There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
MAGNETO is a single-centre, non-randomised, open label Phase I clinical trial of an Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product (ATIMP) in children and teenagers aged 1-16 years with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma. The study will assess the feasibility of generating the ATIMP (GD2 CAR T cells) and the safety of administering the ATIMP in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma.
This study is open to adults with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. The study is in people with advanced cancer that had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and are eligible to receive topotecan treatment. The purpose of this study is to find out the highest dose of BI 764532 that people can tolerate when taken together with topotecan. BI 764532 is an antibody-like molecule that may help the immune system fight cancer. Participants get BI 764532 and topotecan as infusions into a vein. As an alternative, topotecan may also be taken orally (tablets). Participants may continue to take BI 764532 as long as they benefit from treatment and can tolerate it. During this time, participants visit the study site regularly. The visits also depend on the response to the treatment. At the study visits, the doctors check the health of the participants, take necessary laboratory tests, and note any health problems that could have been caused by the study treatment.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of 24 weeks of lebrikizumab in improving disease severity, signs, and symptoms in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).
The goal of this prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial is to determine if addition of awake prone positioning to standard oxygen, high flow oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation may reduce the rates of endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
This is a dose-escalation, Phase I/II trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the investigational RNA-based multivalent vaccine candidate BNT166a for active immunization against monkeypox (mpox). This trial will start with the two substudies, i.e., substudy A (SSA) and substudy B (SSB). This trial will be initiated with the dose-escalation SSA. In substudy A and substudy B, dosing will start with an initial sentinel group, followed by the expansion cohort. This study was initially planned to investigate two vaccine candidates (the quadrivalent BNT166a and the trivalent BNT166c). The sponsor decided to not activate the groups with BNT166c.
This is a Phase 2/3, multi-arm, multi-stage, open-label study of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01 negative participants with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) who will be randomized to receive either IDE196 + crizotinib or investigator's choice of treatment (pembrolizumab, ipilimumab + nivolumab, or dacarbazine).
Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition characterised by a gradual reduction in kidney function and structure over time. CKD is a risk factor for other morbidity, where it not only increases the likelihood of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, but also can have a detrimental impact on quality of life. Whilst several systematic reviews have demonstrated the benefits of interventions delivered by pharmacists, there is significant variability in terms of the outcomes reported and an inconsistency with the measures used (e.g., medication adherence is often assessed using different outcome measures). The large heterogeneity of outcomes reported and the measures used in randomised controlled trials investigating the impact interventions involving pharmacists have on CKD patients makes it difficult to interpret findings and make comparisons between interventions have. This ultimately affects the quality of research and limits the ability to synthesize evidence, particularly in meta-analyses. Issues around inconsistent outcome reporting could be addressed with the development and application of agreed standardised sets of outcomes. Indeed, the significant range of outcomes in the CKD pharmacy literature led the authors in Raiisi et al., to state that further research is required to establish a core outcome set (COS) in CKD, in relation to pharmacy practice. COS are a collection of outcomes that are standardised and agreed upon, in which as a minimum, they should be measured and reported in all trials for a particular clinical topic. They are of importance as input is provided from a variety of stakeholders such as patients, researchers, family members, carers, and healthcare professionals, in which relevant outcomes are more likely to be identified, as well as helping reduce reporting bias and heterogeneity in the research literature. Currently no pharmacy-specific COS exists for interventions conducted in CKD. Aims The overall objective is to develop a COS for clinical trials evaluating the efficacy or effectiveness of pharmacist-led interventions (i.e., interventions provided to patients are either pharmacist-led or involve their input) in people with CKD. The aim of Phase 1 is to conduct an online survey to explore outcomes of importance to stakeholders. The outcomes identified in Phase 1 will lead into a subsequent Delphi process to develop a COS (Phase 2). Methods Phase 1 The investigators aim to use an online survey to collect data from participants. The questions in this survey can be found in the attached documentation. It is estimated that this survey will take 10 minutes to complete. The first part of the survey asks questions about the participant including what stakeholder group best describes them. The second part asks them about what outcomes are important in pharmacy research and in the management of kidney disease. Phase 2 The outcomes generated in this survey will be supplemented by outcomes identified in an ongoing systematic review performed by the research group. The investigators will take this long-list of outcomes and aim to reach a consensus on a COS using a 2-round Delphi process. The Delphi process is a structured process used for forming a consensus, where stakeholder groups provide their opinions in an iterative approach for answering questions over several rounds. This will also take place using surveys online and the investigators will submit an ethical amendment for each round with the questions and outcomes we will be seeking consensus on. In each Delphi round, participants will be asked to rate the importance of outcomes for inclusion or exclusion. Between each round, excluded outcomes will be removed. Included outcomes (those reaching consensus, defined as a minimum of 75% of participants who scored outcomes as agree or strongly agree or disagree or strongly disagree) will go into the COS. Following the Delphi survey, the investigators will conduct a consensus day. A sample of participants will be invited to discuss the findings and reach a consensus on the final COS.
