Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial for Bipolar Depression

Depression Clinical Trial

— SMART-BD  

Official title:

Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial for Bipolar Depression

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06433635
• Other study ID #: 2024P000831
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: September 1, 2024
• Est. completion date: February 28, 2030

Study information

• Verified date: May 2024
• Source: Massachusetts General Hospital
• Contact: Andrew Nierenberg, M.D
• Phone: 617-724-0837
• Email: anierenberg[@]mgh.harvard.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for adults (ages > 18) with a bipolar disorder type 1 diagnosis currently experiencing a depressive episode. It is a randomized pragmatic trial that will compare four commonly prescribed treatments for bipolar depression, which includes three FDA-approved medications (Cariprazine, Quetiapine and Lurasidone) and one antipsychotic/antidepressant combination (Aripiprazole/Escitalopram).

Description:

This is a comparative effectiveness study to address the critical questions of how best to treat people with bipolar disorder who have a major depressive episode: how to get them well, provide second-line treatment when they don't initially get well, and keep them well after they get well. This is a multisite Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) comparative effectiveness design. Investigators will recruit 2726 participants who have BD with a current major depressive episode. In Stage 1, investigators will compare four treatment arms, including three FDA approved monotherapies and the most widely used, but understudied, treatment for BD major depressive episode (i.e., a non-FDA approved combination of an antipsychotic and antidepressant). In Stage 2, participants who do not remit will be re-randomized to treatments not used in Stage 1. Investigators will follow all participants for a total of 52 weeks. This study will be conducted in two phases, a feasibility phase and a full study phase. In the feasibility phase, investigators will recruit at 8 of the 19 study sites based on readiness and interest, to ensure the efficacy of the study design before launching the full study phase. Feasibility Aim 1: To ensure that 8 of the 19 selected sites can recruit, randomize, and retain participants. During the feasibility phase, the selected sites will recruit 133 participants, administer baseline assessments, randomize the participants (at baseline and again at 6-weeks for non-remitters), and conduct follow-up assessments at the end of Stage 1 (6-weeks) and the end of Stage 2 (12-weeks) and end of study (52 weeks or end of feasibility phase, whichever is sooner) and all other scheduled visits. Feasibility Aim 2: To refine and finalize all study standard operating procedures for the full-scale study. After Aim 1 is complete, any changes in standard operating procedures will be made as needed to be implemented in the full study phase. Full Scale Study Full-Scale Study Aim 1: To compare the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of the four treatments for BD major depressive episodes. Hypothesis 1a: There will be significant differences across the Stage 1 treatments in the proportion of remitters at week 6 (primary endpoint, effectiveness) and in the average adverse event burden and suicidal ideation/behavior at week 6 (secondary endpoints, tolerability and safety). Hypothesis 1b: Among non-remitters of a given Stage 1 treatment (i.e., participants who do not remit by week 6), there will be significant differences across the three remaining Stage 2 treatments in the proportion of remitters at week 12 (primary endpoint, effectiveness) and the average side effect burden and suicidal ideation/behavior at week 12 (secondary endpoints, tolerability and safety). Full-Scale Study Aim 2: To characterize the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of the 12 adaptive interventions for BD major depressive episodes embedded within the SMART design. Hypothesis 2: On average, there will be significant differences across the 12 embedded adaptive interventions in the proportion of remitters at week 12 (primary endpoint, effectiveness) and in the average side effect burden and suicidal ideation/behavior at week 12 (secondary endpoints, tolerability and safety). Full-Scale Study Aim 3: To determine individual-level characteristics that predict heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) across the 12 adaptive interventions for BD major depressive episodes embedded within the SMART design. Hypothesis 3a: Individual-level characteristics and symptoms assessed at baseline as well as symptom changes and side effect profiles at week 6 will predict HTE at weeks 12 and 52. Hypothesis 3b: Investigators hypothesize that an optimal personalized adaptive intervention will perform significantly better than the best aggregate embedded adaptive intervention identified in Aim 2 in terms of the proportion of remitters at week 12 (primary endpoint, effectiveness) and the side effect burden and suicidal ideation/behavior at week 12 (secondary endpoints, tolerability and safety).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 2726
• Est. completion date: February 28, 2030
• Est. primary completion date: February 28, 2030
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Aged between 18 years to 75 years

2. Meets criteria for DSM-V Bipolar I disorder with a history of manic episodes and current major depressive episode lasting at least 6 weeks

3. Can be managed as an outpatient and participate in the study

4. Willing to be randomized; able to perform study assessments

5. Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (e.g. oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, barrier methods, or total abstinence; Depo Provera is acceptable if it is started 3 months prior to enrollment), and inform staff of their plans to conceive.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Meets current criteria for a manic episode, rapid cycling within the past year (history of 4 or more mood episodes per year)

2. History of schizophrenia or other nonaffective psychosis

3. Current substance use disorder that will interfere with participation in the study

4. Currently taking the study medications or a history of serious adverse events to any of the study medications, to the extent that as determined by site PI, another trial would not be clinically indicated

