View clinical trials related to Depressive Disorder, Major.
Filter by:The main objective of this research project is to implement and evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a Blended Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (bCBT) in routine practice, comparing it with Treatment as Usual (TAU). This research project includes a pilot study and a randomized clinical trial (RCT). The pilot study main objective is to adapt the bCBT based on Moodbuster, an internet-based treatment platform developed by the ICT4Depression Consortium (INESC-TEC, Vrije Universiteit and University of Limerick), to the Portuguese population. More specifically, this pilot study intends: (1) to detect problems and refine procedures, establishing a definitive Portuguese version of the blended treatment; (2) to assess clinical effectiveness (non-controlled), estimating effect sizes at the end of the treatment and follow-up; (3) to assess patients' satisfaction and personal views concerning their process of change; (4) to develop dynamic models of the individual trajectories during treatment based on Ecological Momentary Assessments. The pilot study will involve the participation of psychologists trained in bCBT and 20 participants diagnosed with Major Depression and willing to use the Moodbuster system. The RCT is composed by two arms (an experimental condition and a control condition) and it will be implemented in routine practice. In the experimental condition, the patients diagnosed with Major Depression will receive a treatment that integrates face-to-face cognitive-behavioral sessions with online sessions available through Moodbuster system (bCBT). In the control condition, patients diagnosed with Major Depression will receive TAU that consists in routine care that patients receive in primary care. The RCT will involve the participation of family doctors and psychologists working in routine practice. One-hundred patients will be recruited and randomized in the two conditions: 50 patients for bCBT condition and 50 patients for TAU condition. The main objectives are: (1) to assess the clinical effectiveness of bCBT and compare it with TAU in routine practice; (2) to estimate and compare cost-effectiveness of both treatments; (3) to assess patients' and clinicians' satisfaction with the bCBT and TAU; (4) to refine the previous models of individual trajectories and to assess differential effects on different patient clusters; (5) to establish guidelines for using bCBT within Portuguese routine practice services.
Antidepressants is the primary treatment for depression, but only less than 50% of the patients get clinical remission. There is no objective markers to select antidepressants for clinical treatment . Clinical choose usually use experience and waste a lot of time, even the patients cannot be treated timely and effectively. The investigators found that the later antidepressant effect for 8 weeks is related with early brain functional response. Present prospectively drug treatment and follow-up study intends to adopt pharmacological imaging research methods to detect the brain function or structure change of three different mechanisms of antidepressant drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs, escitalopram), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs, duloxetine), norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRIs, bupropion) in depression patients. Brain functional or structural magnetic resonance imaging data were collected at baseline, 1 days, 14 days and 12 weeks after treatment. The investigators want to observe the changes of brain functional networks and structure at different time points, acute and chronic treatment induced during drug treatment. Combined with the blood concentration detection, symptom change, cognitive function tests, the investigators also hope to determine the different mechanisms of drug efficacy of antidepressants with different mechanisms. The second aim is to explore different mechanisms of brain function for effective or ineffective drug response. The results of the study will help to further explain the mechanism of different antidepressants, to facilitate the development of early indicators for drug efficacy and individual treatment decision.
Depression is a common issue but there is no marker of response to an antidepressant treatment.The measurement of variation of the cortical excitability in responders to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) (compared to no-responders) had never been done before. In the study of Robol et al. (2004) concerning the acute effects of citalopram on markers of cortical excitability, the authors have pointed out an increase on the cortical silent period (CSP) after administration of citalopram (2.5 hours). The investigators hypothesize that this effect remains later and that the diminution of cortical excitability could be a biomarker of antidepressant response. In this case, they expect that the variation of CSP between day 1 and day 28 is higher in responders to a SSRI (citalopram) compared to non-responders. the investigators lead a pilot, prospective, multicentric study in drug-naive patients to compare the variation of the markers of cortical excitability (the CSP but to the resting motor threshold RMT, the motor evoked potential MEP, the intra-cortical inhibition ICI and the intra-cortical facilitation ICF) between day 1 and day 28 in responders to citalopram, compared to non-responders.
During the past three decades, researchers have paid particular attention to the study of olfactory disorders in depression. Recent studies have shown that depression is characterized by a change in olfactory and emotional perception resulting in a decrease of the perception of positive stimuli (odors and facial expressions) and an increase in perception of negative stimuli (odors). Moreover, it has also been shown in healthy subjects that the presence of minor depressive symptoms leads to a decreasing of olfactory sensitivity. However, odor discrimination was not impaired in these subjects. This observation suggest the presence of a change in "targeted" olfactory perception in people with depressive symptoms without reporting major depression. In addition, studies in subjects with olfactory disorders (following respiratory tract infections or following Parkinson's disease) have shown an improvement in olfactory function after daily training with odors during 12 weeks. From all these observations, the hypothesis is that an olfactory training could improve the overall olfactory functioning and the emotional perception of the subjects presenting minor depressive symptoms and of the depressed patients.
