View clinical trials related to Edema.
Filter by:Purpose of the study：This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of serum SUR1, TRPM4 and MMP-9 in the diagnosis of cerebral edema in children with cerebral edema admitted to PICU by comparing them with CT results and perturbation coefficients, so as to provide biological indicators for clinical diagnosis of cerebral edema and provide targets for the treatment of cerebral edema in various diseases.
The investigators's aim is to examine trunk and upper extremity edema after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and/or labrum repair surgeries. During surgery, the shoulder joint capsule is cut and the joint is entered arthroscopically. During this procedure, approximately 3-6 liters of saline fluid is injected into the joint, depending on the duration of the surgery. The given fluid accumulates out of the joint in relation to the duration of the surgery and the amount of fluid given. In this study, the investigators aim is to examine how much the extra-articular fluid collects under the skin of the upper extremity and trunk, and the change in the amount of fluid 24 hours after surgery. Examination of the amount of subcutaneous fluid may help to better understand the postoperative complications such as edema, carpal tunnel syndrome, compartment syndrome, myolysis, and dyspnea. How much edema the joint and surrounding structures are exposed to and its relationship with the duration of surgery can help to clinicians determine the safe discharge time.
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of foselutoclax (UBX1325) in patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. The main questions the study aims to answer are: - Assess the efficacy of foselutoclax compared to aflibercept - Assess the safety and tolerability of foselutoclax
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of exercise and classical massage in the control of knee edema in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Explore the role of Inflammation and coagulation factors in cerebrospinal fluid for predicting persistent cerebral edema after subarachnoid hemorrhage
This is an exploratory interventional study. The aim of the investigation is to identify and quantify contributing factors to local bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measured by a wearable sensor patch, particularly the effect of fluid shifts caused by postural changes and lower body negative pressure (LBNP).
Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) or uveitis-related macular edema who have failed first-line therapy such as anti-VEGF, laser treatments, or dexamethasone implants (DXM) are candidates for treatment with an intravitreal injection of a fluocinolone acetonide (AcF) implant. AcF is unique in that it delivers intravitreal corticosteroids for 2 to 3 years, whereas DXM only releases them for 3 to 6 months. After 6 months for AcF and 1 month for DXM, full therapeutic efficacy is attained. AcF's safety and efficacy have now been confirmed in the FAME originator studies as well as other phase IV investigations. However, in the FAME princeps trials and numerous phase IV trials where patients got AcF more than 6 months after DXM, up to 40% of patients required laser, anti-VEGF, and/or DXM retreatment within the AcF active period. This high rate could be attributed to AcF's 6-month delay in reaching full efficacy. This is why the investigators intended to replicate the previous Iluvi1-month research, which shown that injecting DXM at 1 month preserved visual acuity and central retinal thickness for the first 6 months without increasing intraocular pressure significantly. The study, however, was unable to determine the long-term impact on the rate of relapses requiring additional therapy as well as tolerance with the development of long-term cortisone-induced glaucoma. In light of this, the investigators should like to gather new data for a 3-year follow-up after AcF injection, including measurements of optic nerve fibre thickness (OCT RNFL). This is an essential safety data point because it assesses the long-term effects of ocular hypertension, which is a well-known side effect of intravitreal corticosteroids.
The study's primary aim is - to compare the effects of two different ventilation modalities, non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) and high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC), in the acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) setting, in terms of echocardiographic parameters of RV systolic and RV strain. - to determine the differences of the two interventions on other hemodynamic parameters echocardiographically assessed. - to assess the differences between the two interventions on physiological parameters, i.e., mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and on arterial blood gases (ABG) analysis parameters (i.e. relief of dyspnea and respiratory distress, patient comfort). Enrolled patients will receive NPPV and HFNC oxygen therapy in a randomized, cross-over fashion, for 40 minutes each (time 0, T0 and time 1, T1), followed by clinical and echocardiographic evaluation
The dexamethasone 700 μg intravitreal implant (DEX-I) delivers dexamethasone gradually to the retina over time. It is an approved drug for the treatment of DME. This study will assess adult participants with diabetic macular edema (DME) and suboptimal response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy that are treated with DEX-I in the routine clinical setting. Approximately 327 participants who are prescribed DEX-I by their physicians will be enrolled at approximately 40 sites in approximately 10 countries globally. Participants will be followed for 18 months post-DEX-I implantation according to the routine clinical practice of the prescribing centers. Only one eye per participant will be evaluated in the study. No additional burden for participants in this trial is expected.
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether subthreshold treatment with micropulsed laser can be effective in resolving macular edema in patients with inherited retinal dystrophy. Visits will be performed after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment. Laser treatment will be performed on the day of the first visit, and its repetition at subsequent visits between months 3 and 12 will be evaluated. Evaluations of treatment effects will include: - comprehensive ophthalmologic examination - multifocal electroretinogram - OCT examination - OCT-angiography examination - retinography Primary endpoint. - central retinal thickness, measured by OCT