View clinical trials related to Dental Implant.
Filter by:Assessing whether is there a difference between computer-guided ridge splitting and conventional technique with simultaneous implant placement in patients with maxillary width deficiency.
The dental implant placed freehand with a digital planing is vastly increasing. The accuracy between the planned and the placed implants still not well determined. Between a single implant and a full mouth rehabilitation, the precision is very wide. A precision scale must be settled according to each indication in order to offer the clinician a safety and a predictability for his procedures.
The aim of the present prospective study was to investigate after a 2-year of follow-up any influence of the surgical technique, manual or digitally guided, on peri-implant marginal bone levels stability in implants placed 1 mm sub-crestally. Patients were treated by means of platform-switched implants provided with a 5 degrees internal conical connection and supporting single screw-retained fixed crowns. Marginal bone level (MBL) measured at prosthesis installation (t0) at 1 (t1), 2 (t2) and at 3 years of follow-up visit (t3) were considered. MBL change from t0 to t3 was investigated. The distance between the implant neck and the first radiographically detected bone to implant contact was considered to evaluate the bone loss. Two groups were considered: Test Group (GD) for implant sites treated with a digitally guided surgery procedure. Control Group (FH) for implants surgically placed without digitally guided surgery, respectively. All the procedures were performed by an experienced operator. Additionally, for both groups MBL changes were correlated to different supra-crestal soft tissue height (STH) amounts: less than 3 and ≥ 3 millimeters, respectively. Peri-implant soft tissue parameters such as probing depth (PPD), modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI) and modified Plaque Index (mPI), were assessed for all the restorations included.
This study's goal is to evaluate the efficacy of traditional rehabilitation with freehand implant implantation of partly or totally edentulous patients utilizing flapless or mini-flap procedures vs. 3D implant design software and specialized surgical templates.
Objective: To assess the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of early loaded implants with a hydrophilic, moderately rough surface for partially edentulous patients after a follow-up of 8.5 to 9.5 years. Materials and methods: A prospective observational single-centre study involving 15 patients with single, delayed placement and early loaded implants in the posterior area was performed. Clinical and radiographical parameters, including biological and technical complications and patient satisfaction, were assessed.
The purpose of this study is to present a guided lateral window sinus lift (GLSL) procedure with the aid of a fully digital workflow using surgical templates for window osteotomy preparation and implant placement.
Objective: The aim of this case series study is to present the rationality and scientific evidence of a new design for a Double and Triple abutment with their specific new concept of Biodynamic Optimized Peri-implant Tissue (BOPiT). Methods: The innovative design of these abutments with a paraboloid geometry was based on BOPiT, simultaneously involving the principles of mechanobiology, biotensegrity, and mechanotransduction. Thus, individuals rehabilitated with different extents of edentulous spaces using the innovative double and triple abutments on osseointegrated dental implants are included in this case series. The double and triple abutments support 2 or 3 dental crowns on a single implant, respectively. Clinic and radiographic examinations are presented at T1 (loading after 4 months of the implant insertion surgeries with the appropriate metalloceramic prostheses) and T2 [final examination with a follow-up time ≥ 3 to 12 years (average of 7.2 years)].
The aim of this study is to evaluate the transcrestal sinus lift using Osseodensification versus lateral window technique with simultaneous implant placement.
A triple function scan Body were done on healed dental implant, thus simplifying the workflow for full arch cases and reducing the number of visits to only 3 visits. In this technique, scan bodies were utilized for implant position scanning, facial scan alignment and as stoppers for jaw relation capturing as scan bodies were used as stoppers for jaw relation registration.
The aim was to compare two protocols for immediate implants with fixed provisional restoration, no grafting (trimodal approach=TA) versus grafting both osseous gap and peri-implant mucosa (trimodal approach with modification of the osseous and mucosal compartments =TAOM) by measuring the soft tissue changes overtime. The periodontal phenotype was registered, to investigate a relationship between its thickness and the clinical outcomes.