View clinical trials related to Diet, Healthy.
Filter by:This study will address the following aims: Aim 1: Conduct an 8-week pilot RCT to examine the effects of a whole foods diet intervention on body adiposity in adolescents with obesity. Aim 1a (Primary): Evaluate intervention effectiveness on total fat mass following the 8-week intervention. Hypothesis 1a: Adolescents randomized to the whole foods intervention will have lower total fat mass (kg) at the 8-week follow-up than those in the control group. Aim 1b: Evaluate intervention effectiveness on anthropometric changes following the 8-week intervention. Hypothesis 1b: Adolescents randomized to the whole foods intervention will have lower weight, BMI-z scores and/or waist circumference at the 8-week follow-up than those in the control group. Secondary Aims: Aim 2: Conduct an 8-week pilot RCT to examine the effects of a whole foods diet intervention on diet quality in adolescent and parent pairs during the study period. Hypothesis 2: Adolescents and parents randomized to the whole foods intervention will have higher diet quality scores at the 8-week follow-up than those in the control group. Aim 3: Conduct post-intervention family focus groups to identify how individual/family needs and preferences and social determinants of health (SDOH) may be perceived barriers and/or facilitators of diet adherence to a whole foods diet pattern.
Using a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) and an intercept survey, the investigators aim to evaluate the effects of the Multiple-Traffic Light (MTL) front-of-pack (FOP) food labels in Bahrain, on diet quality of grocery shoppers in the Kingdom of Bahrain. The investigators will use an experimental online grocery store, called Bahrain e-Mart, which is similar in design to commercial web-based grocery stores to test these labels. Participants will complete an online shopping experiment on Bahrain e-Mart such that those assigned to the control arm and those assigned to the intervention arm would be exposed to food and beverage products with no FOP labels and with MTL labels, respectively. Participants will randomly be assigned to one of the following arms and asked to complete a one-time shop. Arm 1 (Control): Participants will experience a default version of Bahrain e-Mart which replicates the traditional shopping experience of online grocery stores with no FOP labels. Arm 2 (MTL): Same as Arm 1 Bahrain e-Mart except that Multiple-Traffic Light (MTL) labels are displayed on all food and beverage products. The investigators hypothesize the following: Hypothesis 1: Diet quality, as measured by weighted (by the number of servings) average of all purchased products' Multiple Traffic Light scores for the shopping trip, will be greater in Arm 2 as compared to Control. Multiple Traffic Light is a nutrition labelling system wherein each nutrient attribute constituting this label is assigned different colours according to whether the amount of that nutrient is low (green), medium (amber) or high (red). Hypothesis 2: Diet quality, as measured by weighted (by the number of servings) average of all purchased products' Nutri-Score points for the shopping trip, will be greater in Arm 2 as compared to Control. Relying on the British Food Standard Agency Nutrient Profiling System, the Nutri-Score (NS) point system assigns points to each product based on levels of 7 nutrients (calories, saturated fats, sugar, salt, fibre, protein and percentage of fruits, vegetables, and nuts) per 100g or 100 ml to assess overall nutritional quality. The final NS points range from 0 to 55, with 0 being the least healthy score and 55 the healthiest. Hypothesis 3: The weighted (by the number of servings) average calories (kcal), sugar (g), sodium (mg), total fat (g), and saturated fat (g) per serving will be less in Arm 2 as compared to Control.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if increasing adherence to a Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet pattern improves brain and heart health relative to a healthy control diet in middle-aged adults.The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the MIND diet improve cognitive performance and heart health relative to a control diet? Researchers will compare the MIND diet group to a control (a healthy diet that does not match the MIND diet) to see if the MIND provides more benefit to health. Participants will: Consume one meal that follows the MIND diet or a control meal every day for 3 months Visit the lab before and after the 3 months of meals for tests. Keep a record of the food they eat during the study.
