There are about 2500 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Ukraine. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy in patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH).
The CASI-Plus mHealth intervention seeks to improve partner elicitation and testing as part of assisted partner services (APS) in Ukraine, through a mHealth client engagement tool using computer-assisted self-interview (CASI). APS is a strategy for contact tracing and HIV testing for the high-risk sexual and needle-sharing partners of patients known to be living with HIV. This implementation science research will provide useful evidence on whether CASI-Plus can improve partner elicitation and HIV testing in a routine APS program operating at scale, toward the ultimate goal of linkage to HIV prevention and treatment services among those at highest risk of HIV. The aims are: 1. Aim 1 (R21): Conduct formative research from health worker and client perspectives to design the CASI-Plus mHealth intervention. 2. Aim 2 (R21): In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), assess adoption of CASI-Plus and its impact on contact elicitation. 3. Aim 3 (R33): In an expanded RCT, test CASI-Plus on the HIV testing index. 4. Aim 4 (R33): Assess appropriateness and feasibility of the CASI-Plus intervention and its impact on overall acceptability of APS services. Participants will integrate CASI-Plus as part of the APS services workflow to collect information from clients on sexual partners, needle-sharing partners, and biological children with risk of HIV exposure, and on self-reported partner notification and partner HIV testing outcomes. The investigators will compare APS clients using CASI-Plus to APS clients receiving standard APS services, to see if the contact index (number of partners named per index client enrolled in APS services) and the HIV testing index (number of partners with unknown HIV status tested per index client enrolled in APS services) increase with use of CASI-Plus.
The aim of this study is to pilot a peer education for people on medication assisted treatment (MAT). People on MAT will be trained to be peer educators and provide outreach to the educators social network members who inject drugs, some of whom will be HIV positive.
COVID-19 can trigger a dysregulated immune response, and previous studies have shown that immune modulation can improve outcomes in hospitalized patients. This trial is designed to determine whether intensification of immune modulation early in the course of the disease (while patients are on low flow oxygen) with abatacept (active arm) combined with standard of care (SOC) improves recovery as compared with placebo + SOC (placebo arm). For both groups, intensification of immunomodulation will be provided as part of SOC in case of signs of disease progression (patient requires high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or more support) and/or if the patient has rapidly increasing oxygen requirement.
The goal of this clinical trial is to study the preliminary effectiveness of a data to care intervention versus standard of care for people living with HIV in Ukraine. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does a data to care strategy improve primary outcomes of HIV care engagement, antiretroviral therapy initiation or re-initiation, and viral suppression among not-in-care people living with HIV? - Does a data to care strategy improve secondary outcomes of engagement or re-engagement in ancillary services (e.g., drug treatment) and quality of life?
Since February 24th, 2022, the beginning of Russia's aggression against Ukraine, more than 80,000 women were expected to give birth. Therefore, understanding the impact of war on the perinatal health of women is an important requisite to improve perinatal care.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib compared to investigator's choice of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide plus rituximab (FCR) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in participants with previously untreated CLL/SLL without 17p deletion and/or tumor protein (TP) 53 mutation. The primary hypothesis is that nemtabrutinib is superior to FCR/BR with respect to progression-free survival (PFS).
Treatments are needed to improve outcomes among patients hospitalized for COVID-19, including direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents to mitigate the pathology driven by ongoing viral replication. This trial will evaluate S-217622 (ensitrelvir), an anti-SARS-CoV2 3C-like protease inhibitor (PI) developed by Shionogi &; Co. Ltd. The study design is a randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center international clinical trial that will evaluate the clinical efficacy of ensitrelvir when given in addition to standard of care (SOC) for inpatients with COVID-19. The SOC will be determined by local established guidelines and may include additional DAA (e.g., remdesivir) and immunomodulatory treatment strategies. Certain SOC treatments will be pre-specified prior to randomization.
This study compares semaglutide, together with a lower dose of insulin glargine, to a higher dose of insulin glargine in participants with type 2 diabetes. The study looks at how well the study medicines control blood glucose levels. Participants will either get semaglutide together with a lower dose of insulin glargine or a higher dose of insulin glargine. The study will last for about 47 weeks (approximately 11 months). Participants will have 9 clinic visits, 15 phone/video calls and 1 home visit. Participants will be asked to wear a sensor that measures their blood sugar all the time in 2 periods of 10 days during the study.
The primary objective is to characterize the efficacy TEV-48574 in adult participants with IBD (moderate to severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or Crohn's Disease (CD)) as assessed by induction of clinical remission (UC) and endoscopic response (CD) at week 14. Secondary objectives: - To evaluate the efficacy and dose response of the 2 different dose regimens as assessed by multiple standard measures - To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the 2 different dose regimens - To evaluate the immunogenicity of the 2 different dose regimens The study will consist of a screening period of up to 6 weeks (42 days), a 14-week treatment period, and a 4-week follow-up period.