There are about 28871 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Canada. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Poorly controlled chronic pain in teens can impact quality of life, increase opioid use and is a risk factor for developing chronic pain in adulthood. Currently, there is a shortage of support to help teens manage chronic pain in the community and the support that did exist has been significantly scaled back due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This research study will investigate, based on questionnaires with teens and healthcare providers and interviews with teens, whether pain rehabilitation virtual reality is easy to use and understand, satisfactory to use, and whether it may improve pain, mobility, and function for the teens using the program compared to those doing standard physiotherapy treatment over videoconference.
This first-in-human clinical feasibility study will evaluate the safety and performance of the R3 Vascular MAGNITUDE® Bioresorbable Drug-Eluting Scaffold and Delivery System in patients undergoing treatment for peripheral arterial disease severe enough to have significantly reduced the blood supply to their leg. The severe reduction in blood flow causes lifestyle limiting leg pain for these patients, and may lead to amputation of the affected limb due to the loss of tissue in the leg or foot from ulcers or gangrene. The investigational device being studied in this trial is intended to restore blood flow to the affected limb, providing symptomatic relief to the patient and reducing the risk of limb amputation. The scaffold is a type of vascular stent placed within the diseased artery below the knee to improve blood flow. Unlike commercially available metallic stents which are permanently placed within the artery, the MAGNITUDE® Bioresorbable scaffold is made of a polymer material that will completely dissolve away over time, providing the support necessary to the artery while it is healing after the treatment procedure and then slowly disappearing from the artery once that support is no longer needed. The investigational scaffold has been successfully used to treat vascular blockages in the coronary arteries of the heart, but the RESOLV I study will be the first time this device has been used to improve blood flow in the arteries of the lower leg. Patients enrolled in this study may have up to three vascular blockages in their lower leg arteries treated with the MAGNITUDE® Bioresorbable scaffold, and then will be assessed over the course of the following five years to evaluate whether the investigational treatment was successful in safely alleviating their leg pain and other symptoms.
Infants born preterm can spend months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where they experience stressful but essential procedures. Untreated stress is associated with altered brain development. Skin-to-skin holding (SSH) is one of the most effective behavioral strategies for mitigating preterm infant stress and improving brain maturation. However, parents may not be always available to provide SSH; some infants cannot be held for long periods for medical reasons. To address this problem, investigators designed Calmer, a patented, prototype therapy bed, for reducing stress in preterm infants. Calmer fits into NICU incubators and provides simultaneously an artificial skin surface, heartbeat sounds and breathing motion, mimicking aspects of SSH; the latter 2 features are individualized for each infant based on their parents' recordings. The 1st randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 58 preterm babies showed that during a routine blood test: Calmer lowered infant behavioral and heart stress responses and stabilized brain blood flow no differently than facilitated tucking; infants could be cared for safely on Calmer up to 6 hours in 1 day; Calmer was well accepted by mothers and staff. The goal now is to determine the efficacy of Calmer use over 3 weeks to support optimal physical growth and brain development in preterm infants. A 2-group (treatment, control) pilot RCT to test the implementation of an increased "dose" of Calmer exposure over 3 continuous weeks is proposed. 20 infants born between 26-30 weeks gestational age in the NICU will be randomized to receive either Calmer, for a minimum of 3 hours in total/day for 3 continuous weeks, or to 3 weeks of standard NICU care. Research questions: Trial feasibility Q1. Is it feasible to enrol 30 infants, complete a 3-week treatment period, and measure growth outcomes in preterm infants (26-30 weeks GA) in the NICU in a pilot RCT of daily Calmer treatment versus standard NICU care to inform a larger, definitive RCT? Infant outcomes Q2a. Are there differences in physical growth markers (daily weight gain, head circumference, body length) between preterm infants who receive Calmer and those who receive standard NICU care measured before (baseline) and after 3-weeks of daily Calmer exposure? Q2b. Are there differences in brain activity markers, as measured by cerebral electrical (EEG) signaling, between preterm infants who receive Calmer and those who receive standard NICU care, measured during 2 resting/sleeping state and routine diaper change sessions (baseline and post 3-weeks of daily Calmer exposure)?
This Phase Ib, multicenter, open-label study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cevostamab monotherapy, cevostamab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) or cevostamab plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (Dd) which will be administered to participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) via intravenous (IV) infusion.
The ophthalmology clientele is vulnerable in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic because of their age and comorbidities. Specifically, elderly patients aged 65 and above with glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, or diabetic retinopathy require regular follow-ups and commonly suffer from additional comorbidities. Further, because of the proximity between the patient and health care personnel during ophthalmological examinations, the risk of infection during visits is significant. The delicate balance between the risk of exposure to COVID-19 and visual loss in delaying cases is a psychological stressor to both patients and clinicians. A cross-sectional study accumulating the data of 425 patients aged 65 and above with various eye diseases will be conducted. Participants will be presented with a set of online questionnaires designed to collect data on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), depression symptoms, anxiety, sleep quality, community integration, and their experience with tele-consultations. This study can help quantify the collateral impact of the COVID-19 beyond the direct impact of the virus, to improve future quality of care guidelines on non-COVID-19 conditions, and to help plan patient prioritization once restrictions are eased.
