View clinical trials related to Depressive Disorder, Major.
Filter by:Depressive rumination, a negative thinking style characterized by repetitive and passive thoughts about the causes, meanings, and consequences of one's feelings and distress, is often described as being a habitual response tendency that forms a vulnerability to depression. Behavioural Activation (BA) is an effective treatment for depression but little is known of mechanisms of changes during a successful treatment completion and for whom the treatment benefits the most. The main purpose of the study is to investigate whether habit-like mood-reactive rumination will change during Behavioral Activation treatment for current depression and mediates symptom changes in the treatment. Important moderators of change will also be investigated (i.e. history of early life stress and cognitive flexibility). We aim to provide individual BA treatment for up to 130 currently depressed participants in 12 treatment sessions over 11 weeks. Measures are obtained at pre-treatment, during treatment, at post-treatment and at 6 month follow up.
The goal of this randomized placebo controlled trial is to compare the antidepressant effect of a single oral dose of psilocybin 25 mg compared to 1 mg in 100 patients with cancer related major depressive disorder. The main question it aims to answer is: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a single 25 mg oral dose of psilocybin for major depressive disorder (MDD) compared to an active placebo (psilocybin 1 mg) assessed as the difference between groups in changes in depressive symptoms, in the following Population: 20-80 (inclusive) years old, current depressive episode (according to Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) ≥10), >1 month after cancer diagnosis, with at least 12 months of life expectancy, willingness to abstain from other psychotherapeutic or antidepressant treatments during the study (wash out time 5 half-lives).
This two-armed randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effectiveness of an emotion regulation intervention in individuals with and without depressive disorders. The study encompasses participants diagnosed with mild to moderate major depression or persistent depressive disorder and healthy controls without a current depressive disorder. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group, receiving a valence-specific emotion regulation intervention in daily life, or a monitoring-only control group. The valence-specific intervention supports the implementation of different emotion regulation strategies based on whether a person is experiencing mainly positive or negative emotions. In contrast, participants in the control group will solely monitor their positive and negative emotions and the strategies used to regulate them. Outcome measures include emotion regulation ability, self-efficacy, and strategy use, depressive symptoms, positive and negative affect, and emotion beliefs (controllability, usefulness). A second aim of the study is to compare beliefs about positive emotions and strategies to regulate them between individuals with and without current depressive disorders. Furthermore, the investigators aim to examine why individuals might choose unfavorable emotion regulation strategies even when feeling good. Therefore, another research question is, how emotion beliefs might explain emotion regulation strategy choice.
The aim of this Phase 2a study in patients with MDD is to assess safety and tolerability and preliminary antidepressant efficacy.
Approximately 240 eligible adult participants (≥18 years old) who meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR) criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of Psilocybin 25 mg, Psilocybin 5 mg, or inactive placebo. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Psilocybin 25 mg versus placebo in adults with MDD, as assessed by the difference between groups in change in depressive symptoms from Baseline to Day 43 post-dose, and to characterize the durability of initial treatment effect and subsequent response to optional Psilocybin 25 mg re-administration(s) during the 1-year Follow-up Period.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic, recurring and potentially life-threatening illness that affects up to 10% of the population across the globe.Increasing evidence indicates a clear link between immune dysfunction and MDD.Moreover, an activation of inflammatory pathways is associated to a lack of clinical response to antidepressants. Thus, the regulation of inflammation represents a potential approach to modulate the link between the living environment and antidepressant outcome. Light therapy combined with sleep deprivation hastens recovery, with benefits that can be perceived by patients during the first week of treatment. Alteration of the sleep-wake cycle and of sleep structure are core symptoms of MDD.The aims of the present project are (i) to show that neural plasticity and the environmental context are moderating factors of the therapeutic outcome of immune modulation and (ii) to exploit their interplay to set up novel and effective therapeutic strategies for MDD.This is a observational prospective study with non-invasive add-on procedures (Magnetic Resonance without contrast). In this study, 60 patients with a depressive episode in course of MDD and treated with a chronobiological intervention including total sleep deprivation (TSD) + light therapy (LT), as performed in clinical practice, will be studied. All participants enrolled in the study will receive Treatment As Usual (TAU), i.e., pharmacotherapy, chronobiological intervention plus clinical management. Drug prescription will be performed during the clinical management sessions.The study will have a total duration of 24 months. Each subject will participate in the study for 6 months, will undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and clinical evaluation at baseline, after one week of chronobiological treatment and at 6 months follow-up.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic, recurring and potentially life-threatening illness that affects up to 10% of the population across the globe.It posits that the increase in serotonin levels induced by Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) does not affect mood per se, but enhances brain plasticity and thus amplifies the influence of the environment on the individual. Thus, SSRI treatment has not a univocal effect but, in a favorable environment, it would lead to a reduction of symptoms while in a stressful environment might lead to a worse prognosis.Such innovative view opens new perspectives on how to improve SSRI efficacy by controlling the environment. However, often it is not possible to act on the quality of the living environment because of constraints due to patient's personal history and unchangeable life circumstances. In these cases, the pharmacological modulation of the factors underlying the link between living environment and SSRI efficacy represents a novel and desirable strategy to improve treatment outcome even in patients living in adverse conditions, which are very common in depressed patients. Inflammatory levels are markedly affected by the socioeconomic status and thus by the quality of the living environment. The hypothesis of the present project is that inflammation mediates the influence of the environment on SSRI outcome.Therefore, the control of inflammatory levels is a promising strategy to improve treatment efficacy and overcome the limited SSRI efficacy, especially when administered in patients living in adverse conditions. A further hypothesis is that the influence of the environment on inflammation, in turn affecting SSRI efficacy, occurs through epigenetic modifications. Therefore, the project aims at developing a pharmaco-epigenetic approach as effective treatment for MDD. In addition, through neuroimaging investigations, it will provide important information about functional and structural brain modifications associated to SSRI efficacy in patients. Both males and females will be considered because MDD is twice as common in women than men, suggesting that different mechanisms may underlie the psychopathology in the two sexes.
The prefrontal cortex, although well established as an efficacious target for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), has recently come into favour as a therapeutic target for alcohol use disorders (AUD). Depressive symptoms are also highly prevalent in individuals with AUD. A number of cognitive and psychological processes stemming from the prefrontal cortex, a common treatment target for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), are disrupted in both MDD and AUD. The proposed study will enhance the development of theta burst stimulation (TBS) as a new intervention for AUD in the context of depressive symptoms and uses integrated TMS-EEG to identify neurophysiological targets of executive dysfunction in this disorder.
PROSPECTIVE INTERVENTION STUDY; EFFICACY OF WEB-BASED ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY
This study is open to adults between 18 and 65 with a type of depression (major depressive disorder) for whom previous treatments for depression did not work. The purpose of the study is to find out whether a medicine called BI 1569912 helps people with depression. Participants continue their standard therapy throughout the study. Participants are put into 4 groups by chance. 3 of the 4 groups take different doses of BI 1569912. 1 group takes placebo. Placebo tablets looks like BI 1569912 but do not contain any medicine. Participants take the tablets once a day for 6 weeks. Participants are in the study for about 2 to 4 and a half months. During this time, they visit the study site at least 6 times. At the visits, doctors ask participants about their symptoms. The participants answer questions about their depression symptoms. The results are compared between the groups. The doctors also regularly check the general health of participants.