There are about 3576 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in South Africa. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study will compare community-delivered, multi-month dispensing of tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) to standard-of-care clinic-based TPT delivery in a population of South African adults who are recommended to receive TB preventive therapy. We hypothesize that persons receiving multi-month dispensing of TPT in the community will have a higher rate of TPT completion at 3 months than persons receiving TPT via standard of care with monthly clinic-based refills.
This is a parallel, double blind, Phase 3, 2-arm study that is designed to provide additional safety information, assess the durability of treatment response, and provide additional PK and immunogenicity assessments. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and tolerability of both itepekimab SC Q2W or itepekimab SC Q4W in participants with COPD having completed the treatment period of the clinical studies EFC16750 or EFC16819. A secondary purpose of this study is to provide efficacy outcomes beyond the treatment period of the parent trials EFC16750 and EFC16819. Study details include: - The study duration will be up to 72 weeks - The treatment duration will be up to 52 weeks - A follow-up period of 20 weeks will be conducted - The number of on-site visits will be 7 and the number of phone contacts will be 5
This is a parallel group, Phase 3, multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm monotherapy study for treatment of participants diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD), whose disease is not adequately controlled with topical prescription therapies or when those therapies are not advisable. The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of treatment with amlitelimab solution for SC injection compared with placebo in participants with moderate to severe AD aged 12 years and older. Study details include: At the end of the treatment period, participants will have an option to enter a separate study: the blinded extension study EFC17600 (ESTUARY). For participants not entering the blinded extension Study EFC17600 (ESTUARY), the study duration will be up to 44 weeks including a 2 to 4-week screening, a 24-week randomized double-blind period, and a 16-week safety follow-up. For participants entering the blinded extension Study EFC17600 (ESTUARY), the study duration will be up to 28 weeks including a 2 to 4-week screening and a 24-week randomized double-blind period. The total treatment duration will be up to 24 weeks. The total number of visits will be up to 10 visits (or 9 visits for those entering the blinded extension study EFC17600 (ESTUARY).
The overall goal is to determine whether an end-to-end decentralized delivery service for PrEP is more effective, safe, acceptable, and cost-effective than facility-based PrEP delivery.
This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and the effect of 2 mg Baxdrostat vs. placebo, administered QD orally, on the reduction of SBP, measured by average 24-hour ABPM in 212 participants with rHTN (defined as seated SBP ≥ 140 mmHg at Screening and mean ambulatory SBP ≥ 130 mmHg at baseline, despite a stable regimen of ≥ 3 antihypertensive agents, one of which is a diuretic).
This research study is being conducted to find out how easy, comfortable, and safe intravaginal rings are for women to use. The two rings used in this study do not dispense any medications, are the same size, but differ in their flexibility and hardness. This study will enroll approximately 100 HIV-negative persons, aged18-45 years, and assigned female sex at birth from sites in the United States, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. Participants will be randomly assigned to use (self-insert) Ring A for 4 weeks and then Ring B for 4 weeks or Ring B first followed by Ring A. There will be a 1-3-week rest period between using the two different rings. The study involves answering questions, undergoing pelvic examinations, and collecting blood and vaginal fluid samples over a total of 7 in-person visits and 2 telephone calls over approximately 9-11 weeks. In addition, both participants and approximately 30 of their sexual partners will be asked to take part in in-depth interviews to further assess acceptability, attitudes, and experiences with ring use to gauge interest in the future use of intravaginal rings as a HIV prevention option.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the reactogenicity, safety, and immunogenicity of an investigational respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, mRNA-1345, in pregnant women, and safety and immunogenicity in infants born to vaccinated mothers.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate safety and biologic effect of a multi-strain vaginal L. crispatus live biotherapeutic product (LBP) in people receiving antibiotic treatment for bacterial vaginosis (BV). The main question[s] it aims to answer are whether the intervention is safe, and whether the strains of L. crispatus will colonize recipients' vagina. The study will evaluate one LBP with 6 strains of L. crispatus (LC106) and one LBP with 15 strains (LC115) vs. placebo. Participants will: - be treated with oral antibiotics for BV - receive 7 days of vaginal study product - collect daily home swabs and make short daily diary entries for 5 weeks, including the week of antibiotic treatment and the week of study product treatment. Researchers will compare the 3 groups receiving different dosing strategies of LC106 and 1 group receiving LC115 vs. 1 group receiving placebo to see if the live biotherapeutic strains colonize the vagina after antibiotic treatment for BV.
Extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) accounts for nearly 30% of TB cases in HIV endemic settings, such as South Africa. The diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB is complicated by the poor performance of Gene Xpert and TB Culture in extrapulmonary fluid (30-50% sensitive), as well as the poor specificity of ADA. We can therefore not reliably use these tests to diagnose EPTB as effectively as we use them in sputum samples. The current best practice for diagnosing pleural TB is to perform a pleural biopsy, which is both invasive and costly. A rapid, easy to use test is needed to allow accurate and fast diagnosis of EPTB. Interferon-gamma is released at high concentrations in extrapulmonary fluid in active EPTB. Antrum Biotech has developed the IRISA-TB assay (validated and SAHPRA licenced) for the diagnosis of EPTB. The study will assess the real-world performance of IRISA-TB compared to ADA, Gene Xpert, and TB Culture when used to diagnose EPTB. We will evaluate IRISA-TB's performance in the following patient groups: - Suspected TB pleural effusion (n= 650) - Suspected TB pericardial effusion (n= 280) - Suspected TB peritonitis (n= 200) - Suspected TB meningitis (n = 1040) As part of our evaluation, we will ask clinicians who treat these patients to provide their feedback on IRISA-TB. We will ask them to indicate to what extent the IRISA-TB test helped them to make treatment decisions. Finally, we will conduct an economic assessment to determine the true cost of diagnosing and treating EPTB to the health system and patients, and we will determine how IRISA-TB could potentially result in cost savings.
The UNITE4TB consortium is a group of universities and pharmaceutical companies funded by the European Union. This consortium are carrying out a trial to find better and faster ways to treat tuberculosis (TB). The standard treatment for TB takes 24 weeks and uses four drugs. The consortium want to find new treatments that are faster but just as safe and effective. In the trial, two new drugs will be used, BTZ-043 and GSK3036656, along with the drugs that are already used to treat TB in a variety of combinations (11 different combinations initially). These new drugs have worked well in tests with animals and have reduced the amount of TB bacteria in people's sputum/phlegm when used alone for two weeks. These new drugs will be used in combination with other TB drugs for a longer time (up to 16 weeks) in people with TB. The UNITE4TB consortium want to see if they work well and are safe. This trial will take place at sites across the world and will involve people with TB of the lungs that would usually respond well to the standard treatment. But the new treatments being tested might also work for people with drug resistant TB, that's harder to treat. The trial has two parts. In the first part, different combinations of drugs will be tried on up to 700 people for 16 weeks. These combinations will be compared to the standard 24-week treatment to see which ones work the best and are safe. In the second part, the best combinations from the first part will be taken to try to find out what the best length of time is to give the treatment for. These combinations will be tried on up to 1800 people giving them either 8, 10, 12, 14 or 16 weeks treatment. The investigators will follow these people for a total of 72 weeks to make sure the treatment is working. The UNITE4TB consortium hope that this trial will find new treatments that are fast, safe, and effective for both regular TB and resistant TB. If it works, it can then be tested again in a bigger trial to be sure.