There are about 36633 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in France. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Purpose The LDL-C is a very important marker of the lipid panel which allows the introduction of a treatment and then the follow-up to prevent the cardiovascular risk. Friedewald et al have established the most widely used equation at the present time. However, it has many well-known limitations, as being false in postprandial period. New equations have been developed recently. Our work consisted in the assessment of the accuracy of Friedewald, Sampson and Martin-Hopkins equations and evaluated the consequences in terms of misclassification. Given that European recommendations allow the realization of lipid profiles in postprandial period, we studied the accuracy of these equations in non-fasting state . Method The LDL cholesterol concentrations will be calculated using at least three different equations (Friedewald, Sampson, Martin-Hopkins). Results will be compared between equations and between calculated and measured concentrations determined using an ultracentrifugation method. The study is conducted out according to The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and obtained the agreement of the Scientific and Ethics Committee of the Hospices Civils de Lyon (LDL EQUATION CNIL 21_488) Hypothesis To evaluate the most accurate equation in different conditions: - Fasting and non-fasting state - In subjects with normal or dyslipidemic lipid profile To evaluate the clinical impact on risk re-classification and lipid treatment goals if LDL-c is calculated using the best equation instead of the Friedewald's.
Intracorneal rings are indicated in patients whose central cornea does not present opacity and whose visual acuity is not satisfied despite correction with lenses or linked to an intolerance to lenses. Surgeries such as crosslinking and intracorneal rings placement are alternatives to corneal transplantation with the expected effects: stabilization of the disease for corneal collagen crosslinking and visual rehabilitation by the placement of intracorneal rings. The main objective of this study is to evaluate visual benefit1 year after placement of intracorneal rings using laser in keratoconus
The main aim of this study is to determine safety and tolerability of modakafusp alfa given together with daratumumab to find out the best treatment dose. Another aim of this study is to learn more about the characteristics of modakafusp alfa.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat women with, or at high risk for developing hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, who have vasomotor symptoms (VMS), a condition of having hot flashes caused by anti-cancer therapy. VMS, also called hot flashes, are very common medical problems in women with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, who are receiving anti-cancer therapy. HR-positive breast cancer is a type of breast cancer, which has hormone-receptors (proteins) for female sex hormones estrogen and/or progesterone. These hormone-receptors may attach to hormones like estrogen and progesterone and thereby help cancer cells to grow and to spread. Treatments that stop these hormones from attaching to these receptors are currently used to slow or stop the growth of HR-positive breast cancer. It is already known that women with HR-positive breast cancer benefit from this treatment. However, hot flashes are common medical problems related to this therapy. They negatively affect quality of life of many women and may lead to discontinuation (stopping) of this therapy. The study treatment, elinzanetant is being developed to treat hot flushes. It works by blocking a substance called neurokinin from sending signals to other parts of the body, which is thought to play a role in starting hot flashes. The main purpose of this study is to learn more about how well elinzanetant helps to treat hot flashes caused by anti-cancer therapy in women with or at high risk for developing HR-positive breast cancer compared to placebo. A placebo is a treatment that looks like a medicine but does not have any medicine in it. To answer this, the doctors will ask the participants to record information about their hot flashes before treatment start and at certain time points during the treatment in an electronic diary. The researchers will then assess possible average changes in number and severity of hot flashes after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. To see how safe elinzanetant is compared to placebo. The study will collect information about the number of participants who have medical problems after taking treatment. The study participants will be randomly (by chance) assigned to 2 treatment groups, A and B. The participants from treatment group A will take elinzanetant. The participants from treatment group B will start with placebo and then switch to elinzanetant. All participants will continue taking the anti-cancer therapy they have been using when entering the study. Dependent on the treatment group, the participants will either take elinzanetant or placebo as capsules by mouth once a day. After 12 weeks, the participants who have initially received placebo will switch to take elinzanetant for the remaining 40 weeks. Each participant will be in the study for approximately 62 weeks. The treatment duration in the study will be 52 weeks. There will be up to 12 visits to the study site and 6 phone calls in between. Participants who completed the 52 weeks treatment phase, will be offered to continue treatment for another 2 years. Visit frequency: every 24 weeks until week 152. During the study, the participants will: - record information about their hot flashes - answer questions about their quality of life and other symptoms. The doctors and their study team will: - check the participants health and vital signs - take blood and urine samples - examine heart health using electrocardiogram (ECG) - examine pelvic organs like womb or ovaries using a trans vaginal ultrasound scan to see images of these organs - make images of the breast using x-ray (mammogram), a type of radiation that passes through the body to make images of the inside and/or by using ultrasound (if applicable) - check the health of the participant's cervix (neck of the womb) by taking a small sample of cells (smear test) for an analysis called cervical cytology (if applicable) - take an endometrial biopsy, a small piece of tissue from the lining of the womb (called the endometrium) for analysis. - ask the participants questions about what medicines they are taking and if they are having adverse events. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments. About 4 weeks after the participants take their last treatment, the study doctors and their team will check the participants' health.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, in terms of hematologic improvement, and safety of imetelstat in participants with high-risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is relapsed/refractory to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) treatment. Responding patients are eligible to continue treatment until loss of response/disease progression.
