View clinical trials related to Dexmedetomidine.
Filter by:This study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of intravenous aminophylline on hemodynamics and recovery of patients receiving dexmedetomidine infusion during functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
A total of 120 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status 1-3) who signed a consent form among patients aged 19-80 years who are scheduled to undergo brachial plexus block and upper extremity surgery under monitored anesthetic care at our hospital were enrolled. Recruited patients are divided into three groups through computer-generated randomization by using the patient identification number assigned during patient recruitment. (40 people in each group) Standard monitoring is performed when the patient arrives at the operating room. Patients receive oxygen at 5-6 L/min using a simple facial mask, and receive a brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance. After confirming the success of brachial plexus block, administration of propofol, remimazolam, or dexmedetomidine is started according to the assigned group. Assess the patient's level of consciousness through the MOAA/S (modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale) scale. The drug injection ends when the skin suture is started after the main procedure. The time from the end of injection of each drug until MOAA/S becomes 5 points is measured. After the patient is transferred to the recovery room, the Aldrete score is assessed. The recovery profile, perioperative hemodynamic change, desaturation event, block duration, patient movement during surgery, patient satisfaction, and surgeon's satisfaction were investigated and analyzed for comparison.
The investigators compared the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine administered under general anesthesia on hemodynamics, postoperative pain, recovery, postoperative nausea, vomiting, shivering, patient's and surgeon's satisfaction in patients undergoing elective rhinoplasty. A single-center, prospective, blinded, randomized controlled trial. After the approval of the hospital ethics committee (KA22/12), fifty volunteers aged 18-65 years who underwent rhinoplasty under elective conditions accepted the study in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III class. The patients were randomly divided into the remifentanil group (group R) and the dexmedetomidine group (group D). Group R (n=25) was initially to receive remifentanil 0.01-0.2 g/kg/min without intraoperative loading. Group D (n=25) dexmedetomidine, was initiated with a bolus of 1 mg/kg and received 0.2-0.7 g/kg per hour as an infusion during surgery.
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia (IVRA) is an easy and reliable anesthetic technique for hand and forearm surgery. Its use is however limited by the presence of tourniquet pain during the surgery and the absence of postoperative analgesia. Many adjuvants to local anesthetics have been studied in order to overcome these shortcomings, including α2 adrenergic agonists. Clonidine has been shown to be efficacious when used with IVRA at a dose of 1µg/kg. Dexmetedomidine (DEX) is a recent more selective α2 adrenergic agonist that has been used successfully during IVRA at a dose of 0.5µg/kg. However when comparing potency ratios of Clonidine and DEX (8 to 1), the investigators hypothesize that a lower DEX dose would provide patients with adequate anesthesia. We will determine the population average dose of DEX (ED50) that provides 50 minutes of tolerance to the tourniquet during a Lidocaine IVRA by a sequential Dixon up-down allocation study. Eligible patients will be enrolled after obtaining informed consent. Patients will receive a standardized IVRA with Lidocaine and DEX adjuvant following a sequential allocation scheme. The first patient will receive a dose of 0.5 µg/kg of DEX. The dose will be then adjusted in 0.1 µg/kg increments for the following patients dependent on the success of the previous patients block. If a patient experiences tourniquet pain prior to 50 minutes after inflation of the distal tourniquet the next patient will receive a higher dose, if he does not experience pain prior to 50 minutes after inflation of the distal tourniquet the dose for the following patient will be decreased. Recruitment will continue until 6 independent crossovers are observed with a minimum of 20 patients. The mean and the standard deviation of the ED50 of DEX will be calculated using the modified up-down method. This study will help determine the ED50 of DEX used as an adjuvant in IVRA. Based on the potency ratios of Clonidine vs. DEX, the investigators hypothesize that the dose of DEX needed to achieve 50 minutes of pain free tourniquet time will be closer to 0.125 µg/kg rather than 0.5 µg/kg, a 75% reduction in the dose studied.
Malignancy related abdominal and pelvic pain can be debilitating and affects survival as well as quality of life. Pain from cancer and its treatments can result in anxiety, depression, fear, anger, helplessness, and hopelessness, and those with both pain and depression have an amplification of disability and poor quality of life Pancreatic and other upper abdominal organ malignancies can produce intense visceral pain syndromes that are frequently treated with splanchnic nerve neurolysis (SNN) or celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN). Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha two adreno-receptor agonist. It provides dose-dependent sedation, analgesia, sympatholysis, and anxiolysis without relevant respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine is used as adjuvant to LA drugs in peripheral nerve block, brachial plexus block and intrathecal anesthesia with satisfactory results. The aim of this study is to evaluate effect of addition of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to alcohol and local anesthetics for chemical neurolysis to control pain in patients with intra-abdominal malignancy.
The aim of work to assess the effect of different doses of Dexmedetomidine when used as an adjuvant to entropy-guided general anesthesia on the intraoperative surgical field quality, inhaled anesthesia consumption and postoperative analgesia requirement during FESS surgeries.
Inhalational induction with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen is accepted as a safe technique to avoid any movement during intravenous cannulation in children. In addition, intranasal dexmedetomidine could be used for premedication to reduce preoperative anxiety in preschool children. Early attempts to place, an intravenous line may result in movement and respiratory complications like coughing or laryngospasm. On the other hand delay in cannulation may prevent effective management of bradycardia and hypotension. There are a number of studies examining the optimum time for cannulation after sevoflurane induction. However, it is not known whether the addition of dexmedetomidine premedication affects the time for intravenous cannulation following induction with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide.
Awake craniotomy require a cooperative patient during resection neurosurgery phase. Anesthesiologist should guarantee analgesia, sedation, nausea and vomiting prevention, while maintaining normal vital parameters. Neurosurgeon could be help by Intraoperative electrocorticography to maximise lesion resection and avoiding neurologic sequelae. Propofol and remifentanyl have been largely used. Dexmedetomidine represents an alternative. However little is known about the role of dexmedetomidine on Intraoperative electrocorticography.
The proposed pilot study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, single-center pilot study.The aim of this pilot project is to evaluate the feasibility of a phase III study on the use of dexmedetomidine in intrathecal in the context of elective cesarean section. The target population for the study will be adult pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. This study will be carried out at a single site, the CHU Sainte-Justine as part of a research internship as part of the anesthesiology residency program at the University of Montreal.
The perioperative management of pain following abdominal surgery can pose a challenge to anesthesia providers. Conventional practice has involved the use of opioids as well as neuraxial analgesic techniques. Unfortunately, these therapies are not without potential risks and side effects. These include nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, constipation, respiratory depression, and sedation.