A cross-sectional study representative of the Polish population of children aged 5 months to 6 years conducted in the cross-sectional study model, the main objective of which is to assess the nutritional value of the diet of children aged from 5 months to 6 years with regard to the basic macronutrients: protein (P), fat (F), carbohydrates (C). The study will include: dietary interviews, which will include the Food Frequency Questionnaire questionnaire (FFQ) and a 3-day food diary, as well as anthropometric measurements. The study will involve 1,000 children who will be selected by a random draw based on government database. The survey will be conducted by trained field interviewers - training will be provided by a dietician and an anthropologist. The study also included validation of the FFQ questionnaire.
Meals on Wheels of Rhode Island (MOWRI), in partnership with the University of Connecticut (UConn), will implement and evaluate an enhanced version of its Home-Delivered Meals Program (HDMP). The project goal is to implement and test the effectiveness of an enhanced Home-Delivered Meals (HDM) service delivery approach. The enhanced approach includes community health worker (CHW) interactions and supplemental healthy grocery bags to address diet quality, food and nutrition security, loneliness, and health-related quality of life for older adults. MOWRI participants at the highest nutritional risk will be randomized to receive standard or enhanced services in order to test the effect of the intervention on health-related outcomes. Anticipated outcomes for individuals receiving enhanced services are improvements in measures of diet quality, food and nutrition security, loneliness, and health-related quality of life compared with those receiving standard HDM services.
This is a cluster randomized controlled trial of 30 food pantries affiliated with the Greater Boston Food Bank to test the use of behavioral economics (BE) tools to encourage food pantries to implement the Supporting Wellness at Pantries (SWAP) program, with the goal of fostering accurate use of SWAP traffic light labels on pantry shelves and increasing the healthfulness of foods chosen by pantry clients. Primary outcomes will be assessed at 6 and 12 months to compare the implementation and effectiveness of the SWAP program in the intervention vs. control pantries.
Purpose: The overall purpose of this study is to identify the impacts of an ultra-processed (UPF) health warning label and UPF identify warning label compared to a control label (i.e., a barcode). Participants: ~4,000 US Latino adults of parental age (18-55 years), approximately 50% of whom will have limited English proficiency, recruited from a Latino-focused panel company. Procedures: Participants will be randomly assigned to view food products with one of three label types: health warning labels, identity labels, or barcode control labels. Participants will be asked a series of questions about the products and the label they were assigned.
This study aims to assess whether different message framing about front-of-package labeling policies elicits more policy support than the control (no framing) among Latino and limited English proficiency populations. The study also seeks to identify which message framing elicits the most policy support.
The goal of this experiment is to examine the effects of 4 types of front-of-package food labels among a sample of Latino adults. The main questions this experiment aims to answer are: What front-of-package label design is most effective in helping Latino and low English proficiency consumers identify healthier and less healthy food products? What front-of-package label design is most effective in helping Latino and low English proficiency consumers choose healthier food products? Additionally, this experiment also aims to answer the following question: Do the benefits of front-of-package label designs differ by English proficiency and parental status? Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 4 types of front-of-package label designs and view their assigned label design on 3 sets of products. Each set will display 3 similar products, each high in either 1, 2, or 3 nutrients of concern. For each set, participants will select the product that they believe to be the healthiest, least healthy, and the product that they would most want to consume. Researchers will compare results across label designs.
The goal of this clinical trial is to conduct a dietary intervention targeting HIV-specific gut microbiota alterations for primary ASCVD prevention and evaluate its effectiveness in preventing borderline ASCVD risk among HIV-infected patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Explore the pivotal role of the gut-heart axis in the causal relationship between HIV infection and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. - Develop a targeted dietary intervention focusing on gut microbiota to prevent the borderline risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected patients. - Evaluate the effectiveness of the gut microbiota-targeted dietary intervention in reducing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk among HIV-infected patients, altering gut microbiota composition, improving risk factors of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and alleviating prodromal symptoms associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Participants in the intervention group will receive the gut microbiota-targeted dietary intervention thrice weekly for 3 months, accompanied by bi-weekly health education videos for the same duration. Meanwhile, the control group will continue routine follow-up and health education practices. The intervention will span three months, followed by a three-month follow-up period. Data collection will occur at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.