There are about 9403 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Switzerland. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Laparoscopy has become an indispensable part of modern surgery. Vision is an important and defining element of laparoscopy and significantly affects the outcome of an operation in regard to time, mistakes and precision. Several new imaging systems have become available for laparoscopic surgery, including three-dimensional (3D) high-definition (HD), and two-dimensional (2D) ultra-high-resolution (4K) monitors. In experimental and clinical settings, several studies have been published in recent years suggesting that 3D systems present a number of potential benefits for surgeons and patients compared to the conventional 2D systems. The 3D HD system significantly reduces operation time and blood loss, and additionally shortens hospital stay. However, the performance of 3D systems against the new, ultra-high-definition 4K systems is barely known and highly controversial. There is a paucity of studies comparing these two imaging systems in clinical settings. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare 2D 4K versus 3D HD imaging systems in a complex bariatric surgery, more precisely a gastric bypass operation. The investigators aim to investigate the hypothesis stating that the use of the 3D HD system yields a significant improvement in operating time compared to a 2D 4K system in bariatric laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, in order to give a comprehensive overview of the comparison of 2D 4K and 3D HD laparoscopy in a clinical setting, the investigators will assess the workload of the surgeon as well as the intraoperative and postoperative complications including the hospitalization time.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the immunity of persons fully vaccinated against measles, mumps and rubella and to examine the course of immunity after booster vaccination.
The investigators will obtain three-monthly voice recordings and fiberendoscopic examinations of the larynx/hypopharynx for a minimal period of 6 months from all laryngeal/hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC/HPSCC) patients, who have successfully completed curative primary treatment, except those who underwent total laryngectomy. Furthermore, the investigators will ask the patients to fill out the voice handicap index-30 questionnaire (VHI-30) during each study visit. The VHI-30 allows to make a subjective assessment of the patients' own vocal problem. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility and compliance of longterm regular voice monitoring in LSCC and HPSCC follow-up.
This observational study aims to gain knowledge on how the different midazolam formulations (oral syrup, rectal suppository, ODMT) are accepted by 2- to 10-year-old pediatric inpatients and outpatients at the University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB) in Switzerland. The present study will use non-invasive scoring to assess acceptability of the different midazolam formulations.
The goal of this observational study is to understand the processes in the growing follicles development in more detail and to improve In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatments. This involves measuring laboratory values in the blood, in the follicular fluid of the woman and in the sperm of the man as well as questionnaires concerning lifestyle factors. These values are then linked to the success of the fertility treatment to find out which of these values increase the success of the IVF treatment. Furthermore, the investigators want to investigate if there are differences between IVF treatments with or without hormonal stimulation of the ovaries.
The goal of this study is to learn more about the Headache Screening Questionnaire in people with Headache. The main question is: Does the lower limit of a 95% confidence interval of the HSQ in physiotherapy during a period of 2 to 4 weeks reach at least 0.4?
Healthy subjects will be invited to fill out a questionnaire regarding falls and balance skills followed by normal walking trials on a treadmill at 9 different speeds (0.28-1.4 m/s). Key gait parameters for the normative database will be collected. During the perturbation trials, the subjects will walk at a constant speed (1.2 m/s). The treadmill belts are ac, - or decelerated during the perturbations according to three different perturbation algorithms with varying perturbation onset. Movements will be analyzed by 3D motion capture, force plates, surface electromyography and IMU sensors. All methods are non-invasive and commonly used in the field of biomechanics.
In a single-blind, crossover, randomized, controlled trial with 40 participants we aim to demonstrate superior anaesthetic efficacy of lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% (IMP2) gel over EMLA 5% cream (IMP1) at comparable safety in sharp wound debridement of chronic leg ulcers. This is a monocentric investigator initiated trial conducted in the University Hospital Zurich. In this longitudinal trial, participants receive a sequence of different treatments (treatments on different days) and therefore are randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences. One-half of participants will first receive IMP1 (first treatment visit, randomized) and then IMP2 (second treatment visit, crossover); the other half of participants the reverse sequence (first treatment visit: IMP2, second treatment visit: IMP1). Primary Objective: We want to show that IMP 2 (lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% gel) is more effective in pain reduction than IMP 1 (EMLA® 5% cream) in sharp wound debridement.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether oral urea stimulates copeptin release and, if so, whether it may provide a novel diagnostic test in the differentiation between AVP-D (Arginine vasopressin deficiency) and PP (primary polydipsia).
The aim of this study is to test whether lymphatic surgery provides better QoL (assessed with the Lymph-ICF-UL, (Lymphedema Functioning Disability and health questionnaire for upper limb lymphedema)) 15 months after randomization (and therefore about one year after surgery) compared to conservative treatment only for patients with chronic lymphedema (LE)