Severe mental illness (SMI) refers to the most burdensome psychiatric conditions. The need to pre-empt the onset of SMI is pressing because once SMI develops, quality of life is poor and available treatments have limited efficacy. Most risk factors for SMI are either unchangeable (e.g., genetics) or difficult to alter (e.g., low socio-economic status). In contrast, cannabis use is one specific risk factor that could be avoided. Certain individuals are more vulnerable to the harmful effects of cannabis. Genetic factors can help us identify these high-risk individuals. One in three individuals are carriers of a higher-risk genetic variant, and cannabis users with this genotype are at up to 7-fold increased risk of developing schizophrenia. In our study, genetic counselling will be provided to participants by a board-certified genetic counsellor. During the genetic counselling session, participants will have the option to receive their genotype. Participants will be counselled regarding their individualized risk of developing and of not developing SMI based on family history, whether or not they choose to use cannabis, and genotype (if the participants accept the genetic test results). The investigators hypothesize that this intervention will reduce exposure to cannabis compared to the youth who are not offered the intervention.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical curative effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy(MBCT) for major depressive disorder(MDD). Moreover, we will also explore the relationship between P300 potential and erroneous negative potential (ERN) variation and clinical symptoms in MDD and MBCT. This study is a randomized-control trial with two study arms: half of patient cases will receive usual medication treatment with the serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and half of patient cases will receive MBCT added to the usual medication treatment. This study is also a case-control trial, there will be matched normal controls compared with patient cases through a range of psychological scales and electroencephalogram.
This is a parallel randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial in which a total of 72 drug-naïve MDD subjects (36 per arm) are randomized to one of two groups: Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT) combined with either active or sham tDCS. The primary outcome is mood improvement, as measured by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The secondary outcome is to test whether tDCS combined with CBT can engage the proposed mechanistic target, of restoring the prefrontal imbalance and connectivity, by changes over EEG.
HYPOTHESIS: Pregnenolone administration will be associated with greater reduction in depressive symptom severity than placebo in women with current mMDD. STUDY AIMS: Primary Aim: Determine if pregnenolone is associated with greater reduction in depressive symptom severity than placebo in women with mMDD, as measured by MADRS. Secondary Aims: 1. Determine if pregnenolone is associated with greater reduction in anxiety symptom severity than placebo in women with mMDD. 2. Determine if pregnenolone is associated with greater improvement in cognition than placebo in women with mMDD. 3. Determine if pregnenolone is associated with greater improvement in quality of life than placebo in women with mMDD. 4. Determine if pregnenolone is associated with greater improvement in vasomotor symptoms of menopause than placebo. Mechanistic Aims: 1. Determine whether changes in neurosteroid levels with pregnenolone mediate clinical response. 2. Determine if baseline neurosteroid levels predict pregnenolone response. 3. Determine whether depressive symptoms, anxiety, sleep or vasomotor symptoms improve first. A crossed-lagged panel model will explore serial correlations between changes in outcome measures.
Major depressive disorder is the number one cause of disability worldwide. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of various treatments for patients with severe depression is still lacking. Although many patients achieve treatment response, only a minority of patients achieve full remission and even fewer sustain it. In fact, within one month 10% will be re-hospitalized and the rate climbs to 30% within a year. Further, remission from depressive symptoms is a surprisingly poor predictor of recovery of community functioning following discharge. It is clear that the traditional focus on diagnostic symptoms is insufficient for promoting a full return to everyday functioning. The present aim is to examine the efficacy and effectiveness of treating neurocognition, a symptom that explains persistent deficits in community functioning for those with depression. The study design that maps on to the contemporary clinical setting, in order to reflect the changing landscape of inpatient and community treatment.
The goal of the study is to address the unmet need of TRD patients by identifying brain networks critical for treating depression and to use next generation precision DBS with steering capability to engage these targeted networks. The study's goal will be achieved through 3 specific aims: 1. Demonstrate device capability to selectively and predictably engage distinct brain networks 2. Delineate depression-relevant networks and demonstrate behavioral changes with network-targeted stimulation 3. Demonstrate that chronic DBS using steered, individualized targeting is feasible and safe for reducing depressive symptoms