View clinical trials related to Dental Pulp Necrosis.
Filter by:The clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of Zinc oxide- propolis versus Zinc oxide -Eugenol as obturating material in pulpectomy of non-vital primary teeth.
This study was conducted to evaluate Calcium Hydroxide mixed with Gingerols versus Metapex in treatment of primary teeth with infected necrotic pulp
The aim of this study is to clinically compare the intensity of post-operative pain and the amount of bacterial reduction after using 20mg/ml propolis nanoparticles extract solution during chemo-mechanical preparation, versus 2.5% NaOCl, in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular premolars treated in a single visit.
Evaluation of post operative pain after pulpectomy procedures for primary molars with irreversible pulp damage and without periapical radulicency using two different systems (One shape file ( ratation movemont) and wave one gold file ( reciprocation movement)
Calcium hydroxide is advocated as an intracanal medication for various purposes, including prevention of post-treatment symptoms. Calcium hydroxide has a pain-controlling effect at different times when compared to non-intracanal medication . Aim: The aim of the study to compare between postoperative pain after using two formulations of calcium hydroxide intracanal medication with and without iodoform .
Propolis is a resinous product of honeybees. Propolis is said to be effective against resistant microorganisms inside the root canal compared to the gold standard medication known as calcium hydroxide. The clinical trial tests the effect of propolis versus calcium hydroxide on pain in patients with necrotic teeth.
This randomized clinical trial intended to evaluate the efficacy of a technique of root canal treatment of deciduous molars with non-instrumentation of root canals and use of a paste containing antibiotics (chloramphenicol and tetracycline) and zinc oxide and eugenol (CTZ group). The hypothesis is that the efficacy of non-instrumentation treatment is non-inferior than the standard treatment involving manual instrumentation of root canals and filling with zinc oxide and eugenol paste (ZOE group) after 24 months of follow-up. Children will be randomly allocated to one of the two groups: CTZ group or ZOE group. In the CTZ group, after the location of root canals entrance, an initial irrigation will be conducted using 1% sodium hypochlorite. Then, CTZ paste will be placed in the pulp chamber floor, over the root canal entrances. The instrumentation of the root canals will not be performed for children allocated to this group. For the ZOE group, manual instrumentation with endodontic K files will be performed, aided by irrigation with 1% sodium hypochlorite. After the end of the instrumentation, root canals will be filled with ZOE paste. All teeth will be restored with bulk-fil resin composite. Children will be followed-up for 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the treatment. The primary endpoint will be the success of endodontic treatment evaluated by clinical and radiographic methods after 24 months. Based on a non-inferiority limit of 15% in the success rate, it was estimated an anticipated sample size of 218 (109 per group), divided among the centers. Other secondary endpoints will be clinical time spent with the treatments, children's behavior during the treatment, discomfort immediately after the end of the treatment reported by the children, post-operative pain, improvement in the negative impact of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life, costs and cost-efficacy.
This study aims to compare the effect of 2% curcumin solution versus 2.5% sodium hypochlorite as irrigating solutions in necrotic mandibular molars in terms of postoperative pain and antibacterial effect.
The study design is a randomized controlled trial and up to 120 teeth, 50 in each of the 2 groups, will be enrolled from the patients at the National University Centre for Oral Health Singapore (NUCOHS) Endodontic unit. The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of selective caries removal (SCR) and pulpotomy in preventing pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis in teeth with deep dental caries radiographically extending at least 2/3 into the width of dentine, over a review period of 6 months, 1, 3, and 5 years. The secondary aim of this study is to compare the costs (tangible i.e. restorative treatment costs, and intangible i.e. number of treatment visits and time spent at clinic to complete treatment) and tooth survival in the oral cavity, between teeth treated with SCR and pulpotomy.
3D volume assessment was done to evaluate the periapical healing following REPs in mature teeth.