5. A history of non-response for depressive episodes, to any of the study medications, when given at adequate doses for at least 6 weeks

6. Current acute suicidal risk that requires inpatient treatment

7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Bipolar Disorder
• Bipolar I Disorder
• Depression
• Depressive Disorder

Intervention

Drug:
• Cariprazine
Cariprazine monotherapy outperformed placebo in improving depressive symptoms in most large randomized control trials (RCT). Pooled data showed higher remission rates (30.2%) with cariprazine (1.5 mg and 3 mg/day) compared to placebo (20.9%). Its efficacy extends to bipolar I depression, including mixed features and anxiety. Common adverse effects include nausea (8%) and akathisia (7%). Somnolence and sedation were slightly more common with cariprazine than placebo. Results from a large RCT evaluating cariprazine for bipolar disorder maintenance treatment (NCT03573297) are awaited. An open-label trial reported reduced manic symptoms over 16 weeks. Cariprazine is a D3-preferring partial agonist for D3 and D2 receptors. It antagonizes 5-HT2A and 5-HT2B receptors and partially agonizes 5-HT1A receptors. Affinity for 5-HT1C and histamine 1 receptors is low to moderate.
• Aripiprazole/Escitalopram combination
40-70% of bipolar patients use antidepressants, often with antipsychotics or mood stabilizers. Aripiprazole lacks efficacy in bipolar depression but is used for mania. Escitalopram, studied alongside mood stabilizers, showed some efficacy. Aripiprazole in bipolar depression trials led to higher rates of akathisia, insomnia, nausea, fatigue, and impulse control disorders. Escitalopram's is generally safe but adverse effects include nausea, diarrhea, insomnia, dry mouth, ejaculatory dysfunction and dizziness. Aripiprazole monotherapy in bipolar I patients reduced relapse rates and delayed relapse time, but not for depressive episodes. Aripiprazole acts as a partial agonist at D2, D3, 5-HT1A, and 5-HT2C receptors, with antagonistic effects on a1 and possibly H1 receptors. Escitalopram is highly selective for the serotonin transporter, with no significant activity at other receptors.
• Quetiapine
Both immediate and extended-release quetiapine monotherapies showed superiority over placebo in acute BD depression across three 8-week randomized trials, confirmed by meta-analysis. Quetiapine exhibited significantly higher remission rates (52.8%) compared to placebo (34.7%) and improved various aspects of life, including quality of life, clinical global impression, sleep, functioning, and anxiety. Common adverse events of quetiapine include sedation, hypotension, increased appetite, weight gain, dyslipidemia, and elevated glucose levels, particularly in a population already at risk. Four studies examined quetiapine's maintenance effects in patients with manic, mixed, or depressive episodes. Overall, quetiapine prolonged the time to recurrence for both depressive and manic episodes.
• Lurasidone
Lurasidone, either alone or with lithium/valproate, proved more effective than placebo for acute BD depression in two 6-week randomized trials. Remission rates were significantly higher with lurasidone monotherapy (40.9%) and in combination (50.3%) compared to placebo (24.7% and 35.4% respectively). Lurasidone also improved anxiety, quality of life, and disability. Common mild adverse events included nausea, headache, akathisia, somnolence, sedation, dry mouth, and vomiting. Weight gain, dyslipidemia, and increased glucose levels were not observed. In a 6-month double-blind discontinuation study post-acute treatment response, lurasidone combined with lithium/valproate prolonged time to depressive episode recurrence compared to placebo (hazard ratio: 0.68). Although not statistically significant due to low placebo recurrence and shorter follow-up, it hints at maintenance efficacy.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	University of Toronto	Toronto	Ontario
Canada	University of British Columbia	Vancouver	British Columbia
United States	University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Albuquerque	Albuquerque	New Mexico
United States	University of Michigan	Ann Arbor	Michigan
United States	University of Texas at Austin	Austin	Texas
United States	John Hopkins	Baltimore	Maryland
United States	Sheppard Pratt Health System	Baltimore	Maryland
United States	McLean Hospital	Belmont	Massachusetts
United States	University of Alabama Birmingham	Birmingham	Alabama
United States	Massachusetts General Hospital	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill	Chapel Hill	North Carolina
United States	Case Western Reserve University	Cleveland	Ohio
United States	University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center	Dallas	Texas
United States	UT Health Houston Texas	Houston	Texas
United States	Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine	New York	New York
United States	New York University Grossman School of Medicine NYU	New York	New York
United States	University of Pennsylvania	Philadelphia	Pennsylvania
United States	University of Pittsburgh	Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania
United States	Mayo Clinic	Rochester	Minnesota

