View clinical trials related to Depressive Disorder, Major.
Filter by:This is a randomised double-blind clinical trial. The aim is to compare the efficacy and mechanisms of action of psilocybin, the primary psychoactive substance in 'magic mushrooms', with the SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) escitalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD).
This project will assess the effectiveness of a stepped-care model (i.e. digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (dCBT-I) followed by face-to-face CBT-I) in improving severity of insomnia and sleep outcomes in an insomnia cohort. This project will also investigate the effectiveness of this stepped-care model in prevention of major depressive disorder, and will test rumination as a mediator of treatment response.
The OPTIMA-Study: Optimized Treatment Identification at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry: An outline Depressive disorders represent one of the most frequent diseases worldwide. Schema therapy, which was originally developed for patients with personality disorders and focuses on emotion activating techniques, became popular in the field of psychotherapy in the recent years and was also applied on axis-I-disorders such as depression. The current study aims to close the gap of increasing popularity of ST and missing empirical evidence of its effectiveness. This aim breaks down into three main research questions dealing with (1) general effectiveness of ST measured by multiple operationalizations (i.e. depressive symptoms, biological markers, relapse prevention, or need for medication), (2) specific effectiveness of ST (i.e. interpersonal problems and emotion regulation), and (3) the identification of parameters in the sense of an individualized psychotherapy approach in order to fit patient needs with certain psychotherapy offers. After participants have given informed consent, they undergo a comprehensive baseline measurement which covers psychometric measures (such as questionnaires and clinical ratings), biological parameters (blood samples, endocrine activity), neuropsychological testing (such as word fluency), and actimetry measures (circadian rhythms). After finishing the diagnostic procedure, participants will be randomized to three different experimental conditions: (1) a schema therapy condition, (2) a cognitive behavioral therapy condition, and (3) an individualized supportive therapy condition. After undergoing a comprehensive baseline measurement process in study week one, patients participate in an intensive seven-week-treatment-program, in addition to the regular pharmacological treatment, which is not object of the study. The measures are repeated during the fourth and seventh week of psychotherapeutical treatment and on the occasion of a follow-up visit six months after discharge from the clinic. Additionally, the investigators test among sub-samples the effects of psychotherapeutical interventions on psychophysiological outcomes, sleep-patterns, and neuronal substrates in the context of emotional regulation and social interaction. Thus, the study will give valuables insights in the effectiveness of an innovative psychotherapy approach and breaks new ground in the field of individualized psychotherapy and its biological implications.
Many patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and generalized Social Anxiety Disorder (gSAD) are treated with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) but few have meaningful improvement. MDD and gSAD are diseases of brain dysfunction that manifest as impaired emotion regulation; CBT teaches emotion regulation strategies but how it works in the brain remains largely unknown. Individual differences in brain function related to emotion regulation may make some patients better suited for CBT and CBT may remedy the brain dysfunction that underlies these disorders. This project will compare CBT with a placebo psychotherapy (i.e., supportive therapy) in MDD and gSAD to test, validate, and refine brain-based markers and examine mechanisms of change to examine how CBT works and for whom.
Escitalopram has been approved by FDA in the treatment of adolescents with major depressive disorder since March 2009. To date, there are only 3 clinical trials assessing the effect and validity of escitalopram on major depressive disorder, which of them has resulted in inconsistent findings. In the present study, the authors aimed to assess the effect and validity of this drug in the treatment of adolescents with major depressive disorder and or anxiety disorders.
The purpose of the study is to learn more about computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy or "CCBT" and to examine connections in the brains of patients with depression. CCBT is approved by the FDA as a form of treatment for depression. It is done partly on the computer and partly with a therapist. This study will enroll participants with depression and participants without depression. The investigators will recruit a total of 100 participants: 80 with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and 50 matched comparison participants. Healthy control subjects will participate for approximately 8 weeks. All MDD participants will receive CCBT. Half of the MDD participants will all receive computer-augmented skills training with the Good Days Ahead (GDA) protocol immediately (Early CCBT). Early CCBT subjects will participate for approximately 8 weeks. The other half of the MDD participants initially will be randomized to a waitlist of up to 4 weeks and subsequently will receive CCBT treatment (Late CCBT). Late CCBT subjects will participate for approximately 12 weeks. All participants are asked to complete a screening, which includes a series of clinical interviews and self-report questionnaires about the individual's thoughts, moods, and behaviors. All participants are asked to wear an actigraph, which is a watch-like device that measures activity levels. Additionally, participants are asked to completed short questions and have their activity levels monitored through phone app(s). All participants (Healthy Control and MDD participants) will receive functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning at baseline. Early CCBT participants will receive fMRI scanning after 8 weeks of CCBT, and Late CCBT participants will receive fMRI scanning at the conclusion of the waitlist and after the 8-week course of CCBT. Brain activity will be compared between MDD and controls at baseline and between Early CCBT vs Late CCBT. The 2nd and 3rd brain scans of Late CCBT participants at the end of the waitlist and 8-week course of CCBT, respectively, will allow within-subject comparison of CCBT vs Waitlist treatment effects. This clinical trial has two IRB protocol numbers: 826910 and 832295. The data collected through both protocol numbers will be analyzed together to accomplish the target of 100 subjects for this clinical trial.
The overall goals of this project are to assess the feasibility and impact of designing and implementing an at-home intervention aimed at preventing long-term cognitive decline and improving cognition in individuals currently at-risk for developing AD.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects around 7% of the population yearly. Although effective treatments are available, only around half of all patients participating in clinical trials respond to 6 to 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment. Given these high failure rates, the ability to predict as early as possible whether a patient is (un)likely to respond would be of great value, as it would enable physicians to change treatment strategies faster. Early improvement has consistently been found to be a strong predictor of later response. However, misclassification is still quite common, with perhaps a third of those who do not show early improvement going on to respond. Conversely, a substantial proportion of those who do show early improvement do not go on to respond. One possibility for improving the predictive power of early improvement is to examine individual symptoms, rather than the total score on a depression rating scale. Some items, for example, could reflect antidepressant side effects (e.g. gastrointestinal symptoms) and may not be very predictive. The proposed project aims to examine the relationship between early improvement in individual symptoms and response to antidepressants in a very large patient sample. This large sample size makes it possible to use more rigorous methods than previous studies, such as the use of cross-validation to confirm the findings. It also makes it possible to examine a large set of predictors, including possible interactions among early-improving symptoms and between symptoms and demographic factors like age and gender. The added value of individual symptoms over and above using the total symptom score alone will also be examined, as well as possible differences between different antidepressant classes. The project will use penalized (lasso) regression, which is well-suited to analyzing data with a large number of (potentially highly correlated) predictors. In the primary analysis, response after 6 weeks of treatment will be predicted. In secondary analyses, remission at week 6 and response and remission at week 12 will also be predicted.
Suicidal behavior (SB) is a public health problem. The clinical model currently admitted to the understanding of SB is a stress vulnerability model, but so far, all scientific works has no clinical application. The management of psychiatric patients, including depressed subjects, faces the inability to detect those with a high risk of SB. Many studies have shown a link between low cholesterol and SB. A study has recently proposed a total cholesterol threshold below which the risk of suicide could be increased. However, a prospective study is needed to assess the predictive nature of such an indicator.
This study will assign patients to two types of psychotherapies in treating people with a major depression disorder, expressive versus supportive techniques, and will examine their ability to benefit from treatment based on their attachment orientation. This is a four month protocol, with a year follow up period, will compare patients receiving supportive-expressive treatment with either expressive focus or supportive focus.