View clinical trials related to Dental Implant.
Filter by:Vertical bone height reduction after extraction in the posterior maxilla is inevitable and complicates the treatment plan. Crestal sinus elevation, using implants and different grafting procedures are considered some of the proposed treatment protocols. Ever since the introduction of implant dentistry and implant placement in the posterior maxilla has been a dilemma. The choice of the type of bone, anatomical landmarks and reduced remaining bone height are all obstacles faced when placing implants in this area. Vertical bone height reduction occurs post extraction of the maxillary molars and premolars by maxillary sinus pneumatization. Many protocols were suggested to overcome this phenomenon; placing short implants, 2nd premolar occlusion and finally maxillary sinus elevation. A recent systematic review evaluated osteotomes mediated sinus floor elevation with or without grafting material. It concluded a high long term survival rate in both procedures, however only one comparative study was used in the analysis that involved 12 participants only. Another systematic review assessed the survival of implants placed with lateral versus crestal sinus approach in 4-8 mm ridge height. It concluded that the ability of the less invasive crestal sinus approach to replace one-stage lateral approach, however, only one randomized control trial was presented that involved 4o patients, and were followed-up for 5 years. This emphasizes the gap of knowledge in literature with high quality evidence concerning these approaches. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the radiographic vertical gain in bone height as well as the implant stability after implant placement without the use of bone grafts in posterior maxilla following sinus elevation using the crestal implant approach technique.
The aim of this pioneer study was to evaluate the efficacy (heart rate value, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, cortisol levels, BIS monitoring, patients' anxiety) of Mindfulness Meditation as a sedative technique during dental implant surgery.
The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate clinical performance of combined tooth-implant supported 3 unit fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible and was to compare and evaluate them with the complications of 3 unit fixed partial dentures supported with free standing dental implants.The main question[s] it aims to answer are: 1.Is there any difference in terms of mechanical and biological complications as well as marginal bone level between free standing and combined tooth-implant supported 3 unit Fixed Partial Dentures in posterior mandible. Participants will receive either 2 dental implants(Control group) or 1 standart length dental implants to be combine with abutment tooth or 1 short dental implant to be combine with abutment tooth for supporting 3 unit fixed partial dentures.
Introduction: the repeated connection and disconnection of healing abutments during dental implants´ osseointegration has been associated with significant increased peri-implant bone loss, when compared with placing the final prosthetic abutment during implant placement surgery and non-removing it ever again. Previous data from animal studies suggests that the higher the number of removals of the healing abutments, the greater the bone resorption around implants, however the evidence in humans is scarce and heterogeneous. Furthermore, this greater bone resorption has been claimed to be associated to the inflammatory status of the peri-implant soft tissues, which would be greater as a consequence of the repeated disruption of the soft-tissues attachment to the prosthetic abutment, and the hypothetical microbial contamination of the implant-abutment interphase, induced by the repeated manipulation of the prosthetic components. Objective: to evaluate the changes in peri-implant crestal bone levels between two prosthetic protocols, the control being the conventional protocol where healing abutments are placed during surgery and removed four times before the delivery of the final abutment and prostheses, and the test protocol where definitive abutments are placed immediately after implant placement and are not removed ever again. Material and methods: 80 platform switched implants will be placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible of 40 partial edentulous patients. Immediately after implant placement, patients will be randomized to receive the definitive abutment at the moment of implant placement (one abutment-one time protocol), or 12 weeks later, after removing the healing abutment four times during the confection of the final prostheses, following the conventional protocol for implant supported restorations. The day of prostheses delivery, a mucosal biopsy from the implant surrounding tissues will be taken for histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses of the inflammatory response of the peri-implant soft tissues. Radiographic assessment of vertical bone level changes (primary outcome), clinical status of peri-implant tissues, changes in soft tissues margin, patient related outcomes and adverse events will be assessed at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after loading.
In this clinical trial the effect of the implant-abutment morphology (platform-switched vs platform matched) will be assessed in both soft tissue (soft tissue thickness) and hard tissue (marginal bone loss) outcomes. Several clinical predictors (initial implant position level, gingival biotype, abutment height and prosthetic emergence profile) will also be taken into account as modulating factors of the clinical outcome.
Rationale: Early implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using either a collagen matrix or a palatal graft rendered similar esthetic, clinical and PROMs to early implant placement without ARP, up to 1 year after functional loading. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate esthetic and clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla in patients treated with a xenograft and a collagen matrix or a free connective tissue graft versus spontaneous healing 5 years after loading Study design: prospective observational study with 5-year follow-up Intervention (if applicable): not applicable Main study parameters/endpoints: Comparison of the level of the buccal marginal gingiva (midfacial mucosa level) between ARP versus spontaneous healing Secondary parameters/endpoint: Peri-implant esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic score (WES), complications, implant survival; and success, Plaque Index, Modified bleeding index, Gingival Index, Probing Depth, PROMs, bone and soft tissue volumetric dimensional changes.
The goal of this clinical trial to test the effect of periimplant soft tissue phenotype in the participants with implant placed and at least 1 year after implant loading. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is keratinized mucosal thickness (KMT) important in early marginal bone loss and peri implant health? 2. Is keratinized gingival width (KGW) important in early marginal bone loss and and peri implant health? The researchers plan to include 80 implants in the study. These 80 implants will be divided into 2 groups in 2 different ways according to their KMT and KGW on their buccal surfaces: KMT ≥2 mm are included in the adequate KMT, and those with KMT<2 mm are in the insufficient KMT group. Those with KGW≥2 mm are adequate KGW, those with KGW<2 mm are adequate KGW. The researchers will assess marginal bone loss around the implant using radiographs and collect peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) using paper strips. Another researchers will measure the Receptor Activator Of Nuclear Factor-Kappa B Ligand (RANKL), Osteoprotegerin (OPG), Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α), MicroRNA-223 (MiRNA-223), MicroRNA-27a (MiRNA-27a) levels in the collected PICF. They will compare radiographic bone loss and biomarker levels in groups.
The aim of this study will be to compare the amount of marginal bone height changes between immediate and delayed loading for immediately inserted implants used as abutments of mandibular overdenture.
After jaw resection, free vascularized bone flaps are frequently used for repairing maxillofacial defects. Simultaneous dental implantation is more preferable to secondary implantation as it saves the patients from going through a second surgery after recovering from the first one. In this study, the aim is to preliminarily evaluate the clinical outcome of simultaneous dental implants in vascularized bone flaps in jaw reconstruction using patient-specific surgical plates and 3-in-1-PSSG. The objectives of this study were: 1) to investigate the intraoperative success rate; 2) to measure the accuracy of dental implants position; and 3) to assess implant survival rate and postoperative adverse events.
The aim of the present study is to compare the rate of new bone formation after sinus floor elevation with or without perforation of the cortical sinus floor prior to insertion of augmentation material. Twelve patients requiring bilateral sinus floor elevation will be recruited for a pilot study in split-mouth design. On both sides a lateral window will be prepared and the sinus mucosa will be elevated. After this step, the sides are assigned as test or control side. While the control side is just filled with augmentation material, an additional step is performed for the test side, i.e., prior to inserting the augmentation material, the cortical bone layer of the sinus floor is perforated several times into the trabecular bone layer to improve the blood supply to the grafting material. Thereafter, both sides are left to healing for 4-6 months until implant installation. At timepoint of implant installation, a bone biopsy will be collected to allow histological assessment of the grafted area.