There are about 2274 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Romania. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The objectives of this study are to demonstrate the equivalence of Xlucane to Lucentis® in treatment of subjects with wet (ie, neovascular) age-related macular degeneration (wAMD).
Obesity interventions in early childhood are recommended as they have been proven to be more effective than interventions later in life. The overall aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptance of an overweight and obesity intervention in socially disadvantaged families. Participants will be families with children aged 2-6 years (n = 300) with overweight or obesity and will be recruited from three sites: Stockholm, Sweden (n = 100); Timisoara, Romania (n = 100); and Mallorca, Spain (n = 100).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tislelizumab as first line treatment in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced unresectable/metastatic ESCC.
This is a randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab or placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line (1L) therapy for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.
Randomized controlled trial to measure pain experience, side effects and satisfaction of VR following varicose vein, hernia repair and gallbladder surgeries.
This is a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, global Phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of Durvalumab plus Olaparib combination therapy compared with Durvalumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy in patients whose disease has not progressed following Standard of Care (SoC) platinum-based chemotherapy with Durvalumab as first-line treatment in patients with Stage IV non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumors that lack activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions.
FIBRO-RISK study aims to investigate the impact of inflammatory-mediated myocardial fibrosis on the risk of recurrence after successful ablation of atrial fibrillation. The level of systemic inflammation in the pre-ablation and immediate post-ablation period will be assessed on the basis of serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers (hs-CRP, matrix metalloproteases, interleukin-6), while the level of cardiac fibrosis will be determined based on MRI imaging associated with complex post-processing techniques for mapping myocardial fibrosis at the level of left atrium and left ventricle. At the same time, the amount of epicardial fat will serve as an indirect marker of localized inflammation and will be determined at different levels in the heart (surrounding left atrium, right atrium or the entire heart), while ventricular function will be assessed on the basis of serum levels of NT pro-BNP prior to the procedure. All these parameters will be investigated in patients with successful ablation of AF, who will be divided into 2 groups: group 1 - patients who develop AF recurrence at 1-year, and group 2 - patients with no recurrence of AF at 1-year. In all patients, the following biomarkers will be determined: serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers and NT-proBNP at 24 hours and 1 year post-procedure, the amount of myocardial fibrosis at the level of left atrium and left ventricle at baseline +/- 7 days and the amount of epicardial fat surrounding left atrium, right atrium and the entire heart at baseline +/- 7 days. The primary endpoint of the study will be represented by the rate of AF recurrence at 1-year post ablation, documented by either ECG or Holter monitoring. The secondary endpoints of the study will be: - rate of re-hospitalization - rate of survival without relapse - rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE rate, including cardiovascular death or stroke)
The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 4 doses of cenerimod versus placebo in adult subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
This study will compare the clinical activity of novel immune-oncology agents (in combination or as single agents) to standard of care in participants with relapsed/refractory advanced NSCLC. The study will initially evaluate two treatment regimens/arms. Additional regimens/arms may be added via future protocol amendment(s). Participants will be stratified by histology (squamous vs. non-squamous) and line of anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD[L]1) therapy (first vs. second line). Initially, the study will evaluate the GSK3359609 inducible T-cell co-stimulator (ICOS) agonist in combination with SoC docetaxel compared to docetaxel alone (sub-study 1). SoC arm will be the common comparison arm across all sub-studies. At study start, subjects will be randomized to the study at a ratio of 1:2 to Arm 1 (docetaxel) and Arm 2 (ICOS agonist + docetaxel). The study will consist of three periods: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-Up. There will be approximately 105 participants enrolled in the study initially. Treatment will continue for approximately 2 years and participants will be followed for survival during the follow-up period.
This is a Phase III randomised, double-blind, multi-centre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in combination with standard of care platinum based chemotherapy and bevacizumab followed by maintenance durvalumab and bevacizumab or durvalumab, bevacizumab and olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.