible given the inclusion criteria. Subjects who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be entered into the study. Subjects will be exposed to non-radioactive 13C-Urea with citric acid, and may submit a stool sample or undergo endoscopy for Rapid Urease Test and Histology samples. Center(s) will house a PyloPlus UBT Analyzer to document results. PyloPlus Analyzer results shall remain blinded to the investigator and treating physician. No patient management decisions should be made based on the investigational PyloPlus UBT System. Treating physician will either prescribe a H. pylori Stool Antigen Test through P4 Diagnostics, along with another Urea Breath Test using Breath ID, or patient will undergo Endoscopy to provide a composite reference method consisting of Rapid Urease Test and Histology. These will act as the comparators to the PyloPlus Urea Breath Test System.
Primary：Objectives ：SafetyTo describe the safetyprofile of all participants in each group up to 6months post-dose.Immunogenicity：To demonstrate the superiorityof neutralizing antibodyresponse in terms of geometric mean titers (GMT) of mRNA vaccine compare with inactive vaccine28 days post dose. Secondary:Immunogenicity 1. To describe binding antibodyprofile at D01,D08, D15, D29,D91 and D181 of eachstudy group. 2. To describe the neutralizing antibody profile atD08,D15,D91 and D181of 600 participants for each studyintervention group. Exploratory:Cell-mediated immunity To describe the cellular immuneresponse profile at D01, D08, D15and D29, in a subset of 30 participants for each study group. Efficacy:To describe the occurrence of virologically-confirmed COVID-19 like illness and serologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Open-label, prospective, observational, single arm, multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Ertugliflozin and Sitagliptin Con-initiation in patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus in the Pakistani population. The study duration will be 12 months.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as an effective and safe treatment for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer(PCa). However, there is no study that has investigated the effectiveness and safety of SBRT with pelvic radiation and gross target volume(GTV) boost for high-risk prostate cancer patients yet. The investigators designed a phase II clinical study of SBRT with pelvic radiation and GTV boost based on mpMRI in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
20-60 participants are expected to be enrolled for the Phase I clinical trial which is further divided into two parts: a "3+3" dose escalation study and an expanded enrollment study. The Phase I clinical trial is expected to be finished in 36 months. To be specific, the dose escalation study plans to include patients with advanced malignant solid tumors with clear pathological diagnosis, including melanoma, cervical cancer, head and neck squamous cell tumors, non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer, etc.; while the expanded enrollment study plans to include those with melanoma, cervical cancer, and head and neck squamous cell tumors.