There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
An initial small study on 15 children that are already being investigated for central sleep apnoea in the sleep unit at Sheffield Children's Hospital. The central apnoea monitor will be placed around the child's abdomen overnight alongside the sensors already being used for the clinical sleep study and the signals from the two systems will be compared to evaluate the accuracy of the new device.
The goal of this exploratory observational study is to assess the feasibility and real-world clinical impact of implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for the detection of acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE) in patients who undergo Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA). The main questions that this study aims to answer are: [Question 1] What is the real-world impact of AI on the clinical outcomes and decision making by radiologists and clinicians in the management of acute PE? [Question 2] Is AI software for the detection of acute PE acceptable to use in clinical practice and do they have a favourable impact on clinical workload? [Question 3] Is it cost-effective to implement AI software for the detection of acute PE in clinical practice? Patients having a CTPA for the detection of acute PE will have their imaging analysed by AI software in combination with a human radiologist. Researchers will aim to compare the clinical and radiology specific outcomes with a retrospective cohort of patients who have had standard routine radiology reporting.
This Phase 1 clinical trial will assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a solid capsule form of NTP42:KVA4 in male and female healthy volunteers. In a randomised, 3-way cross-over study, the Trial will involve 3 dose sessions where all volunteers will receive 3 single doses of NTP42:KVA4. In two of the dose sessions, volunteers will be fasted where, in one, they will be given the NTP42:KVA4 capsule and, in another, they will be given NTP42:KVA4 in oral liquid form. To test the effect of food on drug absorption (PK), the volunteers will also be given the NTP42:KVA4 capsule after eating a full breakfast.
Dental caries remains a significant health problem in England, effecting 11% of 3-year-olds and 23% of 5-year- olds. Children with dental caries suffer pain, infection and poor oral health-related quality of life. There are different approaches for the management of childhood dental caries but it remains the most common reason for a hospital admission in the UK for children aged 5-9 years, costing the NHS £50 million in 2015-2016. While current approaches have been extensively investigated, their ability to: 1) control pain and infection; 2) prevent hospital admissions, and 3) be implemented within the current NHS contractual arrangements, remains unsatisfactory. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is an alternative and non-invasive approach that is applied topically (simple to manage for children) and has proven efficacy in arresting caries progression in primary teeth, principally from studies conducted outside Europe. Its use in primary dental care practice in the UK is limited despite acknowledged need. However, the clinical and cost effectiveness of SDF has not been compared to usual care in the UK, so it is unknown which treatment is more effective. Before a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) can be conducted into the clinical and cost effectiveness of SDF compared to usual care, there are several uncertainties related to recruitment, retention and fidelity that require investigation in a feasibility study. Research Question Is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to usual care for the treatment of caries in children's primary teeth feasible in UK primary dental care? Aim The overall aim is to establish whether conducting a RCT to compare SDF to usual care for the treatment of caries in children's primary teeth is feasible. Methods This mixed-method study is a feasibility study with an embedded process evaluation, to compare SDF with usual treatment in primary dental care in the UK. It will be individually randomised, with at least eight dentists, each in a different dental practice and a sample size of 80 participants. There will be ten participants per dentist and equal arm allocation. Follow-up will be for one year. The study will inform whether an RCT is feasible by resolving several key uncertainties. Acceptability and implementation of SDF and the research processes will be explored. Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) representatives will be involved throughout, further informing design including recruitment/retention strategies, participant documentation, analysis, engagement and dissemination.
This study is researching an experimental drug called odronextamab, referred to as study drug, when used in combination with chemotherapy. The study is focused on patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that have not been treated before (called "previously untreated"), have come back after treatment (called "relapsed"), or have not responded to treatment (called "refractory"). This study will be made up of Part 1a, Part 1b, and Part 2.The aim of Part 1a and Part 1b of the study is to see how safe and tolerable the study drug in combination with chemotherapy is and to determine the dose and schedule of the study drug to be combined with chemotherapy in Part 2 of the study. The aim of Part 2 of the study is to see how effective the combination of the study drug with chemotherapy is in comparison with the combination of rituximab and chemotherapy, the current standard of care treatment approved for Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Standard of care means the usual medication expected and used when receiving treatment for a condition. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: - What side effects may happen from taking the study drug when combined with chemotherapy - How much study drug is in your blood at different times - Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the drug less effective or could lead to side effects) - The impact from the study drug on your quality of life and ability to complete routine daily activities
This pilot investigation will recruit people with Long COVID to participate in a 4 week individualized inspiratory muscle training intervention with pre and post spirometry testing and additional functional outcomes to assess the effectiveness of the intervention.
