View clinical trials related to Disorder of Consciousness.
Filter by:Background: Despite established evidence supporting the use of tDCS in the adult patient with disorders of consciousness, its use in paediatric patients with brain injury is still limited. Regarding the use of tDCS in paediatric patients with DoC, the scientific evidence still appears to be preliminary about the safety profile and requires further data before investigating efficacy on a broad scale. In fact, although the method has been shown to be safe in other clinical conditions, efficacy and tolerability in children with DoC may vary significantly depending on differences in activation threshold and the presence of underlying pathological electrical activity The implementation of clinical trials investigating the safety and tolerability of tDCS in paediatric patients with DoC now represents an essential first step for a future determination of the efficacy of this method in a population for which therapeutic options are currently extremely limited Objective: The study aim to verify the safety of tDCS treatment and to evaluate the effectiveness of stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex by tDCS in promoting improvement in the level of consciousness in paediatric patients with Disorders of Consciousness. Method: in this mono-center, randomised, double blind cross-over controlled pilot study, real or sham tDCS were applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPF) cortex of paediatric patients with disorders of consciousness for two weeks, followed by two weeks of washout, then real or sham tDCS were applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPF) cortex for other two weeks, followed by another two weeks of washout.
This study first aims to validate the feasibility of a multimodal 5-day 20-minute tACS protocol in subacute brain-injured patients with a disorder of consciousness during their ICU stay, and conduct a clinical pilot study (validation phase). Upon completion of this validation phase and according to obtained results, a randomized clinical trial will be conducted to compare the effects of the 5-day active 10Hz-tACS protocol with a 5-day sham-tACS protocol on brain dynamics modulation. This study will also compare intervention conditions on recovery of consciousness, cognition and function using short-term and long-term measurements.
A randomized controlled study was conducted to explore the efficacy of early transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to promote wakefulness in patients with disorder of consciousness (DOC). In order to improve the prognosis of DOC patients with nontraumatic brain injury, we compared the effects of tDCS and rTMS on clinical behavior and neurophysiological performance, and selected a wake-up technique that could improve the prognosis of DOC patients with nontraumatic brain injury as early as possible, so as to reduce the pain of patients and their loved ones, and to reduce the economic burden of society and families.
The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of emotional sound as subject own name (SON) pronounced by a familiar voice (FV) compared to SON pronounced by a non-familiar voice (NFV) during event related potential (ERP) produced a more reliable neurophysiological P300 responses, and to assess the prognostic value of this P300 responses induced by the SON with a FV.
Patients with hydrocephalus are usually treated with cerebrospinal fluid (CFS) shunt to deal with excess cerebrospinal fluid in the brain. However, it is difficult to distinguish whether ventricular enlargement is due to hydrocephalus or other causes, such as brain injury and compensatory brain atrophy after surgery. Therefore, it is important to predict whether shunting will help patients. For this reason, clinicians must be cautious when treating patients with shunt therapy. Important assessments of the level of consciousness and continuous lumbar tap test are currently clinically common predictors before making decisions about CFS shunt therapy. However, for patients with serious disturbance of consciousness, it is difficult to predict the prognosis of surgery by observing the improvement of symptoms after lumbar tap test, which brings difficulties to the majority of clinical workers, and also easy to bring serious psychological and economic burden to patients. In clinical practice, clinicians still lack a stable and objective method to predict postoperative outcomes for these patients. In this clinical study, when participants performed the cerebrospinal fluid tap test to evaluate whether or not cerebrospinal fluid shunt was performed, various predictors that may be associated with CSF shunt outcomes before and after cerebrospinal fluid tap test were collected, including imaging data, EEG characteristics and changes in cerebrospinal fluid pressure. In addition, the researchers will collect the improvement of consciousness disturbance in patients with hydrocephalus before and after cerebrospinal fluid shunt, in order to explore the correlation between preoperative imaging data, EEG characteristics, the results of cerebrospinal fluid tap test and the improvement of consciousness disorders. A scheme of consciousness assessment based on the results of imaging, EEG and tap test results afte CSF tap test was proposed.
Object: To determine the effect of cerebrolysin on prolonged disorders of consciousness caused by hemorrhagic stroke. Participants: patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness due to severe traumatic brain injury Intervention: 30 ml cerebrolysin + 70 ml normal saline, days 4-17, once/day, intravenously or 100 ml normal saline, days 4-17, once/day, IV Comparison: cerebrolysin group versus control group Outcome: Coma Recovery Scale-revised, FDG-PET signal
Background: Severe brain injury could cause chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC). Treating DOC patients to improve recovery remains very challenging. A few randomized controlled studies have been published in the recent years, focusing on non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) treatments to improve patients' neurobehavioural functioning. Among NIBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate cortical excitability, enhance neural plasticity, and induce strong neuromodulatory effects that outlast the period of stimulation. It is thought to modulate cortical activity and could therefore be effective for treating DOC patients. Currently, there is no unified protocol for rTMS in DOC patients and studies vary in many aspects. In this study, the investigators aim to improve the functional recovery of DOC patients following severe brain injury using rTMS in two multi-center double-blind studies. Methods/design: The investigators will recruit 90 DOC patients. Patients will have three rTMS sessions that will be randomized within patients in a crossover design: (i) one real stimulation on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC); (ii) one real stimulation on the left angular cortex (AG) and (iii) one sham stimulation. Sessions will be separated by at least 5 days washout period. Each stimulation session will last 20 minutes with a frequency of 20Hz (train duration: 4s; inter-train interval: 26s; 3200 pulses at 80% of the resting motor threshold - RMT). The RMT, i.e., the minimum stimulus intensity that generated a motor evoked potential response of at least 50μV at rest for 5 out of 10 trials, will be calculated for the stimulation target using single-pulses on the right abductor pollicis brevis muscle. After an interval of one week, a parallel design study will begin. Ninety patients will be randomly divided in two experimental groups and one sham group (30 patients per group). Stimulation will be performed for 20 working days once a day with the same stimulation parameters as in the crossover study. Primary outcome will be determined as behavioral response to treatment as measured using the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R). Resting-state high-density EEG will be also recorded to investigate the neurophysiological correlates by rTMS. Discussion: This study will contribute to define the role of rTMS for the treatment of DOC patients and characterise the neural correlates of its action. In addition, the investigators will define the responders' profile based on patients' characteristics and functional impairments and develop biomarkers of responsiveness using machine learning to categorize EEG signals according to clinical responsiveness to the treatment.
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled project, the investigators would like to assess the effect of a specific light, as compared to placebo light, on wakefulness (circadian rhythms, homeostasy, sleep-wake cycle), awareness (perceptual and self consciousness), cognition (attention, memory) and underlying brain activity (electrophysiology and neuroimaging)