There are about 5161 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Norway. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The aim of this study is to develop a teaching material built on the Five Ways to Wellbeing and investigate its effects on wellbeing and mental health among school pupils aged 10 to 16 years in Moss municipality, Norway. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How do participating pupils, teachers, and other school personnel experience the teaching material - is it acceptable and experienced as useful? 2. What are the immediate and long-term effects of the teaching material on the pupils' wellbeing and mental health? 3. For whom is the teaching material effective, and what mechanisms may explain potential improvements in wellbeing after exposure to the teaching material? Pupils will be given a teaching program at school, delivered by their teacher. Participating pupils and their teachers will be invited to complete questionnaires. Some teachers, school leaders, school health nurses, and parents will be invited to share their experiences with the teaching material in focus group discussions.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the treatment effects of an integrated treatment called Family-based and Metacognitive therapy for patients with Anorexia Nervosa. In addition, we will evaluate if an active follow-up of the patients will reduce the number of relapses, which is common during the 1 year after discharge. Fifty patients aged 12-18 years old and their parents will be invited to participate in this study and all will receive the same treatment but be randomly allocated to different follow-up conditions. The active follow-up includes 3 sessions of Metacognitive therapy and the passive follow-up includes ordinary follow-up, with no booster sessions. The patients will be assessed at baseline, pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 6 and 12 months follow-up.
This is a phase 3, randomized, open-label study of opevesostat compared to alternative abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with respect to overall survival (OS) and to radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG) Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in participants with mCRPC previously treated with next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) and taxane-based chemotherapy. It is hypothesized that opevesostat is superior with respect to OS and rPFS per PCWG Modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR in androgen receptor ligand binding domain (AR LBD) mutation-negative and -positive participants.
The primary objectives of this study are to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan to Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC) with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1), as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR), and overall survival (OS). The primary hypotheses are that sacituzumab tirumotecan is superior to TPC with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by BICR, and that sacituzumab tirumotecan is superior to TPC with respect to OS.
HRO350 contains an oil-based extract from herring roe (Clupea harengus) in soft capsules and contains phospholipids (complex lipids) which are naturally rich in marine polyunsaturated fatty acids. All the lipids in HRO350 are natural components of the human diet. It is not fully known how HRO350 exerts its effects, however there are indications that it might have a modulatory effect on the inflammatory processes involved in causing psoriasis. The study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, dose finding, multi-centre, phase 2B study. Approximately 519 patients will be participating in the UK, Norway, Germany, Finland and Poland. Patients will receive either 1050mg or 2100mg HRO0350 daily, or placebo for up to 52 weeks and will be followed up for a further 8 weeks.
The goal of the RESTART RCT is to examine whether a complex lifestyle intervention, coordinated with municipal and non-government organizations (NGO), can establish and preserve improvements in risk factors and functional capacity among older adults at high risk of cardiometabolic disease. The main objectives to investigate are whether a complex lifestyle intervention, compared to an active control group, will at 24 months have: 1. Produced a clinically relevant increase in cardiorespiratory fitness (primary endpoint) 2. Increased muscle strength, physical activity and reduced adiposity 3. Improved body composition, health-related quality of life and cognitive function All participants (Control and Intervention Groups) are provided with wrist-worn activity trackers at baseline and access to national recommendations on physical activity. The intervention group additionally advances through a comprehensive lifestyle program including high-intensity aerobic and strength exercise, dietary and behavioral counselling. Intervention participants are gradually transitioned into exercise activities organized by Tromsø Municipaity and local NGO:s. Testing of outcomes are performed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Primary endpoint (VO2max) is assessed at 24 months.
The overall objective of the REBECCA studies at Stavanger University Hospital (SUH) is to improve the QoL of patients affected by cancer-related fatigue during and after end of treatment, by collecting multi-source real world data (RWD) and intervening based on the collected RWD. In the intervention study, REBECCA-2, the investigators will use the collected real world data to provide a personalised follow-up to the breast cancer patients in order to improve their quality of life. The patients in this study are randomised into 2 groups after end of primary treatment: - The control group (n=55): Patients will receive standard follow-up according to national guidelines plus 3 generic lifestyle consultation sessions via telephone. - The experimental REBECCA group (n=55): Patients will, in addition to receiving standard follow-up also receive REBECCA-assisted follow-up. Data will be collected from a REBECCA smartwatch, plug-in and PROMs. If the REBECCA system detects signs of deterioration in patients' QoL during the study period, the intervention will include changes in medication given, dietary advice, referral to a psychologist/psychiatrist and/or personal training with a physiotherapist at 'Pusterommet' (SUH) After 12 months of RWD collection participants will be offered the option to continue in the study for another 6 months. For patients in the experimental Rebecca group this includes the use of the REBECCA system for another 6 months. In the clinical REBECCA-2 study, patients' visits are planned every 6 months and include collection of both PROMs and biological samples.
The purpose of this study is to assess if adding LY3537982 in combination with standard of care anti-cancer drugs is more effective than standard of care in participants with untreated advanced NSCLC. NSCLC must have a change in a gene called KRAS G12C. Study participation, including follow-up, could last up to 3 years, depending on how you and your lung cancer are doing.
The aim of this work is to identify whether the digital treatment program Mage-tarmskolen has an effect on patients with IBS. Our secondary objectives is to address multiple aspects of digital treatmtent success of the different modules. The patients will be randomized to one of four arms and will be delivered different kinds of digital treatment. All patients will have access to ask questions to a registered dietitian. Primary end point is the proportion of patients with treatment success in the low FODMAP, behavioral therapy or both groups, versus the patient education group (sham). Treatment effect is defined as an improvement of 50 points or more on the IBS severity scoring system at 3 months after treatment start compared to the score before treatment.
The aim of this feasibility study is to investigate whether a full scale RCT on the efficacy of a mobile app for risk reduction on type 2 diabetes can be conducted in the way it is planned or whether it needs to be modified. This will be investigated through a feasibility study (small scale RCT) on the efficacy of mobile technology on risk reduction of type 2 diabetes.