View clinical trials related to Dental Implant.
Filter by:A study designed as a randomized controlled trial of parallel group design will be conducted at the Dental clinic of the University of Valencia to evaluate the influence of 2.5 mm high abutments with different shapes (commercially available high abutments vs high abutments with modified shape to imitate short abutments) on peri-implant bone loss around bone level implants with platform switching in partially edentulous patients that require a fixed rehabilitation supported by two implants in the posterior mandible or maxilla and in fixed rehabilitation supported by one implant in the anterior mandible or maxilla.
Comparison of different drilling speed to classify bone quality by tactile sensation on a saw bone model
The study aims to investigate and compare the reduction in (1) soft tissue inflammation and (2) amount of plaque accumulation at implant sites with (test) or without (control) patient administered use of single tufted brush. Stratified randomized single blinded clinical controlled trial with 2 parallel arms is designed to achieve the aims of this research project. Study participants will be enrolled from NUH University Dental Cluster. They will be randomly assigned into the test (toothbrush, interdental brush, and single tufted brush) and control (toothbrush and interdental brush) groups and reviewed at 2 weeks (± 3 days), 4 weeks (± 3 days), 3 months (± 7 days), and 6 months (± 7 days).
Placing implants in the posterior maxillary area has the drawback of working with scarce, poor quality bone in a significant percentage of cases. Numerous advanced surgical techniques have been developed to overcome the difficulties associated with these limitations. Subsequent to reports on the elevation of the maxillary sinus through the lateral approach, there were reports on the use of the crestal approach, which is less aggressive but requires a minimal amount of bone. Furthermore, it is more sensitive to operator technique, as the integrity of the sinus membrane is checked indirectly. The main advantage of this new technique, Intralift, is that it does not require a minimum amount of crestal bone (indeed, the smaller the width of the crestal bone, the better this technique is performed). The possibility of damage to the sinus membrane is minimised by using ultrasound based hydrodynamic pressure to lift it, while applying a very non-aggressive crestal approach. Conclusions: We believe that this technique is an advance in the search for less traumatic and aggressive techniques, which is the hallmark of current surgery.
This study will compare two commonly used soft tissue grafting techniques (connective tissue graft, CTG vs Acellular Dermal Matrix, ADM) to augment the soft tissue at the time of lateral ridge augmentation procedure. Following ridge augmentation procedure, most of the times there is a need for soft tissue augmentation to change the quality of the tissue around future implant's site. To our knowledge, the influence of soft tissue augmentation at the time of ridge augmentation procedure has not been tested defects.
A multicenter prospective observational study in which aim is to illustrate the clinical outcome of dental implants "Kontact N"; and the effects of its nanostructured surface on the osseointegration and secondary stability without increasing the rate of peri-implantitis. All the enrolled patients will be eligible for one or multiple implant-supported fixed restoration(s) according to the routine clinical practice and the manufacturer's instruction for use.
There is limited data regarding socket preservation in three wall defects and no enough evidence of implant placement in previously regenerated area with allograft. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to analyze and compare dimensional changes in extractions sites with buccal bone defects > 5 mm left untreated (simultaneous regeneration during implant placement) or treated using a mineralized allograft.
In the case of unitary edentulousness, a dental implant is a prosthetic device fixed in the bone which makes it possible to receive a fixed dental prosthesis (crown). Peri-implant soft tissues (gums) play an essential role in the integration of the crown. Indeed, the implant gingival emergence profile provides an aesthetic integration mimicking that of a natural tooth. This implant emergence profile (EIP) is modeled during the surgical and / or prosthetic phases. The problem comes from the labile character of the EIP (Emergence Implant Profile). If the literature evokes this problem, the instability of the volume of the EIP during the impression phases has never been measured. Moreover, the three-dimensional behavior of the EIP over time (kinetic) during the acquisition phases is not known. Objective study of the mobility of gingival tissues of the implant emergence profile (IEP), using an intra-oral optical camera, would scientifically measure the labile aspect of the IEP and improve the procedure of registration of peri-implant soft tissues
The prosthetic treatment with dental implants is challenging in posterior maxilla, where there is a sinus pneumatization. For the rehabilitation of patients with intermediate bone level, short implants have been used as alternative. It is also needed to look for the prosthetic context of rehabilitation with implants, like the use of different materials as abutments. The aim of this study is to compare the survival of two sizes of implants (short vs standard) placed in upper premolars region with need of bone graft, with a minimum of three years of follow-up, and assess the behavior of different abutments (titanium vs zirconia) in prosthesis in this context. This will be a randomized clinical trial with two groups: 1) standard implants and sinus lift; and 2) short implants without sinus lift. The patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria and accept to participate of this study, will be included in the randomization process. At the implant installation, a brown envelope, with the word SHORT or STANDARD, will be open, in order to determine the group. Abutment type will be also randomized. Four months after the installation, torque will be confirmed and the abutment will be installed. Implant failure and prosthesis failure in function of the abutment will be the outcomes. Data analysis will be conducted following a previously established spreadsheet using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test for success and survival, followed by Cox regression, if possible and according to the number of failures.
Background: Implant placement in the posterior maxilla is always troubled by the insufficient bone volume. Trans-alveolar sinus floor elevation (TSFE) has been proven a predictable surgical procedure to increase the bone height in the posterior maxilla. However, questions as the necessity of the bone grafting is necessary during the sinus lift and could the TSFE be performed when the residual bone height is below 5mm are still being debated. Besides, high-quality evidence on comparing the clinical outcome of transalveolar sinus floor elevation with osteotome and modified sinus floor elevation with crestal non-cutting drills is limited. Methods/Design: 120 adult patients who fit the inclusion criterions are being recruited from the first clinical division, School and Hospital of Peking University (Beijing, China). All the patients are assigned into four groups according a table of random numbers. Participants receive 1) TSFE using osteotomes with bone grafting; 2) TSFE using osteotomes without bone grafting; 3) modified TSFE with bone grafting; and 4) modified TSFE without bone grafting. The clinical operators will be concealed with the assignment until the beginning of surgical procedures. In a one year follow up period, implant survival rates, complications, implant stability, bone remodeling around the implant and patient-reported outcome (visual analogue scale for intraoperative discomfort and postoperative pain) are observed and documented. The implant stability is gauged by the resonance frequency analysis for 7 times (2, 4,8,12,16,26,52 weeks). And the bone remodeling is observed and compared by CT scan. Discussion: The result of the trial will support a better decision making in atrophy posterior maxilla when implant placement is needed. If favorable, the use of the modified TSFE would achieve as ideal outcome as the traditional TSFE but with less trauma and postoperative discomforts. Besides, whether the bone graft procedure is necessary for the TSFE will also be discussed.