View clinical trials related to Coronary Stenosis.
Filter by:The primary objective of this study is to compare the performance of SUPRAFLEX to that of XIENCE in an all-comers patient population with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. The patients will be followed through 3 years for major clinical events.
The objective of this clinical trial is to study the early safety and feasibility of the Shockwave Coronary Lithoplasty System. To demonstrate that the Shockwave device can safely and effectively deliver localized shockwave energy for balloon dilatation of calcified, stenotic, de novo coronary lesions.
BIOSOLVE-III Study is a pre-market, prospective, multi-center trial to assess the acute clinical performance of the DREAMS 2G Drug-Eluting Coronary Scaffold in de novo coronary artery lesions.
The aim is to compare the results of using T-provisional and Mini-Crush stenting techniques in patients with bifurcation lesions in the CTO segment.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting coronary stent "Calypso" (Angioline, Russia) in comparison with everolimus-eluting coronary stent "Xience" (Abbott Vascular, USA)
We had little experience in coronary intervention with recently introduced newer drug-eluting stent (DES) platforms, despite great anticipation, and optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for these stent systems still needs to be established. Herein, we plan the HOST-coronary intervention with next-generation drug-eluting stent platforms and abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (HOST-IDEA) trial to compare single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) after 3-month DAPT with 12-month DAPT in all-comers undergoing coronary intervention with third-generation DES with the thinnest struts. P2Y12 inhibitor treatment is added to aspirin during the 3-months period after the stenting, and this abbreviated duration of DAPT will be compared with conventional 1-year mandatory DAPT regimen in a 1:1 randomized stratification. Net adverse clinical events (NACEs), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction, clinically-drivent target lesion revascularization, definite or probable stent thrombosis and major bleeding is a primary endpoint for evaluating safety and efficacy of the difference of DAPT duration. 1-year target lesion failure (TLF) as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularization will be identified as a secondary ischemic outcome. 1-year major bleeding events classified as BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding events will be identified as a secondary bleeding outcome. With this trial, you will be able to get clear insight on the behavior of newer DES platforms. Reference data for the shortened mandatory DAPT regimen will also be delineated in the selected patients, and it might be helpful to those who need it.
Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is an important prognostic tool with regard to the detection of coronary artery stenoses. Both iodine delivery rate (IDR; the amount of iodine delivered to the patient per second) and iodine concentration are decisive factors in the opacification of arterial vessels. There remains to be some debate in the literature about whether the use of high iodine concentration contrast media is beneficial compared to lower iodine concentrations. To date, there have not been any studies comparing intracoronary attenuation using concentrated contrast media lower than 300 mg I/ml at coronary CTA. For a reliable comparison of CM with different iodine concentrations, adapted injection protocols insuring an identical IDR (in g iodine per second) are mandatory. The investigators hypothesize that usage of lower iodine concentrations, while maintaining identical IDR and total iodine load, will result in comparable diagnostical intra-vascular attenuation in CTA.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the performance of MISTENT to that of XIENCE in an all-comers patient population with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. The patients will be followed through 3 years for major clinical events.
The purpose of this registry is to collect real life information and to document the performance and user friendliness of iFR in daily diagnostic practice and treatment strategies for MVD patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Currently patients with certain cancer usually have routine follow up (Computed Tomography of Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis) CT TAP scans to see response to treatment or relapse. The study proposal allows the evaluation of the coronary arteries by modifying the current CT TAP technique without significant additional procedures, intravenous contrast or radiation - i.e. an opportunistic Computed Tomography Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) without any penalty. The question is does performing Computed Tomography (CT) of the thorax in such a way confer important additional information about cardiac risk? At the same time the investigators need to ensure that doing scan as per CTCA protocol produces equivalent image quality to evaluate other structures in the chest. A recent small retrospective study has using a similar technique suggests that it may in fact improve image quality due to less cardiac related motion artefact.