Cataracts and vitreo-retinal conditions are frequently associated and can lead to a combined surgery to treat both diseases at the same time. To date, in most cases cataract surgery is usually performed first, then followed by vitrectomy. However, there isn't any standard guidelines indicating what would be the best chronological order, or sequence, when performing those procedures. This randomised, double-arm, open-label study aims at investigating whether the sequence "cataract surgery then vitrectomy" or "vitrectomy then cataract surgery" can have an impact on iris hernia occurence.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mavacamten compared with placebo in participants with symptomatic non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM).
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of treatment with olpasiran, to placebo, on the risk for coronary heart disease death (CHD death), myocardial infarction, or urgent coronary revascularization in participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and elevated Lipoprotein(a).
Cystic fibrosis is a multi-organ disease. It most often results from a genetic mutation, the delta F508 mutation, which prevents the expression of the CFTR 'régulateur de conductance transmembranaire de la fibrose kystique) protein. If the poor prognosis of the disease is correlated to the pulmonary damage, we observe, at the naso-sinus level, a significant functional impact, with chronic rhino-sinusal damage that can alter the quality of life of patients. In addition to this functional impact, some studies suggest that these chronic naso-sinus attacks are involved in the creation of a bacterial reservoir that is secondarily responsible for pulmonary colonization and therefore partly responsible for the poor prognosis of the disease. The clinical and paraclinical examinations can be used to determine the extent of these disorders. Their functional impact can be assessed using quality of life questionnaires such as the SN-5 scale. Treatment with CFTR modulators in patients with mutations compatible with the treatment seems to transform their vital prognosis. The scientific rationale of this treatment consists in restoring the activity of the CFTR protein, allowing the recovery of the hydro-electrolytic balance of the mucous secretions, and thus reducing the viscosity of the biological fluids. The various studies carried out all prove a dramatic improvement in pulmonary parameters under treatment, with very limited toxicity. A marketing authorization for this treatment has been issued on the European market for patients over 18 years of age in 2020, for children over 12 years of age in 2021, and will soon be issued for children aged between 6 and 11 years. Since the pathophysiology of pulmonary and nasosinus involvement are similar, and since this treatment will be marketed for children between 6 and 11 years of age, we expect an improvement in rhino-sinus symptomatology. To date, clinical studies have focused primarily on pulmonary outcomes. There are only few publications dealing with the evolution of nasosinus symptomatology under treatment, and none concerning the pediatric population. The aim of our study is to evaluate the evolution of naso-sinusal symptomatology under treatment with CFTR modulators in children aged 6 to 11 years. This will allow us to confirm or deny the interest of these treatments in the extra-pulmonary manifestations of the disease.
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the functional impact of using a bionic myoelectric prosthesis (Hero Arm) in children with a transverse forearm agenesis upper limb deformity, after one year of use. The Hero Arm prosthesis is the first bionic myoelectric prosthesis reimbursed in France for children. The main objective is to Identify the functional difficulties encountered by the child related to the agenesis and which could be improved by wearing this prosthesis. The investigators will include children born between 2006 and 2012 with a unilateral upper limb malformation. These children are regularly followed at Reference Center for Limb Malformations (CEREFAM) at the Saint-Maurice Hospitals (HSM) for a unilateral upper limb deformity. CEREFAM is currently following a large cohort of children with malformations including 143 children with transverse forearm agenesis. Of these, approximately 10% have been prescribed a Hero Arm prosthesis. After the delivery of the Hero Arm, they are followed up in occupational therapy at HSM to learn how to use the prosthesis. This training lasts two days with an evaluation (T0). This assessment includes: - three questionnaires: the Canadian Measure of Occupational Performance (CMOP), a version of the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) that has been modified to fit the child, and a questionnaire completed by the CEREFAM. - two analytical and functional tests: the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and the modified 400-point assessment. The same assessment will be performed after one year of wearing the prosthesis (T1). This is a observational and non-interventional study. No changes have been made to the usual follow-up of the patient.