Clinical Trials Logo

Dental Implant clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Dental Implant.

Filter by:
  • Enrolling by invitation  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05053958 Enrolling by invitation - Clinical trials for Patient Satisfaction

Using Superimposition of Intra-Oral Scan and CBCT in Single Implant Restorations in Aesthetic Zone.

Start date: September 7, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study will be performed to evaluate patients'satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes of single implant restorations in aesthetic zone by using superimposition of intra-oral scan and CBCT.

NCT ID: NCT04544839 Enrolling by invitation - Dental Implant Clinical Trials

Clinical Evaluation of Two Different Attachment System

ADLCvsLOC
Start date: November 2, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Edentulous patients commonly experience a deterioration in the quality of life; both in terms of oral and general health. Studies demonstrated that conventional dentures do not adequately restore masticatory function nor quality of life. In contrast, implant-supported overdentures are considered the standard of care for edentulous patients as they offer a more stable prosthesis that ultimately results in improved oral function and patient satisfaction. Precision attachments such as studs, magnets, telescopic crowns or a bars are commonly used for implant supported overdentures. Implant overdentures supported by stud attachments gained popularity for the rehabilitation of edentulous patients as they are self-aligning, offer dual retention and compensate for divergence between implants up to angles of 40 degrees. However, it has been documented that the stud attachment system (Locators) requires a high frequency of maintenance, particularly with regard to the replacement of the matrix. In order to overcome some of these limitations of existing attachment systems, a newer system was developed consisting of a matrix made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) instead of a polymeric material. This system has an amorphous diamond like carbon-based abutment coating (ADLC) and it was claimed to be more resistant to wear. Clinically and in vitro, no comparative studies have been performed addressing wear and retention of the traditional stud attachment and the newer ADLC attachment. Thus, the aim of the present study is to clinically and in vitro evaluate the ADLC and study attachment system.