View clinical trials related to Keratoconus.
Filter by:The goal of this Prospective, single-site, cohort study is to validate rigid gas permeable corneal contact lens (RGP) designs for keratoconus derived from combining the data from corneal topography scans and contact lenses ordered in patients with keratoconus (KC) attending a UK tertiary NHS Hospital contact lens clinic. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does a Scheimpflug topography derived RGP contact lens design for keratoconus have the equivalent overall contact lens fit as the patients' own lens? - Is the number of trial lenses required to fit a patient is reduced compared to standard practice? - Is the time taken to fit a contact lens is reduced compared to standard practice? - Is there user acceptance of the new lens? - Are the Axial ege lift (AEL) changes clinically significant? There will be 3 work packages WP1: For each participant data collection will take place over two visits. • Visit 1: Pentacam topography scans and optimal 'virtual' lens selection will take place. • • Visit 2: Participants are fitted with 4 contact lenses (i) the optimal lens design as specified by the virtual fitting module, (ii) a contact lens with a clinically significant step flatter AEL (iii) a contact lens steeper in axial edge lift (AEL) (iv) the participant's own contact lens. Each CL fit will be assessed with slit lamp photography according to the standardised method proposed by Wolffsohn et al. (2013), Anterior segment OCT MS39) (CSO Hansom Instruments, UK) and best-corrected visual acuity with each lens design using high-contrast logMAR . WP2. Participants will attend one appointment where a traditional lens fit, and a lens fitted using the topography guided 'virtual' module will be undertaken (with the fitting method selected for each eye randomised). For each fitting method the total fitting time will be measured and the total number of trial contact lenses used. Patients will be invited to complete a questionnaire that probes their satisfaction of this process. WP3. Clinicians not involved in the study will be invited to examine a demo version of the virtual fitting module and complete the validated system usability scale tool.
This study aims to investigate the influences behind patient choices regarding involvement, discontinuation, or re-engagement in keratoconus clinical trials. Uncovering these factors is essential to enhance the relevance and efficacy of future research endeavors. In essence, this trial aims to deepen understanding of the factors influencing participation in keratoconus clinical trials. Elevating participation rates could expedite the development of innovative treatments for this challenging condition.
Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral asymmetric progressive corneal degenerative disease. The management of young patients, diagnosed with clinically evident KC in one eye and with no clinical signs of KC in the other eye, represents a real challenge for many ophthalmologists. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of epithelium-on accelerated CXL to stabilize the eye with no clinical signs of KC, in young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, compared with standard care and follow-up only.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare CXL with combined treatment with CXL and t-PTK. The main questions it aims to answer are whether combined treatment can give better visual acuity and if the treatments are equally safe.
Purpose: The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of eye drops containing high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMW-HA) and low molecular weight hyaluronic acid (LMW-HA) on corneal nerve regeneration, dendritic cell (DC) density, corneal sensitivity (CS), and ocular surface parameters in patients with keratoconus following corneal crosslinking (CXL). Methods: Sixty-three eyes of 55 keratoconus patients were randomized to instill eye drops containing HMW-HA (n: 20) for 12 months, LMW-HA (n:23) for 12 months and polyvinyl alcohol (n: 20) until the epithelial defect closure in the control group after CXL. Subbasal nerve plexsus (SNP) was imaged with corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) and ACCMetrics program was used to quantify corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve fiber branching density (CNBD) and corneal nerve fiber total branching density (CTBD). DC density was calculated with Image J software. CS was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, non-invasive break-up time (NI-TBUT) were evaluated. All measurements were performed before CXL and postoperatively after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
This study aims to compare the use of Dextenza, an FDA-approved intracanilular drug-eluting insert that is designed to deliver a tapered dose of dexamethasone to the ocular surface for 30 days, to the standard of care, or the use of a month-long topical prednisolone acetate 1% (PredForte) eye drops starting from four times daily. Following treatment, Dextenza resorbs and exits the nasolacrimal system without the need for removal. Three prior phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated that Dextenza is equally efficacious to a month-long topical Pred Forte taper in the treatment of postoperative inflammation following cataract surgery. This proposed study strives to demonstrate the non-inferiority of using Dextenza to treat postoperative inflammation following corneal collagen crosslinking compared to standard of care eye drops in a randomized trial. By demonstrating Dextenza's non-inferiority to treatment postoperative inflammation, the investigators hope to provide an alternative modality of treatment to patients who are unable to cooperate with or tolerate postoperative topical eye drop regimens, allowing for improved adherence to necessary therapy and thus improved postoperative outcomes.
The goal of this clinical trial is to document corneal ectasia stability in patients with keratoconus diagnosis treated with personalized cross linking energy. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is it effective while using personalized (reduced) energy? - Is it safe for corneas thinner than 400 microns? Participants will be treated with personalized energy corneal cross linking and posteriorly, will attend subsequent follow-up consults
Comparison of corneal topography based on oct OCT principle (CASIA2) with Pentacam and Scheimpflug-based biomechanical devices (Corvis ST) in screening and diagnosing keratoconus; and evaluation of the consistency with Pentacam in measuring corneal parameters (such as curvature and thickness).
Comparison of the screening and diagnosis ability of the novel Scheimpflug-based tomography device (Scansys) with Pentacam and the Scheimpflug-based biomechanics device (Corvis ST) for keratoconus.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled, Parallel-Group Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Epithelium-On Corneal Cross-linking in Subjects 8 to 45 Years of Age With Keratoconus