Clinical Trials Logo

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page [1] ·  Next »
NCT ID: NCT06356129 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Large B-cell Lymphoma

Study to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of Golcadomide Plus R-CHOP vs Placebo Plus R-CHOP in Participants With Previously Untreated High-risk Large B-cell Lymphoma

GOLSEEK-1
Start date: June 24, 2024
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of golcadomide in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy vs placebo in combination with R-CHOP chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated high-risk large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL).

NCT ID: NCT06346171 Not yet recruiting - Procedural Pain Clinical Trials

VR Augmented Human Delivered Integrative Psychotherapy for Colonoscopy Procedural Anxiety and Pain

VRIPanx-COL
Start date: April 28, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Colonoscopy is an invaluable tool for the diagnosis and management of colon diseases, especially colorectal cancer (CRC) - the third most common cancer worldwide. Its unmatched ability to detect CRC and premalignant growths makes it the gold standard; however, it is not without its challenges. Patients often experience pre-procedure anxiety and discomfort primarily related to anticipated pain, which negatively impacts both the procedure and its outcomes. Colonoscopy procedural anxiety not only exacerbates the experience of pain, but also may compromise the quality of bowel preparation, augment procedure and recovery room times, and increase the use of sedation, particularly among females, who report greater pre-procedural anxiety, and perceive the procedure to be more painful and harder to endure. This underscores the importance of interventions aimed at mitigating anxiety to improve patient experience and adherence to colonoscopy procedures. The profound positive corelation between anxiety and pain impact on outcomes of colonoscopy warrants an investigation of comprehensive patient care strategies. A growing body of evidence indicates that non-pharmacologic interventions, such as music therapy and immersive virtual reality (iVR), may effectively reduce anxiety, pain, and enhance overall patient satisfaction. Understanding barriers to colonoscopy compliance, such as fear of cancer diagnosis, the perception of invasiveness, and feelings of embarrassment is paramount to enhancing CRC screening uptake, therefore lowering mortality.

NCT ID: NCT06307652 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Heart Failure and Impaired Kidney Function

Study to Evaluate the Effect of Balcinrenone/Dapagliflozin in Patients With Heart Failure and Impaired Kidney Function

BalanceD-HF
Start date: April 12, 2024
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This is a Phase III, international, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, double-dummy, active-controlled, event-driven study in patients with chronic HF and impaired kidney function who had a recent HF event. The aim is to evaluate the effect of balcinrenone/dapagliflozin vs dapagliflozin, given once daily on top of other classes of SoC, on CV death and HF events.

NCT ID: NCT06299618 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Environmental Influence on Mental Illness Via Modifications of Genomes and Metabolomes in Adolescents With Autism

ENIGMA-I
Start date: April 2024
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim of the study is to enrich the understanding of the physiological mechanisms that predispose autistic adolescents to mental illness. It will inform a possible pathway and biomarker handprint of mental illness severity and prognosis to formulate a neurobiologically informed personalization strategy that could be applied for selecting appropriate Evidence Based Intervention (EBI) for treating an adolescent formally diagnosed with Autism.

NCT ID: NCT06283836 Not yet recruiting - Otosclerosis Clinical Trials

Dexmedetomidine vs. Remifentanil Conscious Sedation for Stapedotomy/Stapedectomy

Start date: March 1, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Dexmedetomidine continuous intravenous infusion vs. remifentanil target-controlled infusion conscious sedation for stapedotomy/stapedectomy- a prospective, single-center, double-masked randomized trial The goal of this clinical trial is to compare monitored anesthesia care with continuous intravenous dexmedetomidine vs. remifentanil target-controlled infusion in patients undergoing stapedotomy or stapedectomy for otosclerosis. The aims of this research are: - to assess the patient's satisfaction with each sedation regimen - the surgeon will also grade their satisfaction regarding the surgical field The investigators will monitor and analyze the vitals during and after the intervention and document any intra- and postoperative complications. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either dexmedetomidine or remifentanil, and the patient, the surgeon, and the investigator will not be aware of the treatment administered.