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Massachusetts General Hospital	Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale	self-rating mania scale designed to assess the presence and/or severity of manic symptoms in children and adolescents; The range is from 5-25, higher scores reflect increased symptoms of of mania	Investigators will administer this measure every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (weeks:0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Other	Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment	A seven-item instrument that is used to measure or assess the severity of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).; The range is from 0-21, higher scores reflect increased symptoms of of anxiety	Investigators will administer this measure every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (weeks:0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Other	Medication Reconciliation Tracking Form	The MRTF generates the average number of necessary clinical adjustments per month, which provides a method to compare long-term outcomes in a pragmatic trial.; There is no range or scoring necessary for this assessment.	Investigators will administer this measure every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (weeks:0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Other	Patient Health Questionnaire	The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression; The range is from 0-27, higher scores reflect increased symptoms of of depression	Investigators will administer this measure every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (weeks:0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Other	PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 Cognitive Functioning- Short Form	Cognitive deficits will be assessed with the PROMIS- Cognitive Function-Short Form. This 8-item self-report questionnaire has good construct validity and psychometric properties and has been used as an outcome in multiple studies.; The range is from 8-40, increased scores are associated with a person's increased perception of cognitive function in areas such as concentration, memory, and mental acuity	Investigators will administer this measure at baseline (week 0), week 6, and week 12. Then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Other	PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities	This measure is an 8 item self-report questionnaire that assesses the individual's satisfaction with social roles and activities. The measure has clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions, including depression and responds to change in clinical state; The range is from 8-40 increased scores are associated with higher feelings of satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities	Investigators will administer this measure at baseline (week 0), week 6, and week 12. Then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Other	Young Mania Rating Scale	The YMRS is a rating scale used to evaluate manic symptoms at baseline and over time in individuals with mania.; The range is from 0-60, higher scores reflect increased risk for Bipolar Disorder. If the participant scores 18 or above on the YMRS, they will be considered manic and not in remission even if they meet criteria for remission with the RDQ	Investigators can administer at any time between weeks 0 to 52. This assessment only applies if patients has a pseudo-remission from depression, indicated if the patient scores a 6 or higher on the self-rated Altman Scale for Rating Mania (ASRM)
Other	Quality of Life Scale	The QoL.BD93,94 measures 12 core domains (physical, sleep, mood, cognition, leisure, social, spirituality, finances, household, self-esteem, independence, identity) and 2 optional (work, education) domains; A brief 12-item version represents the core QoL domains and is scored on a five-point range (1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree). The range of scoring is 12-60 with higher scores reflecting a greater belief in ones quality of life.	Investigators will administer this measure at baseline (week 0), week 6, and week 12. Then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Primary	The Remission from Depression Questionnaire	RDQ is a 41 items self report questionnaire used to assess the seven domains found in extensive previous research to be important to patients: depressive symptoms, anxiety, coping ability, positive mental health, functioning, life satisfaction and a general sense of well-being. Using a score of 27 as the cutoff, the RDQ scale has a sensitivity of 83.7% and specificity of 77.9% in predicting self-reported remission status. The RDQ has excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.97 for the total scale and above 0.80 for each of the 7 subscales with test-retest reliability of the total scale = 0.85 and > 0.60 for each subscale). The primary outcome will be remission as defined by a RDQ score < 27. This test will be administered in all assessment visits.; The RDQ scale ranges from 0-27 per domain, with higher scores indicating greater remission rates.	Investigators will administer this measure every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (weeks:0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Secondary	Safety: Concise Health Risk Tracking Scale	CHRT is a 14 item self-report measure of suicidal ideation and behavior in individuals with mood disorders. The CHRT has excellent psychometric properties, with an internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.78 and a consistent factor structure with 3 independent factors (current suicidal thoughts and plans, perceived lack of social support, and hopelessness).; The range is from 14-70, higher scores reflect an increase in suicidality behaviors.	Investigators will administer this measure every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (weeks:0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Secondary	Frequency and Intensity of Side Effects Ratings - Intensity	This subscale of the FIBSER scale is a reliable self-report measure of the intensity of side effects from medications in a population receiving treatment for depression. This scale measures the participants side effects intensity from the previous week and has them rate each on a scale from 0-6. The results will help the clinician determine the appropriate level of response.; The range is from 0-6, higher scores reflect an greater intensity in medication side effects.	Investigators will administer this measure every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (weeks:0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Secondary	Frequency and Intensity of Side Effects Ratings - Frequency	This subscale of the FIBSER scale is a reliable and valid self-report measure on the frequency of medication side effects in a population receiving treatment for depression. This scale measures the participants side effects frequency from the previous week and has them rate each on a scale from 0-6. The results will help the clinician determine the appropriate level of response.; The range is from 0-6, higher scores reflect an greater frequency in medication side effects.	Investigators will administer this measure every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (weeks:0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).
Secondary	Frequency and Intensity of Side Effects Ratings - Burden	This subscale of the FIBSER scale is a reliable self-report measure of the side effects burden of medications in a population receiving treatment for depression. This scale measures the participants side effects burden from the previous week and has them rate each on a scale from 0-6. The results will help the clinician determine the appropriate level of response.; The range is from 0-6, higher scores reflect an greater burden in medication side effects.	Investigators will administer this measure every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (weeks:0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and then at each study visit during the follow up phase until they are discharged from the study (weeks:20,28,36,44,52 ).