This study is researching an experimental drug called odronextamab, referred to as study drug. The study is focused on participants with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma or NHL). This study will be made up of two parts: Part 1 (non-randomized) and Part 2 (randomized - controlled). The aim of Part 1 of the study is to see how safe and tolerable the study drug is. The aim of Part 2 of the study is to see how the study drug works compared to rituximab and chemotherapy (the current standard of care for NHL). Standard of care means the usual medication expected and used when receiving treatment for a condition. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: - What side effects may happen from taking the study drug - How much study drug is in your blood at different times - Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the drug less effective or could lead to side effects) - The impact from the study drug on your quality of life and ability to complete routine daily activities.
Depression is a debilitating chronic illness affecting 1 in 6 adults in the United Kingdom (UK) at any one time. Antidepressants and psychological therapy are the main treatments, but some people do not respond to these. Neurons and signals in the brain are greatly disrupted in people with severe depression. A ketogenic diet, a high-fat and very low-carbohydrate diet, supplies a form of energy that appears to help brain cells communicate and may improve the treatment of depression. Our goal is to find out whether a ketogenic diet could be an additional effective treatment for patients with depression for which antidepressants do not work. Using social media advertising, 100 patients, ages 18-65, who have previously tried at least two different antidepressant medications within the current depressive episode will be recruited. Enrolment, consent, and data collection will be collected online using self-report questionnaires. Participants will be allocated by minimisation 1:1 to the KD group or control group based on depressive severity (moderately severe vs. severe) and body mass index (<30kg/m2 vs. 30+ kg/m2). The intervention group will receive 6-weeks of prepared ketogenic diet meals (3 meals with snacks per day) and weekly ketogenic diet-focused nutrition counselling. The control group will be asked to follow a diet to reduce their saturated fat intake and increase vegetable consumption by one portion a day. The control group will receive vouchers to assist with purchases and will be provided with weekly nutritional counselling. Existing treatment for depression will remain in both groups. The primary outcome is the change in depression symptoms at six weeks. All participants will complete assessments of depression and anxiety every two weeks, starting before treatment to post-intervention (week 6), and again at week 12. Additional outcomes include participants' ability to experience pleasure, quality of life, ability to socialise and work, cognitive processing, morning cortisol, and gut microbiome. At all stages of the study, adults with lived experience of depression will advise the research team to take into account the needs and views of patients. This study will provide evidence of whether following a ketogenic diet leads to a short-term improvement in depression in people whose depression cannot be relieved by antidepressants.
The study is prospective, sequential, single group, and interventional but not invasive. The primary objective is to evaluate the leakage performance of the investigational medical devices (absorbing hygiene products, AHPs) compared to reference AHPs currently being used by the subjects. The study is cross-over and subjects will act as their own control, using their regular device during a 10-day period and comparing this to use of investigational device for 10 days with an initial 3-5 day transition period. In total the subjects participate in the study for about 30 days. The sequence of device use is randomized. The target population are subjects who are suffering from urinary incontinence and are current users of AHPs to manage the incontinence. Subjects are care dependent and being cared for in a care home. The study is conducted at multiple care homes in the United Kingdom. The investigational device is a new type of AHP developed to be more sustainable with a disposable insert placed into a reusable pant. The leakage performance will be tracked by collecting used AHPs and assess the occurrence of leakages and urine content. The number of leakages during the intervention period will be compared to that of the reference period. As secondary outcomes safety, changes in skin condition and caregiver and subject product satisfaction is assessed. In total 42 subjects are planned for the study.
This study is using a new technology of combining MRI and ultrasound images to help guide the injection into the correct muscles. Combining MRI images with real-time ultrasound images is a new technology which has recently become available. Sometimes ultrasound images can be difficult to interpret, especially when there are problems with stiffness in the muscles. The MRI images create a "road-map" to help understand the ultrasound images at the time of the injection. This may help guide the injection, compared with using ultrasound alone. This technique has not currently been used in muscle injections, therefore we would like to use it as part of a research study. This study is comparing current standard practice of using ultrasound guidance alone versus ultrasound guidance with an MRI road-map to direct muscle Botox injections.