There are about 5241 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Hungary. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alnuctamab compared to standard of care regimens in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
This study compares the medicines semaglutide with empagliflozin or metformin in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. This study will look mainly at how well participant's blood sugar and body weight are controlled when they are taking the study medicines. Participants will either get semaglutide tablets, empagliflozin tablets or metformin tablets. Which treatment participants will get is decided by chance. Currently, doses of 3 milligram (mg), 7 mg and 14 mg semaglutide tablets (Rybelsus) can be prescribed in some countries. 25 mg and 50 mg semaglutide tablets are new doses. 10 mg and 25 mg empagliflozin tablets (Jardiance) can be prescribed in some countries. 500 mg metformin tablets (STADA) can be prescribed in some countries. Participants will get 1 to 4 tablets per day for 104 weeks. The study will last for about 2 years and 7 weeks (111 weeks). Participants should not have been treated for weight management 90 days before screening or never been treated with any medicine for type 2 diabetes (except diabetes during pregnancy) before screening. Women cannot take part if pregnant, breast-feeding or plan to get pregnant during the study period.
This is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous (IV) ganaxolone versus placebo co-administered with IV antiepileptic drug (AED) according to standard of care for the treatment of RSE. Approximately 70 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ganaxolone IV solution or placebo IV solution along with standard of care (SOC) IV AED.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a significant burden worldwide. In addition to lifestyle intervention, heat therapy has been shown to be effective in improving glycemic control. To date, there are no randomized, controlled trials investigating the efficacy of heat therapy in T2DM. Our aim is to investigate whether heat therapy with natural mineral water can improve blood glucose status in T2DM patients. The HEATED study is a two-arm, randomized, controlled study. Patients with T2DM were randomly assigned to Group A (bath in 38 ° C natural thermal mineral water) or Group B (bath in thermoneutral water - 30-32 ° C). Both groups participate in up to five interventions per week, representing 50 to 60 heat therapies over the 12-week study. Each intervention lasts 30 minutes, preceded by a medical examination.
Primary Objective: • To compare the immunogenicity of Gan & Lee Insulin Lispro Injection and EU-authorized Humalog following treatment in adult subjects with T1DM Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate the safety of Gan & Lee Insulin Lispro Injection in comparison with that of EU authorized Humalog following treatment in adult subjects with T1DM - To evaluate the efficacy of Gan & Lee Insulin Lispro Injection in comparison with that of EU authorized Humalog following treatment in adult subjects with T1DM
According to the anatomical proximity of the heart temporarily elevated intrathoracic pressures may have direct and indirect effects on the cardiovascular system. Undesirable hemodynamic effects of a recruitment maneuver primarily arise from the transiently increased airway pressure, manifesting in decreased right heart filling, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, a drop in left ventricular systolic transmural pressure, right and left heart ventricular interactions and subsequent changes in cardiac index. These effects can be more pronounced in patients suffering from ARDS, a condition commonly accompanied by hemodynamic instability. The complex pathophysiological changes account for why routine intensive care monitoring, such as invasive arterial blood pressure or central venous pressure monitoring is insufficient to follow hemodynamic changes under recruitment maneuver. Previous studies by the same research team confirmed that the alveolar recruitment maneuver improves oxygenation in patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure under pressure supported ventilation. Following recruitment maneuver, arterial oxygenation increased in 74 % of all patients. However, there is lack of information regarding the actual degree of changes in transpulmonary pressure and the consequent hemodynamic alterations. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate precisely the transpulmonary pressure changes during recruitment in patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure ventilated in pressure support mode following insertion of a balloon-catheter into the esophagus. In the meantime, hemodynamic changes are monitored by PiCCO and transthoracic echocardiography, and lung field aeration by electric impedance tomography.
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CUSA-081 in the restoration of central venous access device (CVAD) functionality in participants 12 years and older.
This is a multi-center prospective, single-arm, non-randomized, open label study to assess safety and performance of the Xeltis Pulmonary Valved Conduit in subjects requiring Right Ventricular Outflow Tract correction or reconstruction due to congenital heart malformations.
1. Summary of Clinical Investigation A summary of the clinical investigation is provided below and includes the primary objective of the study, the safety and feasibility endpoints, the number of subjects to be enrolled, the study duration, the subject follow-up and the inclusion/exclusion criteria. 1. Primary Objective The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the alfapump® System indication for use in the management of fluid in NYHA Class III and ambulatory NYHA Class IV heart failure patients who have an eGFR of > 15 to < 60 mL/min/1.73m2. 2. Study Endpoints 1. Primary Safety Endpoint The primary safety endpoint will be an assessment of the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) related to: 1. Surgical implant of the alfapump® 2. Device malfunctions 3. Dialysate infusion 2. Secondary Safety Endpoints The secondary endpoint will be an assessment of: 1. Time to first hospitalization related to fluid management after the activation of the alfapump® System and initiation of dialysate infusion has occurred 2. Rate of occurrence of re-hospitalizations related to fluid management 3. All-cause mortality 3. Assessment of Feasibility for Fluid Management in Heart Failure Indication The feasibility of the alfapump® System for management of fluid in NYHA Class III and ambulatory NYHA Class IV heart failure patients with renal dysfunction will be assessed by the net fluid balance as measured by the ability of the alfapump® System to move more fluid to the bladder than dialysate instilled.
The purpose of study is to test the effect of an experimental medication GED-0301(mongersen) and evaluate its safety in patients (≥ 12 years of age) with active Crohn's disease. The study will test GED-0301 compare to placebo for 12 weeks. The study treatment is blinded which means that patients and the study doctor will not know which treatment has been assigned. Patients in this study will be allowed treatment with stable doses of oral aminosalicylates, oral corticosteroids, immunosupressants and antibiotics for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Adolescent patients will also be allowed treatment with stable doses of exclusive enteral nutrition and growth hormone. All patients who complete the study will have the option to enter a long term active treatment study.