Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Terminated
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04368000 |
Other study ID # |
IRB_00132123 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Terminated |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 29, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
August 6, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2020 |
Source |
University of Utah |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major complication among patients with severe
disease. In a report of 138 patients with COVID-19, 20% developed ARDS at a median of 8 days
after the onset of symptoms, with 12.3% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation.
Efficacious therapies are desperately needed. Supportive care combined with intermittent
prone positioning may improve outcomes.
Prone positioning (PP) of patients with severe ARDS (when combined with other lung-protective
ventilation strategies) is associated with a significant mortality benefit. In addition, PP
for >12 hours in severe ARDS is strongly recommended by clinical practice guidelines. The aim
of this study is to compare the outcomes of prone positioning versus usual care positioning
in non-intubated patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
Description:
In December 2019, an outbreak of a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in Wuhan, China and
rapidly spread worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a
pandemic on March 11th, 2020. The clinical disease (COVID-19) is mild in 81% of patients,
severe disease occurs in 14%, and 5% of cases result in critical illness. The reported
overall case fatality rate (CFR) is 2.3% in China, although the CFR varies widely (0.7- 7.2%)
between regions. Older age is associate with increased mortality. The reported CFR is 8%
among patients 70-79 years old and 15% in those 80 years and older.
Multiple therapies have been proposed based on in vitro evidence or anecdotal reports.
Although, no high quality clinical trials have demonstrated an effective treatment regimen
other than supportive care. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major
complication among patients with severe disease. In a report of 138 patients with COVID-19,
20% developed ARDS at a median of 8 days after the onset of symptoms, with 12.3% of patients
requiring mechanical ventilation. Efficacious therapies are desperately needed. Supportive
care combined with intermittent prone positioning may improve outcomes.
Prone positioning (PP) of patients with severe ARDS (when combined with other lung-protective
ventilation strategies) is associated with a significant mortality benefit. In addition, PP
for >12 hours in severe ARDS is strongly recommended by clinical practice guidelines.
Improvements in gas exchange, cardiac output, and clearance of secretions have been
demonstrated with PP, and are thought to contribute to the survival benefits. Low quality
evidence from case series and retrospective studies in awake, spontaneously breathing
patients suggest PP is feasible, improves oxygenation, and may avoid the need for mechanical
ventilation. A recent prospective observational study of early PP combined with high-flow
nasal cannula or non-invasive mechanical ventilation was well tolerated and may help patients
avoid intubation.
This study is a single-center non-blinded randomized controlled pragmatic feasibility study
comparing the outcomes of prone positioning (intervention) versus usual care (control) in
non-intubated patients hospitalized for COVID-19.