Placement of a ureteral stent is a common urological intervention. For decades there was no valid measures available to assess quality of life issues in patients with ureteral stents, which has hampered the understanding of such symptoms and their true impact. In order to improve the outcomes associated with the placement of a stent, a validated tool is needed to measure its impact and the amount of undesirable effects it produces on patients requiring the placement of a stent. In 2003, the team of the Bristol Urological Institute developed a validated questionnaire called the: URETERAL STENT SYMPTOM QUESTIONNAIRE (USSQ). The questionnaire contains 38 items included in 6 sections. Despite the obvious need of a validated questionnaire, the latter remains unused by the community of peer urologists. Many of urologists consider it too long to be used in clinical practice and even for research purposes. This issue motivated the Canadian Endourology Group (CEG) to work collaboratively on the development of the CANADIAN ENDOUROLOGY GROUP STENT SYMPTOM SCORE (CEGSSS) in order to provide clinicians with a more useful and validated tool. To fulfill this objective, the CEG proceeds in three phases. Phase 1. A systematic, deliberative, and participatory approach mostly through face to face meetings, including patients, clinicians, and researchers in the field of Endourology to identify a minimum needs-based set of domains and items that are, clinically relevant to be included in the CEGSSS in order to ensure optimal uptake in the clinical setting. Phase 2. A pilot study to assess feasibility/acceptability and further refine the proposed set of items selected in phase 1 of the study. Phase 3. A multicentric prospective study to evaluate the validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the CEGSSS. This research project is conducted by the Canadian Endourology Group (CEG), a panel of experts in the field of endourology in Canada. The CEG is a national member-based organization dedicated to enabling the profession to provide the highest possible standards of endourological care and to advance the science of endourology by collaboratively: 1. Fostering excellence in endourological practice through advocacy, education, research and practice support tools, 2. Leading evidence-based clinical practice through the development of practice standards and guidelines in endourology, 3. Providing continuous professional development for Canadian endourologists along the career-path continuum, 4. Providing leadership in public education for endourological conditions.
This study will enroll subjects with stage 2 or 3 neurotrophic keratitis. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the CSB-001 investigational treatment arm or vehicle control arm. All subjects will dose with the randomized treatment four times daily for 8 weeks (controlled treatment phase). During the controlled treatment phase, subjects will return to the clinic weekly from Day 0 to Week 8, and again at Week 10. Subjects randomized to the vehicle arm who are not healed will have the opportunity to participate in an open-label uncontrolled treatment phase.
An investigation to find out if Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) index predicts postsurgical pain in children, since NIPE is thought to may be of guide to the appropriate therapy in a timely and objective manner, thereby improving patient safety, parental satisfaction, and reducing healthcare costs. We think that, validating the utility of NIPE in children under 3 years of age will allow the implementation of a novel pain assessment tool to our current practice of anesthetic care. This will improve the perioperative pain management, in particular for patients who are unable to communicate pain, with the potential to reduce detrimental consequences of postoperative pain. And also determining the relationship between the NIPE scores and validated FLACC scale for post-operative pain and PAED scale during the recovery from anesthesia and also to determine whether NIPE values at extubation correlates with the incidence of moderate and/or severe pain in PACU.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a 4-week lower extremity telerehabilitation protocol with aims to improve lower extremity function to a 4-week attention-controlled education program on lower extremity clinical outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare resources utilization among community dwelling adults with stroke across Canada.
Study Description: 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) use in neonatal circumcision are being practiced to prevent complications; however, no randomized controlled trials was ever done to assess efficacy and safety. This is a single-centered, randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) application in neonatal circumcision to prevent complication. Primary Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) application versus control in neonatal circumcision to prevent post-procedural complication. Secondary Objectives: 1. To assess post-procedural pain score difference between with versus without 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) application in neonatal circumcision 2. To assess parents' satisfaction and cosmesis post-neonatal circumcision with versus without 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) application. Endpoints: Primary Endpoint: Complication rates post-neonatal circumcision within 180 days with the following complication in specific or in composite ⦁ Bleeding requiring hemostatic intervention (suturing, dermabond application, silver nitrite application, pressure bandage) - Infection requiring antibiotic administration or wound drainage - Excess skin as assessed by parents satisfaction - Meatal stenosis - Adhesion requiring surgical correction. Secondary Endpoints: 1. pain score within 5 min and 30 minutes postneonatal circumcision using the FLACC score by parents and MBPS scale by a medical allied personnel. 2. Parents satisfaction as determined by a simple 10-score liked scale and cosmesis assessment scale within 24hrs and within 30 days post-neonatal circumcision. Complication rates detailed above in specific time points clustered according to (within 24 hrs, within 2 weeks, within 30 days, within 30 to 180 days). Study Population: 280 male neonates (140 each intervention groups) who are eligible for neonatal circumcision with no other medical co-morbidities. Intervention: 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) 0.5ml/ sticks) topical application around post-circumcision site subcoronal area.