There are about 1249 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Philippines. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a Phase III open-label study to assess if camizestrant improves outcomes compared to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer with intermediate-high or high risk for disease recurrence who completed definitive locoregional therapy (with or without chemotherapy). The planned duration of treatment in either arm within the study will be 7 years.
The Strong Families Programme was introduced by UNODC in the Philippines in 2018 through the training of facilitators. Twenty-six participants trained in the program from different cities and municipalities. Afterward, Caloocan, Marikina, Palawan, Pasig, and Quezon City Local Government Units (LGUs) started to train more facilitators to allow them to pilot the program in their communities. Eventually, these cities and municipalities managed to engage families to benefit from the Strong Families Programme. The current study aims to explore the feasibility, effectiveness and acceptability of this universal prevention program with families in the Philippines, and the feasibility of delivering the program. The primary objective will be to test the effectiveness of the Strong Families program in improving family skills outcomes and caregiver and child mental health, as reported by caregivers, when implemented in the Philippines. The secondary objective will be to calculate the extent of family's attendance of Strong Families sessions, to evaluate completeness of program delivery. The tertiary objective will be to explore the cultural and contextual acceptability of the Strong Families program for families in the Philippines. A two-arm feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial with two arms: 1) Implementation of Strong Families (Intervention Group) and 2) Wait list/Control (Services-as-usual). This trial will have an embedded process evaluation. This study will take place in five locations in the Philippines. The implementation usually happens at the Barangay Level (The smallest administrative division in the Philippines and is the native Filipino term for a village, district, or ward)
Every year, more than 3 million people with TB remain undiagnosed and 1 million die. Better diagnostics are essential to reducing the enormous burden of TB worldwide. The Assessing Diagnostics At Point-of-care for Tuberculosis (ADAPT) study seeks to reduce the burden of TB worldwide by evaluating faster, simpler, and less expensive TB triage and diagnostic tests.
The purpose of this study is to assess the immunogenicity and safety of SCB-2023 trivalent vaccine compared to the prototype SCB-2019 monovalent vaccine in participants previously vaccinated with 3 doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine ≥6 months prior to enrollment.
This is an open-label trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of treatment with BEM + RZR in subjects with chronic HCV infection.
This Phase 1, randomized, observer-blind, dose-ranging clinical study is evaluating 6 different formulations of MF59-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted H2N3 influenza vaccine. Approximately 600 healthy adult subjects are to be randomized into 1 of 6 possible treatment groups with 100 subjects per group, stratified by age group (born after or before 1968). Each subject will receive an influenza vaccine injection on Day 1 and Day 22. Subjects will be followed up for approximately 12 months after the second vaccine injection. The primary immunogenicity analysis is based on the Day 1, Day 8, Day 22, Day 29, and Day 43 serology data. The primary safety analysis is based on solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) reported within 10 days after each vaccination, unsolicited AEs reported within 3 weeks after each vaccination, and serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), AEs leading to withdrawal from the study, and AEs of special interest (AESIs) reported throughout the study.
This study is open to adults with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called spesolimab helps people with HS. People who have previously taken specific medicines such as immunosuppressive biologics other than Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors cannot take part. This study has 2 parts. In Part 1, participants are divided into 4 groups of almost equal size. 3 groups get different doses of spesolimab, 1 group gets placebo. All participants get injections into a vein or under the skin. Placebo injections look like spesolimab injections, but do not contain any medicine. Every participant has an equal chance of being in each group. In the beginning, participants get the study medicine every week and later every 2 weeks. After 4 months, participants in the placebo group switch to spesolimab treatment. In Part 2, participants are divided into 2 groups. One group gets a suitable dose of spesolimab that was found in Part 1 of the study. The other group gets placebo. After 4 months, participants in the placebo group switch to spesolimab treatment. Participants join only one of the two parts. They are in the study for about 1 year. During this time, they visit the study site in the beginning every week and later every 2 weeks. Some of the visits can be done at the participant's home instead of the study site. The doctors regularly check participants' HS symptoms. The results are compared between the groups to see whether spesolimab works. The doctors also regularly check participants' general health and take note of any unwanted effects.
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AZD2693 given by subcutaneous injection in adult participants with non-cirrhotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with fibrosis and who are carriers of the PNPLA3 148M Risk Allele
This study will explore the different factors associated with drug response to acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor (donepezil) and NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) in patients with Alzheimer's Disease.
Nonadherence to fluid restriction is a significant issue among hemodialysis patients globally, with numerous adverse health outcomes. These outcomes include increased intradialytic weight gain, acid-base and electrolyte imbalances, and decreased mental health. This study aimed to determine the effects of a fluid distribution timetable on adherence to fluid restriction among patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis. The study utilized a single-blind, randomized-controlled efficacy trial design. Selected ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis are then randomized using computer-generated sequences of randomly permuted blocks stratified according to sex to receive the intervention or the control group. Adherence to fluid restriction was measured using the dialysis thirst inventory and intradialytic weight gain. The variables were computed using One-way Repeated Measures Multivariate Analysis of Variance and Multivariate Analysis of Covariance. Secondary outcomes included baseline patient demographic profile and was compared according to group allocation. Both group were followed up for four weeks, assessing the outcome measures during the third hemodialysis session for each week