There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The main purpose of this study is to learn more about the safety and efficacy of investigational tirzepatide doses in participants with Type 2 diabetes and obesity that are already taking metformin. The study will last for about 89 weeks.
This is a study developing a prehabilitation intervention and then testing the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. Start date Aug 2022 for Focus groups and Feb 2023 Co-design workshops and feasibility study date pending
The overall aim of this trial is to compare functional and patient-reported outcomes and to assess the safety and effectiveness and long-term performance of the Smith+Nephew Robotic Systems for Unicompartmental Knee Replacements to non-robotic, conventionally implanted Unicompartmental Knee Replacements.
The study aims to retrospectively, and anonymously analyse the data of patients treated over a period of 12 months. These are the patients whose radiotherapy plan were needed to be reviewed in the weekly on-treatment head and neck multi-professional radiotherapy meeting during the course of their radiation. Collected clinical data will be included in the retrospective analysis, comparing the clinical decision (gold standard of care), against the predictive capability of intelligence software
1 in 7 infants born in the United Kingdom will require treatment on a Neonatal unit to treat conditions, which vary in there level of severity. Treatments and interventions aimed at supporting the unwell neonate have associated risks and the evidence underpinning them can range from limited to substantial. There is a degree of uncertainty in Neonatology, which can be very stressful for parents and clinicians alike. Parents need to be supported by the clinical team in making many complicated clinical decisions, a skill that requires robust communication of risks, benefits and alternatives. In 2019 the British Association of Perinatal Medicine released a framework of care advocating Shared Decision Making (SDM) as the optimal process for making clinical decisions on neonatal units. This model builds upon the "informed decision" models by putting a greater emphasis on involving parents in key decisions regarding the treatment of their babies medical condition. Evidence has demonstrated that SDM can improve parental satisfaction and reduce anxiety and the likelihood of feeling regret. In order to support parents in the SDM process, clinicians need to be able to provide impartial information encompassing the proposed intervention, intended benefit, potential risks and alternatives. Whilst clinicians may have preconceptions on the information that they think should be provided, there is limited evidence in the literature of what are the most important concepts and themes that parents would expect to be conveyed during the SDM process. ShAPE is a qualitative study that aims to
This is a Phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and effect of 1 or 2 mg baxdrostat versus placebo, administered once daily (QD) orally, on the reduction of systolic blood pressure in approximately 720 participants aged ≥ 18 years with hypertension, despite a stable regimen of 2 antihypertensive agents at baseline, one of which is a diuretic (uncontrolled hypertension); or ≥ 3 antihypertensive agents at baseline, one of which is a diuretic (treatment-resistant hypertension).
This is a study of amlitelimab for the treatment of participants with moderate-to-severe asthma. The study will have a double-blind treatment period until Week 24 for each participant and an open-label treatment period where each participant will receive open-label amlitelimab from Week 24 onwards. The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of amlitelimab for the treatment of adult participants with moderate-to-severe asthma who have previously been enrolled and completed the treatment period of the parent study. The study duration will be up to 156 weeks. The treatment duration will be up to 144 weeks. The number of visits will be 18.
Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating disease which causes severe bowel inflammation resulting in babies becoming critically unwell. It mainly affects premature babies (who can be born as early as 22 weeks) in the first few weeks of life. A quarter of babies don't respond to intensive care treatment and require surgery to remove bowel which has died to prevent them from getting sicker. Sadly, about a third of the most unwell babies don't survive and those that do have a high incidence of significant long-term health problems. Deciding which babies will benefit from surgery is challenging and there are no objective methods used to do this currently. Surgeons must weigh up the risks and benefits of performing major surgery on a tiny baby in the knowledge that surgery itself may cause harm. This uncertainty causes delays in performing surgery. Those that have a delay are more likely to have a poor outcome. In order to improve these unfavourable outcomes it is essential to understand and define current practice in detail (i.e. indications and timing for surgery) and understand how this may be associated with outcome. These outcomes are both short term, including mortality and ability to tolerate enteral nutrition, and long term which include neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of life. To do this the investigators will undertake a multicentre mixed methods study with qualitative interview of consultant paediatric surgeons shortly after making a decision to operate, or not, on a baby with NEC. The investigators will then take consent from the parents/guardian of the infant to follow-up their clinical outcomes using data linkage to routinely collected data, within the national neonatal research database. Outcomes of interest include survival, feeding outcomes, further surgical procedures and neurodevelopment at 2 years.
The primary research question to be answered in this project is "Are patients with locally-advanced head and neck cancer able to tolerate a PET-MRI scan when they are immobilised in a radiotherapy treatment shell?" This will be assessed by measuring the proportion of patients that complete the full scanning protocol and by obtaining participant feedback on their experience of completing the scan. The secondary question is "Can a PET-MRI scan fused with a planning CT scan improve the accuracy in radiotherapy planning of patients with head and neck cancer? Accuracy will be assessed by: 1. Comparing the radiotherapy target volumes and radiotherapy plans with and without the use of a PET-MRI scan. 2. Comparing inter- and intra-observer variability in treatment contours with and without the use of a PET-MRI scan within and between oncologists and implications of that.
1 in 7 babies require neonatal care. During their time in hospital their vital signs (such as heart rate, breathing rate and oxygen saturation) are continuously monitored as part of standard care. Many factors lead to changes in vital signs, for example, medical procedures such as blood tests can result in brief increases in heart rate. Medication can also alter vital signs, either as an intended effect or as a side effect. However, different infants will respond in different ways to both procedures and medication. Predicting how an individual infant may respond could lead to better individualised care for infants. For example, using an infant's baseline vital signs to predict whether they will experience cardiorespiratory side effects from a particular drug could mean that doctors could choose an alternative safer treatment plan. To develop these predictive models, it is essential to first better understand how infants' vital signs are affected by different procedures and drugs, and how these effects are impacted by other factors such as infection, other pathologies, interaction between drugs and age. Despite their routine use in hospital neonatal units, detailed electronic records of vital signs are often not recorded. Often, only major events or average values are stated on clinical records. Subtle changes in vital signs are therefore missed, and more complex analysis that may reveal important predictive features within the data is not possible. In this study the investigators will electronically record infant vital signs across longer time periods and during a variety of clinically-necessary procedures and administration of drugs, to explore how these impact vital signs and are altered by factors such as age and pathology. These will be compared with control procedures, such as a nappy change, or when the infant is resting in their cot or receiving skin-to-skin care.