People living with Parkinson's (PwP) rank balance problems amongst the most disabling symptom. Over time, balance function continues to decline and PwP go on to fall, affecting between 45-68% of PwP. Falling directly impacts upon the individuals' quality of life (QoL), as it prevents patients from doing everyday activities, and places PwP at greater risk of other medical problems, such as fractures. New treatments are urgently needed to improve balance and reduce falls in order to improve QoL for PwP. The aim of this project is to achieve these goals by using exercise to alter brain activity. Supporting our idea, are previous studies that show both exercise alone as well as changing brain activity at rest via visual feedback (similar to how breathing can be controlled to lower blood pressure), can be used to rehabilitate balance. Here researchers test the idea that better results can be achieved for PwP, if a specific exercise program is used as the feedback to change brain activity. PwP will be assigned randomly into 2 groups, one receiving the exergaming physical therapy (PT) alone with a placebo feedback and, the second group will be required to change brain activity using exercise feedback to change brain activity. Each intervention will be performed 3 times/week with each session lasting 1⁄2 an hour, for 12 consecutive weeks. Participants are expected to attend 5 sessions over each fortnight. Assessments of balance will be made before and after all three treatments. This will allow us to measure any improvements and compare the 2 different methods to see which one improves balance the most in PwP.
The purpose of this study is to measure the long-term safety and tolerability of ianalumab in participants with Sjogrens syndrome who have previously completed treatment from one of two NEPTUNUS 1 year core studies (CVAY736A2301 or CVAY736A2302). - The study treatment is ianalumab 300 mg in a 2 mL pre-filled syringe for injection. All participants will receive ianalumab either monthly or every 3 months. - The treatment duration will be 3 years with an additional up to 2-year safety follow-up. The total duration of this extension study will be up to 5 years. - The visit frequency will be monthly during both the treatment period and mandatory follow-up, and then less frequently during the subsequent conditional follow-up Treatment of interest: The randomized treatment (ianalumab) will be received monthly or every 3 months. Participants assigned to treatment every 3 months will receive placebo every month between the ianalumab doses to maintain blinding. Number of Participants: Approximately 600 participants from the NEPTUNUS core studies will be rolled over into the extension study. Treatment Groups:There will be no screening period in this trial. From Week 48 of the NEPTUNUS core study, participants will be given the opportunity to consent to this extension study. From Week 52 of the NEPTUNUS core studies (i.e., Day 1 in the extension study), eligible participants will be assigned to either one of the treatment regimens: - ianalumab 300 mg monthly or - ianalumab 300 mg once every 3 months Participants receiving placebo in either of the NEPTUNUS core studies will be randomized 1:1 to receive ianalumab 300 mg monthly or every 3 months starting from Week 60 and participants receiving ianalumab in either of the NEPTUNUS core studies will continue the same treatment in the extension study. Ianalumab will be given as a subcutaneous injection from a 2 mL pre-filled syringe. Participants will be given the opportunity to self-inject at home on some visits after receiving training.
A phase 1/2 study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity of GTAEXS617-001 in patients with advanced solid tumors.