NCT ID: NCT06268873 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Chronic Kidney Disease and Hypertension

A Phase III Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Baxdrostat in Combination With Dapagliflozin on CKD Progression in Participants With CKD and High Blood Pressure.

Start date: March 29, 2024
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of baxdrostat/dapagliflozin in participants ≥ 18 years of age with CKD and HTN. This study consists of a screening, a 4-week dapagliflozin run-in period for participants naïve to SGLT2i at baseline; a 24-month double-blind period in which participants will receive either baxdrostat/dapagliflozin or dapagliflozin; and a 6-week open-label period in which all participants will discontinue baxdrostat/placebo and receive dapagliflozin alone. Site visits will take place at 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16- weeks following randomisation. Thereafter visits will occur approximately every 4 months, until the 24-month visit at which time baxdrostat/placebo will be discontinued. Participants will continue open-label dapagliflozin for another 6-weeks (approximately), where reassessment of GFR will occur for the primary efficacy endpoint. In the event of premature discontinuation of blinded study intervention, participants will continue in the study and receive open-label dapagliflozin monotherapy, unless the participant meets dapagliflozin specific discontinuation criteria, in which case all study interventions will be discontinued.

NCT ID: NCT06256588 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Neoplasms, Head and Neck

A Study of Dostarlimab vs Placebo After Chemoradiation in Adult Participants With Locally Advanced Unresected Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

JADE
Start date: March 4, 2024
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of Dostarlimab compared to Placebo in adult participants with HNSCC (Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma)

NCT ID: NCT06232707 Not yet recruiting - Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Alnuctamab Compared to Standard of Care Regimens in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

ALUMMINATE
Start date: March 29, 2024
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alnuctamab compared to standard of care regimens in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

NCT ID: NCT06231082 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Liver Disease Parenchymal

Bloody or Well Done. How Would You Like Your Liver Biopsy, Sir?

LIMPID
Start date: January 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a randomized comparative trial between percutaneous liver biopsy and EUS FNB guided liver biopsy in patients with parenchymal liver disease. Studies so far have been shown that EUS FNB guided liver biopsy is non inferior to percutaneous liver biopsy in terms of efficacy, provided several conditions are met (type of needle, wet suction, actuations). În terms of safety, it may be that EUS FNB have an advantage, as needle diameter is slightly smaller, needle is inserted under better visualisation especially in patients with large subcutaneous fat tissue and the possibility of examining the needle tract and plugging it with needle content if needed ("the blood patch technique"). However, although severe, the incidence of liver bleeding is low, so a comparative trial with the hypothesis that EUS FNB has fewer liver bleedings than percutaneous techniques would have a very large sample size. A recent study found out that abdominal pain at 2 hours after procedure is predictive for liver bleeding. So we have design a randomized prospective trial assuming that EUS FNB guided liver biopsy has significantly less abdominal pain at 2 hours after procedure when compared to percutaneous route, using abdominal pain at 2 hours as a surrogate marker for risk of liver bleeding.

NCT ID: NCT06217744 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Mental Health Wellness 1

Mental Health Literacy and Academic Performance

MHLAP
Start date: May 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of an intervention designed to promote mental health literacy in adolescents. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Whether this intervention can have an impact on mental health 2. Whether this intervention can have an impact on fostering academic performance, particularly in disadvantaged students (i.e., academic resilience) 3. Whether this intervention will have differential effectiveness as a function of the delivery format (psychoeducational materials only versus blended) Participants will receive either an online, automated intervention consisting of psychoeducational materials delivered at predetermined intervals (automated), or the same but with the addition of synchronous or asynchronous psychoeducational sessions held by a licensed psychologist (i.e., blended). These two conditions will also be compared to a Waitlist, to test if the interventions perform better than no treatment.